Isibor Arhuidese1, Besma Nejim2, Eunice A Aji3, Joseph Canner4, Mahmoud B Malas5. 1. Division of Vascular Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla; Division of Vascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md. 2. Division of Vascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md; Division of Vascular Surgery, Penn State University, Hershey, Pa. 3. Department of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria. 4. Division of Vascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md. 5. Division of Vascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, Calif. Electronic address: mmalas@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates survival of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after major lower extremity amputation (MLEA), given the burden of peripheral arterial disease in patients with ESRD, the hindrance posed by cardiovascular disease on their survival, and the national investment in ESRD-related care. METHODS: A retrospective review of all hemodialysis patients (HD) and renal transplant (RT) recipients who underwent MLEA between January 2007 and December 2011 in the United States Renal Data System was performed. Univariable, Kaplan-Meier, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate patient survival among HD patients and RT recipients overall; and within strata of amputation level, gender, and race. RESULTS: There were 32,540 MLEAs (HD, 92%; RT, 8%). Among HD patients, the median survival was 6 months for above knee amputation (AKA) and 16 months for below knee amputation (BKA). The risk-adjusted mortality was higher for AKA compared with BKA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.52; P < .001), females compared with males (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .004), but lower for blacks (aHR, 0.78 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; P < .001) and Hispanics (aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.79; P < .001) compared with white HD patients. Among RT recipients, the median survival was 16 months for AKA and 47 months for BKA. Mortality was significantly higher for above knee amputees compared with below knee amputees (aHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.60-2.10; P < .001). However, there was no difference in mortality between the gender and racial categories of RT recipients. There was a twofold increase in the 30-day mortality (adjusted odd ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.66-2.25; P < .001) and long-term mortality (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.05-2.32; P < .001) for HD patients relative to RT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after MLEA is limited in patients with ESRD. It is relatively better for RT recipients compared with HD patients. Mortality was higher for females compared with males, but lower for blacks and Hispanics compared with white HD patients. There were no gender- or race-specific difference in mortality among RT recipients. These estimates of life expectancy should guide the informed decision- making process for patients and their healthcare providers when the need for intervention arises after MLEA in these unique categories of patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates survival of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after major lower extremity amputation (MLEA), given the burden of peripheral arterial disease in patients with ESRD, the hindrance posed by cardiovascular disease on their survival, and the national investment in ESRD-related care. METHODS: A retrospective review of all hemodialysis patients (HD) and renal transplant (RT) recipients who underwent MLEA between January 2007 and December 2011 in the United States Renal Data System was performed. Univariable, Kaplan-Meier, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate patient survival among HD patients and RT recipients overall; and within strata of amputation level, gender, and race. RESULTS: There were 32,540 MLEAs (HD, 92%; RT, 8%). Among HD patients, the median survival was 6 months for above knee amputation (AKA) and 16 months for below knee amputation (BKA). The risk-adjusted mortality was higher for AKA compared with BKA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-1.52; P < .001), females compared with males (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .004), but lower for blacks (aHR, 0.78 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; P < .001) and Hispanics (aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.79; P < .001) compared with white HD patients. Among RT recipients, the median survival was 16 months for AKA and 47 months for BKA. Mortality was significantly higher for above knee amputees compared with below knee amputees (aHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.60-2.10; P < .001). However, there was no difference in mortality between the gender and racial categories of RT recipients. There was a twofold increase in the 30-day mortality (adjusted odd ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.66-2.25; P < .001) and long-term mortality (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.05-2.32; P < .001) for HD patients relative to RT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after MLEA is limited in patients with ESRD. It is relatively better for RT recipients compared with HD patients. Mortality was higher for females compared with males, but lower for blacks and Hispanics compared with white HD patients. There were no gender- or race-specific difference in mortality among RT recipients. These estimates of life expectancy should guide the informed decision- making process for patients and their healthcare providers when the need for intervention arises after MLEA in these unique categories of patients.