Brendon Herring1, Jason Whitt2, Tolulope Aweda3, Jianfa Ou4, Rachael Guenter1, Suzanne Lapi3, Joel Berry4, Herbert Chen2, Xiaoguang Liu4, J Bart Rose2, Renata Jaskula-Sztul5. 1. University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, AL. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, AL. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, AL. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, AL. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, AL. Electronic address: sztul@uab.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As patient-derived xenografts and other preclinical models of neuroendocrine tumors for testing personalized therapeutics are lacking, we have developed a perfused, 3D bioreactor model to culture tumor surrogates from patient-derived neuroendocrine tumors. This work evaluates the duration of surrogate culture and surrogate response to a novel antibody-drug conjugate. METHODS: Twenty-seven patient-derived neuroendocrine tumors were cultured. Histologic sections of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor xenograft (BON-1) tumor were assessed for SSTR2 expression before tumor implantation into 2 bioreactors. One surrogate was treated with an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-mitotic Monomethyl auristatin-E linked to a somatostatin receptor 2 antibody. Viability and therapeutic response were assessed by pre-imaging incubation with IR-783 and the RealTime-Glo AnnexinV Apoptosis and Necrosis Assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) over 6 days. A primary human pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was evaluated similarly. RESULTS: Mean surrogate growth duration was 34.8 days. Treated BON-1 surrogates exhibited less proliferation (1.2 vs 1.9-fold) and greater apoptosis (1.5 vs 1.1-fold) than controls, whereas treated patient-derived neuroendocrine tumor bioreactors exhibited greater degrees of apoptosis (13- vs 9-fold) and necrosis (2.5- vs 1.6-fold). CONCLUSION: Patient-derived neuroendocrine tumor surrogates can be cultured reliably within the bioreactor. This model can be used to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-guided chemotherapy ex vivo and may be useful for predicting clinical responses. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: As patient-derived xenografts and other preclinical models of neuroendocrine tumors for testing personalized therapeutics are lacking, we have developed a perfused, 3D bioreactor model to culture tumor surrogates from patient-derived neuroendocrine tumors. This work evaluates the duration of surrogate culture and surrogate response to a novel antibody-drug conjugate. METHODS: Twenty-seven patient-derived neuroendocrine tumors were cultured. Histologic sections of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor xenograft (BON-1) tumor were assessed for SSTR2 expression before tumor implantation into 2 bioreactors. One surrogate was treated with an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-mitotic Monomethyl auristatin-E linked to a somatostatin receptor 2 antibody. Viability and therapeutic response were assessed by pre-imaging incubation with IR-783 and the RealTime-Glo AnnexinV Apoptosis and Necrosis Assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) over 6 days. A primary human pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was evaluated similarly. RESULTS: Mean surrogate growth duration was 34.8 days. Treated BON-1 surrogates exhibited less proliferation (1.2 vs 1.9-fold) and greater apoptosis (1.5 vs 1.1-fold) than controls, whereas treated patient-derived neuroendocrine tumor bioreactors exhibited greater degrees of apoptosis (13- vs 9-fold) and necrosis (2.5- vs 1.6-fold). CONCLUSION: Patient-derived neuroendocrine tumor surrogates can be cultured reliably within the bioreactor. This model can be used to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-guided chemotherapy ex vivo and may be useful for predicting clinical responses. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Laura R Saunders; Alexander J Bankovich; Wade C Anderson; Monette A Aujay; Sheila Bheddah; KristenAnn Black; Radhika Desai; Paul A Escarpe; Johannes Hampl; Amy Laysang; David Liu; Javier Lopez-Molina; Milly Milton; Albert Park; Marybeth A Pysz; Hui Shao; Brian Slingerland; Michael Torgov; Samuel A Williams; Orit Foord; Philip Howard; Jacek Jassem; Andrzej Badzio; Piotr Czapiewski; David H Harpole; Afshin Dowlati; Pierre P Massion; William D Travis; M Catherine Pietanza; J T Poirier; Charles M Rudin; Robert A Stull; Scott J Dylla Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Jonathan Strosberg; Ghassan El-Haddad; Edward Wolin; Andrew Hendifar; James Yao; Beth Chasen; Erik Mittra; Pamela L Kunz; Matthew H Kulke; Heather Jacene; David Bushnell; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Richard P Baum; Harshad R Kulkarni; Martyn Caplin; Rachida Lebtahi; Timothy Hobday; Ebrahim Delpassand; Eric Van Cutsem; Al Benson; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; Marianne Pavel; Jaime Mora; Jordan Berlin; Enrique Grande; Nicholas Reed; Ettore Seregni; Kjell Öberg; Maribel Lopera Sierra; Paola Santoro; Thomas Thevenet; Jack L Erion; Philippe Ruszniewski; Dik Kwekkeboom; Eric Krenning Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Lucia D'Amico; Ulrike Menzel; Michael Prummer; Philipp Müller; Mélanie Buchi; Abhishek Kashyap; Ulrike Haessler; Alexander Yermanos; Rémy Gébleux; Manfred Briendl; Tamara Hell; Fabian I Wolter; Roger R Beerli; Iva Truxova; Špíšek Radek; Tatjana Vlajnic; Ulf Grawunder; Sai Reddy; Alfred Zippelius Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Brendon Herring; Samuel Jang; Jason Whitt; Kayla Goliwas; Zviadi Aburjania; Vikas Dudeja; Bin Ren; Joel Berry; James Bibb; Andra Frost; Herbert Chen; John Bart Rose; Renata Jaskula-Sztul Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 5.555