Literature DB >> 31537616

Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise.

William Simkulet1.   

Abstract

The contemporary philosophical literature on abortion primarily revolves around three seemingly intractable debates, concerning the (1) moral status of the fetus, (2) scope of women's rights and (3) moral relevance of the killing/letting die distinction. The possibility of ectogenesis-technology that would allow a fetus to develop outside of a gestational mother's womb-presents a unique opportunity for moral compromise. Here, I argue those opposed to abortion have a prima facie moral obligation to pursue ectogenesis technology and provide ectogenesis for disconnected fetuses as part of a moral compromise. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Killing/Letting die distinction; abortion; ectogenesis; moral compromise; personhood

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31537616     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.

Authors:  Seppe Segers
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Reviewing the womb.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chloe Romanis; Dunja Begović; Margot R Brazier; Alexandra Katherine Mullock
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.