| Literature DB >> 31537324 |
Adel Alhaj Saleh1, Esteban C Esquivel1, John T Lung1, Barbara C Eaton2, Brandon R Bruns2, Galinos Barmparas3, Daniel R Margulies3, Alexander Raines4, Cressilee Bryant4, Christopher E Crane5, Elizabeth P Scherer5, Thomas J Schroeppel6, Eliza Moskowitz6, Justin Regner7, Richard Frazee7, Eric M Campion8, Matthew Bartley8, Jared Mortus9, Jeremy Ward9, Mhd Hasan Almekdash10, Sharmila Dissanaike11.
Abstract
RCTs showed benefits in Lap repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). The SWSC Multi-Center Trials Group sought to evaluate whether Lap omental patch repairs compared to Open improved outcomes in PPU in general practice. Data was collected from 9 SWSC Trial Group centers. Demographics, operative time, 30-day complications, length of stay and mortality were included. 461 PATIENTS: Open in 311(67%) patients, Lap in 132(28%) with 20(5%) patients converted from Lap to Open. Groups were similar at baseline. Significant variability was found between centers in their utilization of Lap (0-67%). Complications at 30 days were lower in Lap (18.5% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.05) as was unplanned re-operation (4.7% vs 14%, p < 0.05). Lap reduced LOS (6 vs 8 days, p < 0.001). Ileus was more in Lap (42% vs 18 p < 0.001) operative time was 14 min higher in Lap(p < 0.01) and admission to OR time was 4 h higher in Lap(<0.05). No significant difference readmission or mortality. Our results suggest Lap should be considered a first-line option in suitable PPU patients requiring omental patch repair in centers that have the capacity and resources 24/7.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31537324 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Surg ISSN: 0002-9610 Impact factor: 2.565