Literature DB >> 31537324

Laparoscopic omental patch for perforated peptic ulcer disease reduces length of stay and complications, compared to open surgery: A SWSC multicenter study.

Adel Alhaj Saleh1, Esteban C Esquivel1, John T Lung1, Barbara C Eaton2, Brandon R Bruns2, Galinos Barmparas3, Daniel R Margulies3, Alexander Raines4, Cressilee Bryant4, Christopher E Crane5, Elizabeth P Scherer5, Thomas J Schroeppel6, Eliza Moskowitz6, Justin Regner7, Richard Frazee7, Eric M Campion8, Matthew Bartley8, Jared Mortus9, Jeremy Ward9, Mhd Hasan Almekdash10, Sharmila Dissanaike11.   

Abstract

RCTs showed benefits in Lap repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). The SWSC Multi-Center Trials Group sought to evaluate whether Lap omental patch repairs compared to Open improved outcomes in PPU in general practice. Data was collected from 9 SWSC Trial Group centers. Demographics, operative time, 30-day complications, length of stay and mortality were included. 461 PATIENTS: Open in 311(67%) patients, Lap in 132(28%) with 20(5%) patients converted from Lap to Open. Groups were similar at baseline. Significant variability was found between centers in their utilization of Lap (0-67%). Complications at 30 days were lower in Lap (18.5% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.05) as was unplanned re-operation (4.7% vs 14%, p < 0.05). Lap reduced LOS (6 vs 8 days, p < 0.001). Ileus was more in Lap (42% vs 18 p < 0.001) operative time was 14 min higher in Lap(p < 0.01) and admission to OR time was 4 h higher in Lap(<0.05). No significant difference readmission or mortality. Our results suggest Lap should be considered a first-line option in suitable PPU patients requiring omental patch repair in centers that have the capacity and resources 24/7.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31537324     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment for Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation: a Nationwide Study of 14,918 Inpatients in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Ryosuke Kumazawa; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcers: analysis of outcomes and identification of predictive factors of conversion.

Authors:  Dario Tartaglia; Silvia Strambi; Federico Coccolini; Alessio Mazzoni; Mario Miccoli; Camilla Cremonini; Enrico Cicuttin; Massimo Chiarugi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-03

3.  Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio Associated with Prolonged Hospital Length of Stay Postpeptic Ulcer Perforation Repair: An Observational Descriptive Analysis.

Authors:  Omer Al-Yahri; Tamer Saafan; Husham Abdelrahman; Ammar Aleter; Ali Toffaha; Mustafa Hajjar; Hesham Aljohary; Rashad Alfkey; Ahmad Zarour; Saif Al-Mudares; Ayman El-Menyar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Potential use of peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score as a conversion index of laparoscopic-perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) repair.

Authors:  Yu-Hao Wang; Yu-Tung Wu; Chih-Yuan Fu; Chien-Hung Liao; Chi-Tung Cheng; Chi-Hsun Hsieh
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Empiric antifungals do not decrease the risk for organ space infection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Adel Alhaj Saleh; Raymond Huang; Barbara C Eaton; Brandon R Bruns; Alexander Raines; Cressilee Bryant; Christopher E Crane; Elizabeth P Scherer; Thomas J Schroeppel; Eliza Moskowitz; Justin L Regner; Richard Frazee; Eric M Campion; Matthew Bartley; Jared R Mortus; Jeremy Ward; Daniel R Margulies; Sharmila Dissanaike
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-05-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.