Literature DB >> 31542406

Greater efficacy of SPF 100+ sunscreen compared with SPF 50+ in sunburn prevention during 5 consecutive days of sunlight exposure: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Indermeet Kohli1, Cynthia L Nicholson2, Joshua D Williams3, Alexis B Lyons1, InSeok Seo3, Prithwiraj Maitra3, Xiaoyan Tian3, Evren Atillasoy3, Henry W Lim1, Iltefat H Hamzavi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beach vacations are high-risk settings for overexposure to ultraviolet radiation.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the sunburn protective efficacy of SPF 50+ and SPF 100+ sunscreens under actual use at the beach.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, split-body/face study of 55 healthy individuals. Each participant applied both sunscreens to randomized sides of the face/body for up to 5 consecutive days. Blinded clinical evaluation of erythema by a single grader and objective instrumental assessments, colorimetry, and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy were performed the morning after each sun exposure.
RESULTS: After 5 days, 31 (56%) participants had more sunburn on the SPF 50+ side compared to 4 (7%) on the SPF 100+ side. Overall, mean erythema intensity showed statistically significantly less erythema on the SPF 100+ side compared with the SPF 50+ side. The first observation of sunburn exclusively on the SPF 50+ side occurred after 1 day of sun exposure, whereas that for SPF 100+ occurred after 3 days of sun exposure. LIMITATIONS: Only initial sunscreen application was monitored, only 1 participant with skin phototype I was recruited, and participants were recruited from a local beach area.
CONCLUSION: SPF 100+ was significantly more effective in protecting against ultraviolet radiation-induced erythema and sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use in a beach vacation setting.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPF; beach; clinical research; general dermatology; medical dermatology; prevention; sunlight; sunscreen; sun protection factor; vacation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31542406     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  8 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for the prevention of skin cancer.

Authors:  Megan Sander; Michael Sander; Toni Burbidge; Jennifer Beecker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Modeling acute and cumulative erythemal sun exposure on vulnerable body sites during beach vacations utilizing behavior-encoded 3D body models.

Authors:  Alois W Schmalwieser; Matthew A Lohr; Susan M Daly; Joshua D Williams
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 3.  Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light.

Authors:  Amaris N Geisler; Evan Austin; Julie Nguyen; Iltefat Hamzavi; Jared Jagdeo; Henry W Lim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Sunscreen Use among a Population of Saudi University Students.

Authors:  Mohammed I AlJasser; Abdullah Aljumah; Mohannad Alzaydi; Abdullah Alassaf; Suliman Alassafi; Maha T Alassafi; Mohammed Almedlej; Emad Masuadi
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2020-03-16

Review 5. 

Authors:  Megan Sander; Michael Sander; Toni Burbidge; Jennifer Beecker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Laboratory testing of sunscreens on the US market finds lower in vitro SPF values than on labels and even less UVA protection.

Authors:  David Q Andrews; Kali Rauhe; Carla Burns; Emily Spilman; Alexis M Temkin; Sean Perrone-Gray; Olga V Naidenko; Nneka Leiba
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Synthesis and Evaluation of Chalcone Derivatives as Novel Sunscreen Agent.

Authors:  Lucia Wiwid Wijayanti; Respati Tri Swasono; Wonkoo Lee; Jumina Jumina
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Outdoor sunscreen testing with high-intensity solar exposure in a Chinese and Caucasian population.

Authors:  Corinne Granger; Gavin Ong; Philippe Andres; Carles Trullàs; Muzzammil Hosenally; Wei Lai; Wei Liu; Jean Krutmann; Thierry Passeron; Henry W Lim
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.254

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.