Junjie Yang1, Guanhua Dou2, Bai He2, Qinhua Jin2, Zhiye Chen3, Jing Jing2, Marcelo F Di Carli4, Yundai Chen5, Ron Blankstein4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Master Program of Medical Science and Clinical Investigation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. 4. Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: cyundai@vip.163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial blood flow ratio (SFR), a novel parameter derived from stress dynamic computed tomographic perfusion (CTP), for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. BACKGROUND: A comprehensive cardiac computed tomographic protocol combining coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and CTP can provide a simultaneous assessment of both coronary artery anatomy and ischemia. METHODS: Patients with chest pain scheduled for invasive angiography were prospectively enrolled in this study. Stress dynamic CTP was performed followed by coronary CTA using a second-generation dual-source computed tomographic system. At subsequent invasive angiography, fractional flow reserve was performed to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis. For each coronary territory, SFR was defined as the ratio of hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) in an artery with stenosis to hyperemic MBF in a nondiseased artery. The diagnostic accuracy of SFR to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis was determined against the reference standard of invasive fractional flow reserve ≤0.80. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients (mean age 58.5 ± 10 years) with 101 vessels with either 1- or 2-vessel disease were included. By FFR, 48 (47.5%) vessels were deemed hemodynamically significant. Hyperemic MBF and SFR were lower for vessels with hemodynamically significant lesions (95.1 ± 32.4 ml/100 ml/min vs. 142.5 ± 31.2 ml/100 ml/min and 0.66 ± 0.14 vs. 0.90 ± 0.07, respectively; p < 0.01 for both). When compared with ≥50% stenosis by CTA, the specificity for detecting ischemia by SFR increased from 43% to 91%, while the sensitivity decreased from 95% to 62%. Accordingly, the positive and negative predictive values were 85% and 73%, respectively. The combination of stenosis ≥50% by CTA and SFR resulted in an area under the curve of 0.91, which was significantly higher compared with hyperemic MBF (area under the curve = 0.79; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Calculation of SFR by dynamic CTP provides a novel and accurate method to identify flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial blood flow ratio (SFR), a novel parameter derived from stress dynamic computed tomographic perfusion (CTP), for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. BACKGROUND: A comprehensive cardiac computed tomographic protocol combining coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and CTP can provide a simultaneous assessment of both coronary artery anatomy and ischemia. METHODS:Patients with chest pain scheduled for invasive angiography were prospectively enrolled in this study. Stress dynamic CTP was performed followed by coronary CTA using a second-generation dual-source computed tomographic system. At subsequent invasive angiography, fractional flow reserve was performed to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis. For each coronary territory, SFR was defined as the ratio of hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) in an artery with stenosis to hyperemic MBF in a nondiseased artery. The diagnostic accuracy of SFR to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis was determined against the reference standard of invasive fractional flow reserve ≤0.80. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients (mean age 58.5 ± 10 years) with 101 vessels with either 1- or 2-vessel disease were included. By FFR, 48 (47.5%) vessels were deemed hemodynamically significant. Hyperemic MBF and SFR were lower for vessels with hemodynamically significant lesions (95.1 ± 32.4 ml/100 ml/min vs. 142.5 ± 31.2 ml/100 ml/min and 0.66 ± 0.14 vs. 0.90 ± 0.07, respectively; p < 0.01 for both). When compared with ≥50% stenosis by CTA, the specificity for detecting ischemia by SFR increased from 43% to 91%, while the sensitivity decreased from 95% to 62%. Accordingly, the positive and negative predictive values were 85% and 73%, respectively. The combination of stenosis ≥50% by CTA and SFR resulted in an area under the curve of 0.91, which was significantly higher compared with hyperemic MBF (area under the curve = 0.79; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Calculation of SFR by dynamic CTP provides a novel and accurate method to identify flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
Authors: Jagat Narula; Y Chandrashekhar; Amir Ahmadi; Suhny Abbara; Daniel S Berman; Ron Blankstein; Jonathon Leipsic; David Newby; Edward D Nicol; Koen Nieman; Leslee Shaw; Todd C Villines; Michelle Williams; Harvey S Hecht Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2020-11-20
Authors: Khaled M Abdelrahman; Marcus Y Chen; Amit K Dey; Renu Virmani; Aloke V Finn; Ramzi Y Khamis; Andrew D Choi; James K Min; Michelle C Williams; Andrew J Buckler; Charles A Taylor; Campbell Rogers; Habib Samady; Charalambos Antoniades; Leslee J Shaw; Matthew J Budoff; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein; Jagat Narula; Nehal N Mehta Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 24.094