OBJECTIVE: Fibrosis from chest irradiation could lower the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of breast tissue. ADC values of normal breast tissue in high-risk women who underwent mantle radiation before age 30 years were compared with a screening control group matched for breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 21 women with a history of mantle radiation who underwent breast MRI examinations between 2008 and 2013, and 20 nonirradiated patients (control group) imaged during the same period with matching FGT and similar age. The women were dichotomized into low FGT (10/20, 50%) and high-FGT (10/20, 50%) groups, based on BI-RADS descriptors. All MRI examinations included diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b = 0, 1000); ADC maps were generated and evaluated on PACS workstations by two radiologists in agreement. Region of interest markers were placed on ADC maps in visualized breast tissue in the retroareolar region of each breast. The ADC value was averaged for the right and left breast in each patient included in the study. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the ADC values in the irradiated patients and the matched control patients. RESULTS: The median breast ADC was lower in the irradiated group (1.32 × 10-3mm2/sec) than in the control group (1.62 × 10-3mm2/sec; P = 0.0089). Low FGT in the irradiated group had a lower median ADC (1.25 × 10-3mm2/sec) than it did in the control group (1.53 × 10-3mm2/sec). Irradiated high-FGT breasts had a median ADC (1.52 × 10-3mm2/sec), as compared with nonirradiated control patients with high FGT (1.82 × 10-3mm2/sec). CONCLUSION: Previously irradiated breasts have lower ADC values than do nonirradiated breasts.
OBJECTIVE: Fibrosis from chest irradiation could lower the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of breast tissue. ADC values of normal breast tissue in high-risk women who underwent mantle radiation before age 30 years were compared with a screening control group matched for breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 21 women with a history of mantle radiation who underwent breast MRI examinations between 2008 and 2013, and 20 nonirradiated patients (control group) imaged during the same period with matching FGT and similar age. The women were dichotomized into low FGT (10/20, 50%) and high-FGT (10/20, 50%) groups, based on BI-RADS descriptors. All MRI examinations included diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b = 0, 1000); ADC maps were generated and evaluated on PACS workstations by two radiologists in agreement. Region of interest markers were placed on ADC maps in visualized breast tissue in the retroareolar region of each breast. The ADC value was averaged for the right and left breast in each patient included in the study. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the ADC values in the irradiated patients and the matched control patients. RESULTS: The median breast ADC was lower in the irradiated group (1.32 × 10-3mm2/sec) than in the control group (1.62 × 10-3mm2/sec; P = 0.0089). Low FGT in the irradiated group had a lower median ADC (1.25 × 10-3mm2/sec) than it did in the control group (1.53 × 10-3mm2/sec). Irradiated high-FGT breasts had a median ADC (1.52 × 10-3mm2/sec), as compared with nonirradiated control patients with high FGT (1.82 × 10-3mm2/sec). CONCLUSION: Previously irradiated breasts have lower ADC values than do nonirradiated breasts.
Entities:
Keywords:
apparent diffusion coefficient; breast MRI; diffusion-weighted imaging; fibroglandular breast tissue; mantle radiation
Authors: Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Wendy B DeMartini; Brenda F Kurland; Peter R Eby; Steven W White; Constance D Lehman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Elena B Elkin; Michelle L Klem; Anne Marie Gonzales; Nicole M Ishill; David Hodgson; Andrea K Ng; Lawrence B Marks; Joanne Weidhaas; Gary M Freedman; Robert C Miller; Louis S Constine; Sten Myrehaug; Joachim Yahalom Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Lisa Singer; Ryan Sun; Lisa J Wilmes; Catherine S Klifa; Constance D Lehman; Nola M Hylton Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Carol H Lee; D David Dershaw; Daniel Kopans; Phil Evans; Barbara Monsees; Debra Monticciolo; R James Brenner; Lawrence Bassett; Wendie Berg; Stephen Feig; Edward Hendrick; Ellen Mendelson; Carl D'Orsi; Edward Sickles; Linda Warren Burhenne Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Andrea K Ng; Judy E Garber; Lisa R Diller; Robyn L Birdwell; Yang Feng; Donna S Neuberg; Barbara Silver; David C Fisher; Karen J Marcus; Peter M Mauch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ava Kwong; Steven L Hancock; Joan R Bloom; Sunita Pal; Robyn L Birdwell; Carol Mariscal; Debra M Ikeda Journal: Breast J Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Vivianne Freitas; Anabel Scaranelo; Ravi Menezes; Supriya Kulkarni; David Hodgson; Pavel Crystal Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lisa B Kenney; Yutaka Yasui; Peter D Inskip; Sue Hammond; Joseph P Neglia; Ann C Mertens; Anna T Meadows; Debra Friedman; Leslie L Robison; Lisa Diller Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-10-19 Impact factor: 51.598