| Literature DB >> 31537977 |
Mariia Kokina1, Ana Salević1, Ana Kalušević1,2, Steva Lević1, Milena Pantić1, Dejan Pljevljakušić3, Katarina Šavikin3, Mark Shamtsyan4, Miomir Nikšić1, Viktor Nedović1.
Abstract
The study assessed the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of commonly used and commercially available essential oils as an alternative to synthetic preservatives. The plant sources were as follows: lavender (Lavandula angustifolia), tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia), bergamot (Citrus bergamia) and peppermint (Mentha piperita). The antioxidant activity of essential oils was tested by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2´-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) methods. The microdilution broth susceptibility assay revealed that lavender and bergamot essential oils were more efficient in inhibiting the bacterial growth than other tested oils, with the minimum inhibitory concentration of 5 μg/mL. This study also reports the successful implementation of an electrostatic extrusion technique for encapsulating essential oils into alginate beads, which enables the essential oils to maintain their free radical scavenging ability over time.Entities:
Keywords: alginate; essential oils; high volatility; natural preservatives
Year: 2019 PMID: 31537977 PMCID: PMC6718957 DOI: 10.17113/ftb.57.02.19.5957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Technol Biotechnol ISSN: 1330-9862 Impact factor: 3.918
Compounds identified in tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia), lavender (Lavandula angustifolia), bergamot (Citrus bergamia) and peppermint (Mentha piperita) essential oils
| Compound | RI | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tea tree | Lavender | Bergamot | Peppermint | |||||||
| α-thujene | 924.9 | 0.86 | 0.16 | – | 0.83 | |||||
| α-pinene | 930.3 | 2.57 | – | 0.15 | 1.15 | |||||
| camphene | 944.5 | – | 0.13 | – | – | |||||
| β-pinene | 972.9 | 0.70 | – | 0.78 | – | |||||
| sabinene | 973.2 | – | 0.14 | – | 0.51 | |||||
| myrcene | 992.5 | 0.75 | 0.19 | 0.37 | – | |||||
| α-phellandrene | 1003.7 | 0.33 | 0.26 | – | – | |||||
| n.i. | 1011.1 | – | – | – | 0.17 | |||||
| α-terpinene | 1015.5 | 7.84 | 0.75 | – | – | |||||
| 1024.4 | 5.15 | 0.21 | 1.03 | 0.19 | ||||||
| β-phellandrene | 1027.4 | 1.54 | – | – | – | |||||
| limonene | 1028.4 | – | – | 6.67 | – | |||||
| 1,8-cineole | 1028.6 | 3.15 | 1.88 | – | 1.71 | |||||
| sylvestrene | 1029.0 | – | 0.67 | – | – | |||||
| γ-terpinene | 1058.1 | 19.47 | 0.15 | 1.39 | 0.13 | |||||
| 1063.8 | – | 0.21 | – | 0.34 | ||||||
| 1070.2 | – | 0.10 | – | 0.87 | ||||||
| 1102.0 | – | – | – | 0.11 | ||||||
| 1073.2 | – | 0.65 | 0.26 | – | ||||||
| terpinolene | 1087.7 | 3.21 | – | – | – | |||||
| 1089.8 | – | 0.61 | 0.23 | – | ||||||
| linalool | 1105.0 | – | 35.68 | 22.93 | 0.38 | |||||
| 1-octen-3-yl acetate | 1116.5 | – | 0.66 | – | – | |||||
| n.i. | 1121.3 | – | – | – | 0.08 | |||||
| camphor | 1141.8 | – | 0.64 | – | – | |||||
| menthofuran | 1162.8 | – | – | – | 7.16 | |||||
| menthol | 1166.8 | – | – | – | 3.39 | |||||
| borneol | 1167.4 | – | 1.75 | – | – | |||||
| isomenthol | 1176.6 | – | – | – | 49.30 | |||||
| terpinen-4-ol | 1178.5 | 44.72 | 3.94 | 0.49 | – | |||||
| neoisomenthol | 1184.6 | – | – | – | 0.99 | |||||
| α-terpineol | 1194.6 | 3.11 | 0.44 | 0.33 | – | |||||
| hexyl isovalerate | 1245.1 | – | 0.32 | – | – | |||||
| pulegone | 1240.9 | – | – | – | 1.57 | |||||
| ascaridole | 1241.0 | – | – | 0.24 | – | |||||
| linalool acetate | 1258.6 | 0.24 | 42.25 | 57.51 | – | |||||
| n.i. | 1258.7 | – | – | 0.33 | – | |||||
| piperitone | 1259.6 | – | – | – | 0.29 | |||||
| n.i. | 1264.6 | – | – | 0.41 | – | |||||
