Literature DB >> 31539006

The nanoGRAVUR framework to group (nano)materials for their occupational, consumer, environmental risks based on a harmonized set of material properties, applied to 34 case studies.

Wendel Wohlleben1, Bryan Hellack, Carmen Nickel, Monika Herrchen, Kerstin Hund-Rinke, Katja Kettler, Christian Riebeling, Andrea Haase, Birgit Funk, Dana Kühnel, Daniel Göhler, Michael Stintz, Christian Schumacher, Martin Wiemann, Johannes Keller, Robert Landsiedel, Dirk Broßell, Sabine Pitzko, Thomas A J Kuhlbusch.   

Abstract

The project nanoGRAVUR (BMBF, 2015-2018) developed a framework for grouping of nanomaterials. Different groups may result for each of the three distinct perspectives of occupational, consumer and environmental safety. The properties, methods and descriptors are harmonised between the three perspectives and are based on: Tier 1 intrinsic physico-chemical properties (what they are) or GHS classification of the non-nano-form (human tox, ecotox, physical hazards); Tier 2 extrinsic physico-chemical properties, release from nano-enabled products, in vitro assays with cells (where they go; what they do); Tier 3 case-specific tests, potentially in vivo studies to substantiate the similarity within groups or application-specific exposure testing. Amongst all properties, dissolution and transformation are least modulated by different nanoforms within one substance, whereas dustiness, dispersion stability, abiotic and especially in vitro surface reactivity vary more often between different nanoforms. The methods developed or selected by nanoGRAVUR fill several gaps highlighted in the ProSafe reviews, and are useful to implement (i) the concept of nanoforms of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and (ii) the concept of discrete forms of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). One cannot assess the significance of a dissimilarity, if the dynamic range of that property is unknown. Benchmark materials span dynamic ranges that enable us to establish bands, often with order-of-magnitude ranges. In 34 case studies we observed high biological similarity within each substance when we compared different (nano)forms of SiO2, BaSO4, kaolin, CeO2, ZnO, organic pigments, especially when we compared forms that are all untreated on the surface. In contrast, different Fe2O3 or TiO2 (nano)forms differ more significantly. The same nanoforms were also integrated in nano-enabled products (NEPs) for automotive coatings, clinker-reduced cements, cosmetic sunscreen, and lightweight polymers.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31539006     DOI: 10.1039/c9nr03306h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  9 in total

1.  Chemical and Colloidal Dynamics of MnO2 Nanosheets in Biological Media Relevant for Nanosafety Assessment.

Authors:  Evan P Gray; Cynthia L Browning; Charles A Vaslet; Kyle D Gion; Allen Green; Muchun Liu; Agnes B Kane; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  Evaluating performance, degradation, and release behavior of a nanoform pigmented coating after natural and accelerated weathering.

Authors:  Ronald S Lankone; Emmanuel Ruggiero; David G Goodwin; Klaus Vilsmeier; Philipp Mueller; Sorin Pulbere; Katie Challis; Yuqiang Bi; Paul Westerhoff; James Ranville; D Howard Fairbrother; Li-Piin Sung; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020

3.  A methodology for developing key events to advance nanomaterial-relevant adverse outcome pathways to inform risk assessment.

Authors:  Sabina Halappanavar; James D Ede; Indrani Mahapatra; Harald F Krug; Eileen D Kuempel; Iseult Lynch; Rob J Vandebriel; Jo Anne Shatkin
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.913

4.  Understanding Dissolution Rates via Continuous Flow Systems with Physiologically Relevant Metal Ion Saturation in Lysosome.

Authors:  Johannes G Keller; Willie Peijnenburg; Kai Werle; Robert Landsiedel; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Lung Toxicity Analysis of Nano-Sized Kaolin and Bentonite: Missing Indications for a Common Grouping.

Authors:  Martin Wiemann; Antje Vennemann; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 6.  Meta-analysis of Bioaccumulation Data for Nondissolvable Engineered Nanomaterials in Freshwater Aquatic Organisms.

Authors:  Yuanfang Zheng; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.218

7.  Aerogels are not regulated as nanomaterials, but can be assessed by tiered testing and grouping strategies for nanomaterials.

Authors:  Johannes G Keller; Martin Wiemann; Sibylle Gröters; Kai Werle; Antje Vennemann; Robert Landsiedel; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-05-19

8.  A Method to Assess the Relevance of Nanomaterial Dissolution During Reactivity Testing.

Authors:  Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Emmanuel Ruggiero; Matthew Boyles; Fiona Murphy; Vicki Stone; Derek A Elam; Kai Werle; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Serum Lowers Bioactivity and Uptake of Synthetic Amorphous Silica by Alveolar Macrophages in a Particle Specific Manner.

Authors:  Martin Wiemann; Antje Vennemann; Cornel Venzago; Gottlieb-Georg Lindner; Tobias B Schuster; Nils Krueger
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.076

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.