| Literature DB >> 31538317 |
Liyun He1, Guoming Zhang1, Meng Wei1, Yanjun Zhao1, Weixing Chen2, Qiaojun Peng3, Guiyun Meng4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to examine the effect of individual dietary intervention on nutrition and oxidative stress of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complicated by pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in Xinjiang.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary intervention; Pulmonary tuberculosis; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31538317 PMCID: PMC6848526 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-00691-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Ther Impact factor: 2.945
Fig. 1Study algorithm
Comparison of demographic data between the two groups (n = 164)
| Index | Group | Control group ( | Experimental group ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||||
| Age (years) | 18–40 | 18 | 56.3 | 14 | 43.8 | 1.672 | 0.433 |
| 41–59 | 31 | 44.3 | 39 | 55.7 | |||
| ≥ 60 | 33 | 53.2 | 29 | 46.8 | |||
| Sex | Male | 49 | 52.1 | 45 | 47.9 | 0.399 | 0.528 |
| Female | 33 | 47.1 | 37 | 52.9 | |||
| Labor intensity | Light | 45 | 46.9 | 51 | 53.1 | 0.995 | 0.608 |
| Medium | 25 | 53.2 | 22 | 46.8 | |||
| Heavy | 12 | 57.1 | 9 | 42.9 | |||
| Marital status | Married | 65 | 80.0 | 70 | 85.4 | 0.837 | 0.360 |
| Unmarried | 17 | 20.0 | 12 | 14.6 | |||
| Diabetes treatment | Hypoglycemic drug | 21 | 46.7 | 24 | 53.3 | 1.106 | 0.575 |
| Insulin injection | 35 | 47.9 | 38 | 52.1 | |||
| Hypoglycemic drug + insulin injection | 26 | 56.5 | 20 | 43.5 | |||
| Disease course (years) | ≤ 5 | 20 | 24.4 | 23 | 28.0 | 0.470 | 0.791 |
| 6–10 | 27 | 32.9 | 28 | 34.1 | |||
| ≥ 11 | 35 | 42.7 | 31 | 37.8 | |||
Comparison of variables related to nutrition and oxidative stress between the two groups before and after intervention (, n = 164)
| Control group ( | Experimental group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALB (mg/dL) | ||||
| Before intervention | 3627.00 ± 465 | 3533.00 ± 478 | 1.28 | 0.20 |
| After intervention | 3829.00 ± 371 | 4007.00 ± 426 | − 2.85 | 0.01 |
| Hb (mg/dL) | ||||
| Before intervention | 11,487.00 ± 906 | 11,524.00 ± 1185 | − 0.23 | 0.82 |
| After intervention | 12,038.00 ± 1134 | 12,474.00 ± 1272 | − 2.32 | 0.02 |
| TLC (× 109/L) | ||||
| Before intervention | 1.47 ± 0.51 | 1.53 ± 0.38 | − 0.73 | 0.47 |
| After intervention | 1.61 ± 0.53 | 1.78 ± 0.45 | − 2.35 | 0.02 |
| BMI | ||||
| Before intervention | 22.08 ± 0.97 | 22.45 ± 1.61 | − 1.79 | 0.08 |
| After intervention | 22.63 ± 0.99 | 23.05 ± 1.25 | − 2.40 | 0.02 |
| SOD (U/ml) | ||||
| Before intervention | 315.03 ± 93.42 | 303.28 ± 76.02 | 0.88 | 0.38 |
| After intervention | 323.40 ± 57.34 | 343.82 ± 53.32 | − 2.36 | 0.02 |
| MDA (nmol/ml) | ||||
| Before intervention | 6.45 ± 1.77 | 6.00 ± 1.45 | 1.77 | 0.08 |
| After intervention | 5.85 ± 1.70 | 5.34 ± 1.42 | 2.09 | 0.04 |
| VC (μmol/L) | ||||
| Before intervention | 39.24 ± 6.09 | 38.97 ± 7.10 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| After intervention | 41.45 ± 4.85 | 43.30 ± 6.39 | − 2.08 | 0.04 |
| VE (μmol/L) | ||||
| Before intervention | 17.23 ± 6.51 | 17.56 ± 5.98 | − 0.34 | 0.74 |
| After intervention | 19.19 ± 4.74 | 20.86 ± 5.34 | − 2.11 | 0.04 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | ||||
| Before intervention | 10.82 ± 1.64 | 10.35 ± 1.70 | 1.83 | 0.07 |
| After intervention | 8.89 ± 1.98 | 8.09 ± 1.64 | 2.82 | 0.01 |
| 2hPG (mmol/L) | ||||
| Before intervention | 14.53 ± 2.72 | 14.74 ± 2.63 | − 0.51 | 0.61 |
| After intervention | 11.43 ± 1.94 | 10.61 ± 1.77 | 2.84 | 0.01 |
| HbA1c (%) | ||||
| Before intervention | 10.50 ± 2.19 | 10.38 ± 2.05 | 0.34 | 0.74 |
| After intervention | 8.87 ± 1.96 | 8.13 ± 1.83 | 2.51 | 0.01 |
| C-peptide (ng/ml) | ||||
| Before intervention | 1.49 ± 0.93 | 1.61 ± 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.39 |
| After intervention | 1.32 ± 0.94 | 1.03 ± 0.57 | 2.39 | 0.01 |
| TCI [kcal/(kg day)] | ||||
| Before intervention | 1494.71 ± 212.18 | 1535.02 ± 228.27 | 1.17 | 0.24 |
| After intervention | 1691.12 ± 245.25 | 1784.76 ± 252.08 | 2.41 | 0.01 |
ALB albumin, Hb hemoglobin, TLC total lymphocyte count, BMI body mass index, SOD superoxide dismutase, MDA malondialdehyde, VC vitamin C, VE vitamin E, FPG fasting plasma glucose, 2hPG 2-h plasma glucose, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, TCI total calorie intake
Comparison of proportion of patients with sputum positive for bacteria between the two groups before and after intervention, n (%)
| Group | Before intervention | After intervention | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 82 | 34 (41.5%) | 23 (28%) |
| Experimental group | 82 | 27 (32.9%) | 12 (14.6%) |
| 1.28 | 4.4 | ||
| 0.26 | 0.04 |