J Alberto Neder1, Danilo C Berton2, Mathieu Marillier3, Anne-Catherine Bernard3, Denis E O Donnell3. 1. Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Queen's University & Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada. Electronic address: alberto.neder@queensu.ca. 2. Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Queen's University & Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Division of Respirology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Su, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 3. Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Queen's University & Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exertional dyspnea increases when the mechanical output of the respiratory muscles becomes uncoupled from increases in neural respiratory drive. Combining measurements of inspiratory constraints and ventilatory inefficiency may better uncover the role of mechanical-ventilatory abnormalities on exertional dyspnea than the currently-recommended approach, i.e., a low breathing reserve. METHODS: We determined the presence of a low breathing reserve (1-(peak ventilation (V̇E)/estimated maximal voluntary ventilation) x 100 < 15%), critical inspiratory constraints (tidal volume (VT)/exercise inspiratory capacity (ICdyn) > 0.7) and ventilatory inefficiency (V̇E/CO2 output (V̇CO2) nadir>34) in 284 subjects (161 males) with "disproportionate dyspnea" (N = 148), "dyspnea with multiple potential causes" (N = 93) and "dyspnea without an apparent cause. RESULTS: The agreement between breathing reserve and assessment of inspiratory constraints was only "fair" (kappa [confidence interval (CI)] = 0.264 [0.169-0.358]). Attainment of critical inspiratory constraints and an upward inflection in dyspnea ratings systematically preceded a low breathing reserve. Of note, ~55% (93/167) of subjects with normal breathing reserve showed critical inspiratory constraints despite largely preserved lung function. Regardless of the breathing reserve, subjects showing critical inspiratory constraints and/or poor ventilatory efficiency reported higher dyspnea and more impaired exercise tolerance compared to their counterparts (p < 0.05). Poor ventilatory efficiency strongly predicted a high dyspnea/work rate in subjects without critical inspiratory constraints regardless of the breathing reserve (odds ratio [95% CI] = 4.21 [2.01-6.42; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An integrated analysis of inspiratory constraints and ventilatory inefficiency is key to uncover physiological abnormalities germane to dyspnea in clinical populations in whom the origins of this distressing symptom are uncertain.
BACKGROUND: Exertional dyspnea increases when the mechanical output of the respiratory muscles becomes uncoupled from increases in neural respiratory drive. Combining measurements of inspiratory constraints and ventilatory inefficiency may better uncover the role of mechanical-ventilatory abnormalities on exertional dyspnea than the currently-recommended approach, i.e., a low breathing reserve. METHODS: We determined the presence of a low breathing reserve (1-(peak ventilation (V̇E)/estimated maximal voluntary ventilation) x 100 < 15%), critical inspiratory constraints (tidal volume (VT)/exercise inspiratory capacity (ICdyn) > 0.7) and ventilatory inefficiency (V̇E/CO2 output (V̇CO2) nadir>34) in 284 subjects (161 males) with "disproportionate dyspnea" (N = 148), "dyspnea with multiple potential causes" (N = 93) and "dyspnea without an apparent cause. RESULTS: The agreement between breathing reserve and assessment of inspiratory constraints was only "fair" (kappa [confidence interval (CI)] = 0.264 [0.169-0.358]). Attainment of critical inspiratory constraints and an upward inflection in dyspnea ratings systematically preceded a low breathing reserve. Of note, ~55% (93/167) of subjects with normal breathing reserve showed critical inspiratory constraints despite largely preserved lung function. Regardless of the breathing reserve, subjects showing critical inspiratory constraints and/or poor ventilatory efficiency reported higher dyspnea and more impaired exercise tolerance compared to their counterparts (p < 0.05). Poor ventilatory efficiency strongly predicted a high dyspnea/work rate in subjects without critical inspiratory constraints regardless of the breathing reserve (odds ratio [95% CI] = 4.21 [2.01-6.42; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An integrated analysis of inspiratory constraints and ventilatory inefficiency is key to uncover physiological abnormalities germane to dyspnea in clinical populations in whom the origins of this distressing symptom are uncertain.
Authors: J Alberto Neder; Devin B Phillips; Mathieu Marillier; Anne-Catherine Bernard; Danilo C Berton; Denis E O'Donnell Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 4.566