| Literature DB >> 31540263 |
Yong Sung Kwon1, Sunmin Lee2, Seung Hwa Lee3, Hae Jin Kim4, Choong Hwan Lee5.
Abstract
Many ethnic fermented soybean products (FSPs) have long been consumed as seasoning and protein sources in East Asia. To evaluate the quality of various FSPs in East Asia, non-targeted metabolite profiling with multivariate analysis of six traditional FSPs (Natto; NT, Cheonggukjang; CG, Doenjang; DJ, Miso; MS, Doubanjiang; DB, Tianmianjiang; TM) was performed. Six FSPs could be clearly distinguished by principle component analysis (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Amino acid contents were relatively higher in NT and CG, sugar and sugar alcohol contents were relatively higher in MS and TM, isoflavone glycoside contents were relatively highest in CG, isoflavone aglycon contents were the highest in DJ, and soyasaponin contents were the highest in CG. Antioxidant activity and physicochemical properties were determined to examine the relationships between the FSPs and their antioxidant activities. We observed a negative correlation between isoflavone aglycon contents and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) activity. Furthermore, the order of ABTS activity of FSPs has a positive correlation with the order of soybean content in the six FSPs. Herein it was found that primary metabolites were affected by the main ingredients and secondary metabolites were most influenced by the fermentation time, and that soybean content contributed more to antioxidant activity than fermentation time.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; fermented soybean product; metabolomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31540263 PMCID: PMC6780719 DOI: 10.3390/metabo9090183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1PCA score plots, PLS-DA score plots, and PLS loading plots of six FSPs (NT: natto, CG: cheonggukjang, DJ: doenjang, MS: miso, DB: doubanjiang, TM: tianmianjiang). (A) PCA score plot, (B) PLS-DA score plot, and (C) PLS-DA loading plot derived from GC-TOF-MS; and (D) PCA score plot, (E) PLS-DA score plot, and (F) PLS-DA loading plot derived from UHPLC-LTQ-IT-MS/MS. Plot annotation: 1, serine: 2, threonine: 3, alanine: 4, glycine: 5, isoleucine: 6, phenylalanine: 7, leucine: 8, methionine: 9, valine: 10, proline: 11, ribose: 12, ribitol: 13, maltose: 14, xylitol: 15, glycerol: 16, galactose: 17, myo-inositol: 18, sucrose: 19, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine: 20, pinitol: 21, glutaric acid: 22, gluconic acid: 23, fumaric acid: 24, acetic acid: 25, benzoic acid: 26, ribonic acid: 27, lactic acid: 28, linolenic acid: 29, stearic acid: 30, glyceryl palmitate: 31, hydroxylamine: 32, genistein derivatives: 33, daidzein derivatives: 34, genistin: 35, malonyldaidzin: 36, malonylgenistein: 37, glycitein: 38, genistein: 39, daidzin: 40, dehydrosoyasaponin I: 41, soyasaponin III: 42, soyasaponin IV: 43, soyasaponin V: 44, soyasaponin I: 45, soyasaponin II: 46, soyasapogenol C: 47, capsaicin: 48, dihydrocapsaicin: 49, lysoPE16:0: 50, lysoPE18:1: 51, lysoPC18:2: 52, lysoPC18:3: 53, lysoPC18:1: 54, flazin: N.I., non-identified compound: 55, N.I. 1: 56, N.I. 2: 57, N.I. 3: 58, N.I. 4: 59, N.I. 5: 60, N.I. 6: 61, N.I. 7: 62, N.I. 8: 63, N.I. 9: 64, N.I. 10: 65, N.I. 11: 66, N.I. 12: 67, N.I. 13.