| neomenthyl acetate | 1276.8 | – | – | – | 0.23 | |||||
| lavandulyl acetate | 1294.8 | – | 1.72 | – | – | |||||
| menthyl acetate | 1295.4 | – | – | – | 5.63 | |||||
| isomenthyl acetate | 1309.4 | – | – | – | 0.17 | |||||
| hexyl tiglate | 1337.9 | – | 0.17 | – | – | |||||
| n.i. | 1348.2 | – | 0.20 | – | – | |||||
| n.i. | 1356.4 | – | 0.28 | – | – | |||||
| n.i. | 1362.2 | – | 0.34 | – | – | |||||
| terpinyl acetate | 1351.6 | – | – | 0.71 | – | |||||
| neryl acetate | 1369.3 | – | 0.52 | 1.87 | – | |||||
| Compound | RI | | ||||||||
| Tea tree | Lavender | Bergamot | Peppermint | |||||||
| β-bourbonene | 1381.6 | – | – | – | 0.29 | |||||
| geranyl acetate | 1388.6 | – | 0.85 | 0.72 | – | |||||
| n.i. | 1405.2 | – | – | 0.62 | – | |||||
| sesquithujene | 1405.7 | – | 0.12 | – | – | |||||
| α-gurjunene | 1406.3 | 0.32 | – | – | – | |||||
| 1416.4 | 0.35 | 0.91 | 0.47 | 1.79 | ||||||
| α- | 1434.6 | – | – | 0.39 | – | |||||
| aromadendrene | 1435.5 | 1.25 | – | – | – | |||||
| α-humulene | 1451.3 | 0.50 | 0.13 | – | – | |||||
| alloaromaden- | 1458.2 | 0.30 | – | – | – | |||||
| 1459.1 | – | 0.04 | – | – | ||||||
| 1472.4 | 1.31 | – | – | – | ||||||
| 1479.8 | – | 0.11 | – | – | ||||||
| germacrene D | 1479.8 | – | – | – | 1.00 | |||||
| valencene | 1493.2 | 1.51 | – | – | – | |||||
| β-bisabolene | 1510.7 | – | – | 2.08 | – | |||||
| lavandulyl isovalerate | 1512.6 | – | 0.42 | – | – | |||||
| γ-cadinene | 1513.2 | – | 0.21 | – | – | |||||
| 1523.1 | 0.44 | – | – | – | ||||||
| 1531.9 | 0.39 | – | – | – | ||||||
| caryophyllene oxide | 1580.9 | – | 1.31 | – | – | |||||
| Sum of identified | 100.00 | 98.30 | 98.64 | 99.72 | ||||||
RI=retention index relative to n-alkanes on HP-5 capillary column, n.i.=not identified
Free radical scavenging capacities of the essential oils measured by the DPPH and ABTS methods
| Plant source | Fresh | After 12 months | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lavender | (18.9±0.2)a | (48.6±0.7) a | (11.9±0.2)a | (22.3±0.3)a |
| Bergamot | (17.0±0.4)a | (99.0±1.0)b | (9.6±0.9)a | (62.8±0.3)b |
| Tea tree | (7.6±1.0)b | (168.7±1.4)c | (5.8±0.2)b | (120.2±0.8)c |
| Peppermint | (23.3±1.0)c | (190.9±2.5)d | (16.5±0.4)c | (141.6±0.8)d |
Expressed as Trolox equivalent per litre of the essential oil solution. Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation (N=3). Mean values with a different letter in superscript within the same column are significantly different from each other (Tukey-Kramer post hoc test, p<0.05)
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils
| Plant source | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC/(µg/mL) | MBC/(µg/mL) | MIC/(µg/mL) | MBC/(µg/mL) | |
| Lavender | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| Bergamot | 5 | >10 | 5 | 10 |
| Tea tree | 10 | 10 | 10 | >10 |
| Peppermint | 10 | 10 | 10 | >10 |
MIC=minimum inhibitory concentration, MBC=minimum bactericidal concentration
Morphological characteristics of the beads
| Sample | | SF | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet | Dried | Wet | Dried | ||
| Blank | 2.00±0.04 | 1. 4±0.2 | 0.233 | 0.391 | 0.302 |
| Lavender | 1.51±0.07 | 0.9±0.2 | 0.241 | 0.521 | 0.397 |
| Bergamot | 1.6±0.9 | 1.2±0.1 | 0.294 | 0.407 | 0.367 |
| Tea tree | 1.58±0.08 | 1. 1±0.1 | 0.238 | 0.541 | 0.331 |
| Peppermint | 1.46±0.09 | 1.0±0.1 | 0.225 | 0.402 | 0.348 |
SF=sphericity factor of the beads before and after freeze drying, kSF(drying)=shrinkage factor of the beads after freeze drying. Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation (N=15)
Fig. 1Alginate/essential oil beads before (1=blank, 2=lavender, 3=bergamot, 4=tea tree, 5=peppermint) and after (1*–5* respectively) freeze drying