Literature DB >> 31538347

Seizure detection based on heart rate variability using a wearable electrocardiography device.

Jesper Jeppesen1,2, Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen1,2, Peter Johansen3, Jakob Christensen4, Stephan Wüstenhagen5, Hatice Tankisi1,2, Erisela Qerama1,2, Alexander Hess1,2, Sándor Beniczky1,2,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of seizure detection based on heart rate variability (HRV) using a wearable electrocardiography (ECG) device. Noninvasive devices for detection of convulsive seizures (generalized tonic-clonic and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) have been validated in phase 2 and 3 studies. However, detection of nonconvulsive seizures still needs further research, since currently available methods have either low sensitivity or an extremely high false alarm rate (FAR).
METHODS: In this phase 2 study, we prospectively recruited patients admitted to long-term video-EEG monitoring (LTM). ECG was recorded using a dedicated wearable device. Seizures were automatically detected using HRV parameters computed off-line, blinded to all other data. We compared the performance of 26 automated algorithms with the seizure time-points marked by experts who reviewed the LTM recording. Patients were classified as responders if >66% of their seizures were detected.
RESULTS: We recruited 100 consecutive patients and analyzed 126 seizures (108 nonconvulsive and 18 convulsive) from 43 patients who had seizures during monitoring. The best-performing HRV algorithm combined a measure of sympathetic activity with a measure of how quickly HR changes occurred. The algorithm identified 53.5% of the patients with seizures as responders. Among responders, detection sensitivity was 93.1% (95% CI: 86.6%-99.6%) for all seizures and 90.5% (95% CI: 77.4%-97.3%) for nonconvulsive seizures. FAR was 1.0/24 h (0.11/night). Median seizure detection latency was 30 s. Typically, patients with prominent autonomic nervous system changes were responders: An ictal change of >50 heartbeats per minute predicted who would be responder with a positive predictive value of 87% and a negative predictive value of 90%. SIGNIFICANCE: The automated HRV algorithm, using ECG recorded with a wearable device, has high sensitivity for detecting seizures, including the nonconvulsive ones. FAR was low during the night. This approach is feasible in patients with prominent ictal autonomic changes. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2019 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated; epilepsy; focal seizures; phase 2 study; seizure alarm

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31538347     DOI: 10.1111/epi.16343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  10 in total

Review 1.  Autonomic manifestations of epilepsy: emerging pathways to sudden death?

Authors:  Roland D Thijs; Philippe Ryvlin; Rainer Surges
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Intra- and Inter-Subject Perspectives on the Detection of Focal Onset Motor Seizures in Epilepsy Patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Böttcher; Elisa Bruno; Nino Epitashvili; Matthias Dümpelmann; Nicolas Zabler; Martin Glasstetter; Valentina Ticcinelli; Sarah Thorpe; Simon Lees; Kristof Van Laerhoven; Mark P Richardson; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  The Role of Heart Rate Variability in the Future of Remote Digital Biomarkers.

Authors:  Andrew P Owens
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Wearable Epileptic Seizure Prediction System with Machine-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection of Heart Rate Variability.

Authors:  Toshitaka Yamakawa; Miho Miyajima; Koichi Fujiwara; Manabu Kano; Yoko Suzuki; Yutaka Watanabe; Satsuki Watanabe; Tohru Hoshida; Motoki Inaji; Taketoshi Maehara
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Communication Requirements in 5G-Enabled Healthcare Applications: Review and Considerations.

Authors:  Haneya Naeem Qureshi; Marvin Manalastas; Aneeqa Ijaz; Ali Imran; Yongkang Liu; Mohamad Omar Al Kalaa
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02

6.  Automated seizure detection with noninvasive wearable devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vaidehi Naganur; Shobi Sivathamboo; Zhibin Chen; Shitanshu Kusmakar; Ana Antonic-Baker; Terence J O'Brien; Patrick Kwan
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 6.740

7.  Impairment of Cardiac Autonomic Nerve Function in Pre-school Children With Intractable Epilepsy.

Authors:  Zhao Yang; Tung-Yang Cheng; Jin Deng; Zhiyan Wang; Xiaoya Qin; Xi Fang; Yuan Yuan; Hongwei Hao; Yuwu Jiang; Jianxiang Liao; Fei Yin; Yanhui Chen; Liping Zou; Baomin Li; Yuxing Gao; Xiaomei Shu; Shaoping Huang; Feng Gao; Jianmin Liang; Luming Li
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Cardiac-based detection of seizures in children with epilepsy.

Authors:  Meghan Hegarty-Craver; Barbara L Kroner; Adrian Bumbut; Samuel J DeFilipp; William D Gaillard; Kristin H Gilchrist
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 9.  Noninvasive detection of focal seizures in ambulatory patients.

Authors:  Philippe Ryvlin; Leila Cammoun; Ilona Hubbard; France Ravey; Sandor Beniczky; David Atienza
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Performance of ECG-based seizure detection algorithms strongly depends on training and test conditions.

Authors:  Amirhossein Jahanbekam; Jan Baumann; Robert D Nass; Christian Bauckhage; Holger Hill; Christian E Elger; Rainer Surges
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2021-07-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.