Information for the six kinds of FSPs a.
| Sample No. | Product | General Main Ingredient | General Fermentation Period | Producer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean | Cereal | Chili pepper | ||||
| 1 | Natto | 99.99% | - | - | 18 h | Shikaya Co., LTD |
| 2 | Suzusei Shokuhin Co., LTD | |||||
| 3 | Azuma Shokuhin Co., LTD | |||||
| 4 | Marumiya Co., LTD | |||||
| 5 | Takanofoods Co., LTD | |||||
| 6 | Cheonggukjang | 95%–99% | - | - | 2 days | YoungPyung |
| 7 | Seoilfarm | |||||
| 8 | PulDangGol | |||||
| 9 | JukHyangKong | |||||
| 10 | ChungHo food | |||||
| 11 | Doenjang | 80%–95% | - | - | 1~3 years | Sambou |
| 12 | MooSooChon | |||||
| 13 | Greensoy | |||||
| 14 | Koreamac | |||||
| 15 | SunJae food | |||||
| 16 | Miso | 60% | 25%c | - | 2~12 months | Marusanai CO., LTD |
| 17 | Miyasaka Jozo CO., LTD | |||||
| 18 | Hanamaruki Foods Inc. | |||||
| 19 | Masuyamiso CO., LTD | |||||
| 20 | Marukome CO., LTD | |||||
| 21 | Doubanjiang | 20%b | 5%d | 40%–50% | over 1 year | Lee Kum Kee CO., LTD |
| 22 | Shandong Shinho Food Industries CO., LTD | |||||
| 23 | Haha Jiang Yuan CO., LTD | |||||
| 24 | Sichuan Dandan Pixian Bean Paste Group CO., LTD | |||||
| 25 | Kikkoman Corporation | |||||
| 26 | Tianmianjiang | 0%–30% | 20%–40% d | - | over 1 year | Hsien Erh Mei Foods Industry CO., LTD |
| 27 | Weihai Sihai Brewed CO., LTD | |||||
| 28 | Shandong Shinho Food Industries CO., LTD | |||||
| 29 | Tian Jin Limin Condiment CO., LTD | |||||
| 30 | Youki Food CO., LTD | |||||
a Fermented soybean products (FSPs), b mixed with soybean and broad bean, c rice, d wheat.
Figure 2Heat map representations for the relative contents of significantly discriminant primary and secondary metabolites in six FSPs analyzed by GC-TOF-MS and UHPLC-LTQ-IT-MS/MS. Metabolites were selected by variable importance in the projection (VIP) value > 1.0, p-value < 0.05. All values were averaged for FSP types.
Comparison of bioactivity phenotypes and physicochemical characteristics in the six FSPs.
| NT | CG | DJ | MS | DB | TM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC f | 68 ± 5.88a | 63 ± 11a,b | 54 ± 4.44a,b | 57 ± 8.30a,b | 50 ± 16b | 54 ± 10a,b |
| TFC g | 32 ± 5.00a | 32 ± 12a | 16 ± 2.42b | 10 ± 4.43b | 18 ± 7.24b | 21 ± 12a,b |
| Reducing sugar content h | 1.94 ± 0.11d | 1.54 ± 0.29d | 3.22 ± 0.23b | 3.92 ± 0.46a | 2.58 ± 0.78c | 4.44 ± 0.27a |
| Salinity i | 1.94 ± 0.11d | 1.54 ± 0.23d | 3.22 ± 0.18b | 3.36 ± 0.39a | 2.24 ± 0.65c | 3.78 ± 0.23a |
| pH j | 7.16 ± 0.28a | 6.66 ± 0.14b | 5.72 ± 0.15c | 5.42 ± 0.05d | 4.51 ± 0.29e | 4.56 ± 0.25e |
| Titratable acidity k | 6.07 ± 1.17b | 4.49 ± 1.73b | 10.19 ± 1.12a | 9.56 ± 1.85a | 6.07 ± 2.15b | 11.31 ± 2.31a |
| Amino type nitrogen content l | 2976 ± 705b | 1336 ± 433c | 6161 ± 848a | 2634 ± 679b | 1790 ± 1519b,c | 2368 ± 346b,c |
f, Expressed as naringin equivalent concentration (NE) (ppm): g, Expressed as gallic acid equivalent concentration (GE) (ppm): h, Expressed as Brix%: i, Expressed as mg%: j, Expressed as pH: k, Expressed as g/100 mL: l, Expressed as % acid. All the values were averaged for FSP types. Different letters (a–e) in the table indicate significant difference determined by ANOVA, followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 3Comparison of ABTS (bar graph) and soybean content (line graph) for six FSPs. All the values were averaged for the six FSP types. Different letters in the table indicate the significant difference obtained by ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test (p-value < 0.05).