Literature DB >> 31539637

Primary HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Europe: implementation status, challenges, and future plans.

P J Maver1, M Poljak2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytology-based screening has been a cornerstone of cervical cancer prevention for decades. Following extensive evidence demonstrating higher sensitivity and accuracy, lower variability and better reproducibility of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening compared with conventional or liquid-based cytology, recent European guidelines strongly recommend primary HPV-based screening over standard cytology-based screening. In addition, HPV-based screening offers the possibility of self-sampling and makes possible longer screening intervals in women with negative screening results.
OBJECTIVES: We summarize the current status of implementation of HPV-based screening in Europe, describe the real-life experience and challenges from countries already performing HPV-based screening, and briefly review immediate and long-term plans for screening implementation in selected European countries. SOURCES: Data were obtained from peer-reviewed literature, personal communication with experts and authorities involved in formulating national recommendations and practical guidelines, and relevant national websites. CONTENT: As of July 2019, the Netherlands and Turkey are the only European countries with fully implemented national HPV-based cervical cancer screening. Italy, Sweden and Finland have already implemented HPV-based screening in several regions, and several other countries are at various stages of implementation. Some countries are considering transitioning from cytology-based to HPV-based screening, but are struggling with the suboptimal performance of current population-based programmes. Implementation of HPV-based screening has resulted in higher colposcopy referral rates, but also higher detection rates of CIN3+ lesions and cervical cancers requiring immediate treatment. Cytology is mostly used as a triage test, although other strategies are under consideration in some countries. IMPLICATIONS: HPV-based screening is best suited in organized population-based screening settings. In 2019, cervical cancer screening policies across Europe vary greatly. Experience in countries with national and regional HPV-based screening already implemented is generally very positive. Urgent action is needed in many European countries, especially those with suboptimal opportunistic cytology-based cervical cancer screening.
Copyright © 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; Human papillomavirus; Implementation; Primary HPV-based screening; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31539637     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  34 in total

1.  Cervical Cancer Elimination Is Dependent on Women's Self-Tests for Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing Triaged by Methylation Status.

Authors:  Diane M Harper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 2.  False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening-Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health.

Authors:  Anna Macios; Andrzej Nowakowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Ensuring a Successful Transition From Cytology to Human Papillomavirus-Based Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Canada by Investigating the Psychosocial Correlates of Women's Intentions: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Authors:  Gabrielle Griffin-Mathieu; Ben Haward; Ovidiu Tatar; Patricia Zhu; Samara Perez; Gilla K Shapiro; Emily McBride; Erika L Thompson; Laurie W Smith; Aisha K Lofters; Ellen M Daley; Juliet R Guichon; Jo Waller; Marc Steben; Kathleen M Decker; Marie-Helene Mayrand; Julia M L Brotherton; Gina S Ogilvie; Gregory D Zimet; Teresa Norris; Zeev Rosberger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  US women screen at low rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer: a cross-sectional population-based observational study.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Melissa Plegue; Masahito Jimbo; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Ananda Sen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Detection of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Yanna Yue; Rong Li; Qian Sun; Chaofeng Hu; Xiaohong Ge; Qingyan Guan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Assessing 10-Year Safety of a Single Negative HPV Test for Cervical Cancer Screening: Evidence from FOCAL-DECADE Cohort.

Authors:  Anna Gottschlich; Dirk van Niekerk; Laurie W Smith; Lovedeep Gondara; Joy Melnikow; Darrel A Cook; Marette Lee; Gavin Stuart; Ruth E Martin; Stuart Peacock; Eduardo L Franco; Andrew Coldman; Mel Krajden; Gina Ogilvie
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Detection of 14 High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses Using Digital LAMP Assays on a Self-Digitization Chip.

Authors:  Jiasi Wang; Jeannette P Staheli; Andrew Wu; Jason E Kreutz; Qiongzheng Hu; Jingang Wang; Thomas Schneider; Bryant S Fujimoto; Yuling Qin; Gloria S Yen; Bob Weng; Kara Shibley; Halia Haynes; Rachel L Winer; Qinghua Feng; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Summary of Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Test Results: 2016-2020.

Authors:  Rebecca B Perkins; Richard L Guido; Mona Saraiya; George F Sawaya; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman; Sarah Feldman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Cotesting in Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Douglas P Malinowski; Molly Broache; Laurence Vaughan; Jeff Andrews; Devin Gary; Harvey W Kaufman; Damian P Alagia; Zhen Chen; Agnieszka Onisko; R Marshall Austin
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Real-world effectiveness of primary screening with high-risk human papillomavirus testing in the cervical cancer screening programme in China: a nationwide, population-based study.

Authors:  Yanxia Zhao; Heling Bao; Lan Ma; Bo Song; Jiangli Di; Linhong Wang; Yanqiu Gao; Wenhui Ren; Shi Wang; Hai-Jun Wang; Jiuling Wu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.