Karen R Flórez1, Denise D Payán2,3, Kartika Palar4, Malcolm V Williams3, Bozena Katic1, Kathryn P Derose3. 1. CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, Merced, California, USA. 3. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Multilevel church-based interventions may help address racial/ethnic disparities in obesity in the United States since churches are often trusted institutions in vulnerable communities. These types of interventions affect at least two levels of socio-ecological influence which could mean an intervention that targets individual congregants as well as the congregation as a whole. However, the extent to which such interventions are developed using a collaborative partnership approach and are effective with diverse racial/ethnic populations is unclear, and these crucial features of well-designed community-based interventions. OBJECTIVE: The present systematic literature review of church-based interventions was conducted to assess their efficacy for addressing obesity across different racial/ethnic groups (eg, African Americans, Latinos). DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: In total, 43 relevant articles were identified using systematic review methods developed by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The extent to which each intervention was developed using community-based participatory research principles, was tailored to the particular community in question, and involved the church in the study development and implementation were also assessed. DATA ANALYSIS: Although 81% of the studies reported significant results for between- or within-group differences according to the study design, effect sizes were reported or could only be calculated in 56% of cases, and most were small. There was also a lack of diversity among samples (eg, few studies involved Latinos, men, young adults, or children), which limits knowledge about the ability of church-based interventions to reduce the burden of obesity more broadly among vulnerable communities of color. Further, few interventions were multilevel in nature, or incorporated strategies at the church or community level. CONCLUSIONS: Church-based interventions to address obesity will have greater impact if they consider the diversity among populations burdened by this condition and develop programs that are tailored to these different populations (eg, men of color, Latinos). Programs could also benefit from employing multilevel approaches to move the field away from behavioral modifications at the individual level and into a more systems-based framework. However, effect sizes will likely remain small, especially since individuals only spend a limited amount of time in this particular setting.
CONTEXT: Multilevel church-based interventions may help address racial/ethnic disparities in obesity in the United States since churches are often trusted institutions in vulnerable communities. These types of interventions affect at least two levels of socio-ecological influence which could mean an intervention that targets individual congregants as well as the congregation as a whole. However, the extent to which such interventions are developed using a collaborative partnership approach and are effective with diverse racial/ethnic populations is unclear, and these crucial features of well-designed community-based interventions. OBJECTIVE: The present systematic literature review of church-based interventions was conducted to assess their efficacy for addressing obesity across different racial/ethnic groups (eg, African Americans, Latinos). DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: In total, 43 relevant articles were identified using systematic review methods developed by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The extent to which each intervention was developed using community-based participatory research principles, was tailored to the particular community in question, and involved the church in the study development and implementation were also assessed. DATA ANALYSIS: Although 81% of the studies reported significant results for between- or within-group differences according to the study design, effect sizes were reported or could only be calculated in 56% of cases, and most were small. There was also a lack of diversity among samples (eg, few studies involved Latinos, men, young adults, or children), which limits knowledge about the ability of church-based interventions to reduce the burden of obesity more broadly among vulnerable communities of color. Further, few interventions were multilevel in nature, or incorporated strategies at the church or community level. CONCLUSIONS: Church-based interventions to address obesity will have greater impact if they consider the diversity among populations burdened by this condition and develop programs that are tailored to these different populations (eg, men of color, Latinos). Programs could also benefit from employing multilevel approaches to move the field away from behavioral modifications at the individual level and into a more systems-based framework. However, effect sizes will likely remain small, especially since individuals only spend a limited amount of time in this particular setting.
Authors: Sara Wilcox; Marilyn Laken; Melissa Bopp; Octavia Gethers; Peng Huang; Lottie McClorin; Allen W Parrott; Rosetta Swinton; Antronette Yancey Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Karen Hye-cheon Kim; Laura Linnan; Marci Kramish Campbell; Christine Brooks; Harold G Koenig; Christopher Wiesen Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2006-12-15
Authors: Lilian G Perez; Deborah A Cohen; Rachana Seelam; Bing Han; Elva M Arredondo; Gabriela Castro; Claudia Rodriguez; Michael A Mata; Anne Larson; Kathryn P Derose Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2022-04-07
Authors: LaPrincess C Brewer; Sarah Jenkins; Sharonne N Hayes; Ashok Kumbamu; Clarence Jones; Lora E Burke; Lisa A Cooper; Christi A Patten Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Stephanie Mazzucca; Elva M Arredondo; Deanna M Hoelscher; Debra Haire-Joshu; Rachel G Tabak; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Ross C Brownson Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 21.870
Authors: Penny A Ralston; Iris Young-Clark; Kandauda A S Wickrama; Catherine Coccia; Jennifer L Lemacks; Arrie M Battle; Celeste Hart; Jasminka Z Ilich Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2022-08-18
Authors: Melissa M Crane; Joselyn L Williams; Chasidy K Garcia; Kandice Jones; Inita N Callaway; Christy C Tangney; Laura Zimmermann; Elizabeth B Lynch Journal: Health Behav Policy Rev Date: 2020-07
Authors: Okelue E Okobi; Olamide O Ajayi; Tobechukwu J Okobi; Ifeoma C Anaya; Oyinlola O Fasehun; Chiamaka S Diala; Endurance O Evbayekha; Abimbola O Ajibowo; Iyanu V Olateju; Joanna J Ekabua; Mireille B Nkongho; Ijeoma O Amanze; Anthonette Taiwo; Ovie Okorare; Ugochi S Ojinnaka; Omosefe E Ogbeifun; Nnenna Chukwuma; Emmanuel J Nebuwa; Janet A Omole; Iboro O Udoete; Rita K Okobi Journal: Cureus Date: 2021-06-20
Authors: Denise D Payán; Kathryn P Derose; Karen R Flórez; Cheryl A Branch; Malcolm V Williams Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 2.830