Literature DB >> 31537651

Wings as inertial appendages: how bats recover from aerial stumbles.

David B Boerma1, Kenneth S Breuer2,3, Tim L Treskatis4, Sharon M Swartz2,3.   

Abstract

For many animals, movement through complex natural environments necessitates the evolution of mechanisms that enable recovery from unexpected perturbations. Knowledge of how flying animals contend with disruptive forces is limited, however, and is nearly nonexistent for bats, the only mammals capable of powered flight. We investigated perturbation recovery in Carollia perspicillata by administering a well-defined jet of compressed air, equal to 2.5 times bodyweight, which induced two types of disturbances, termed aerial stumbles: pitch-inducing body perturbations and roll-inducing wing perturbations. In both cases, bats responded primarily by adjusting extension of wing joints, and recovered pre-disturbance body orientation and left-right symmetry of wing motions over the course of only one wingbeat cycle. Bats recovered from body perturbations by symmetrically extending their wings cranially and dorsally during upstroke, and from wing perturbations by asymmetrically extending their wings throughout the recovery wingbeat. We used a simplified dynamical model to test the hypothesis that wing extension asymmetry during recovery from roll-inducing perturbations can generate inertial torques that alone are sufficient to produce the observed body reorientation. Results supported the hypothesis, and also suggested that subsequent restoration of symmetrical wing extension help to decelerate recovery rotation via passive aerodynamic mechanisms. During recovery, humeral elevation/depression remained largely unchanged while bats adjusted wing extension at the elbow and wrist, suggesting a proximo-distal gradient in the neuromechanical control of the wing.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bats; Biomechanics; Flight; Inertial maneuvers; Perturbation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31537651     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  3 in total

1.  Turning-ascending flight of a Hipposideros pratti bat.

Authors:  Aevelina Rahman; Peter Windes; Danesh Tafti
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Dragondrop: a novel passive mechanism for aerial righting in the dragonfly.

Authors:  Samuel T Fabian; Rui Zhou; Huai-Ti Lin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Bird wings act as a suspension system that rejects gusts.

Authors:  Jorn A Cheney; Jonathan P J Stevenson; Nicholas E Durston; Jialei Song; James R Usherwood; Richard J Bomphrey; Shane P Windsor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.