| Literature DB >> 31537128 |
Ming Zeng1, Wei Liu2, Xiaoming Zha3, Shaowen Tang4, Jin Liu5, Guang Yang1, Huijuan Mao1, Xiangbao Yu1, Bin Sun1, Bo Zhang1, Chun Ouyang1, Lina Zhang6, Jing Guo1, Jing Wang1, Yaoyu Huang1, Yogendranath Purrunsing1, Hanyang Qian1, Ningning Wang1, Changying Xing1.
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate preoperative parathyroid localization is important for successful parathyroidectomy (PTX). The aim of our study was to investigate whether SPECT/CT has enhanced effect in preoperative localization of parathyroids.Entities:
Keywords: Secondary hyperparathyroidism; dual-phase Tc-MIBI scintigraphy; parathyroid; parathyroidectomy; single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31537128 PMCID: PMC6758704 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1662804
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Figure 1.Flow chart of the study population.
Clinical characteristics and laboratory results.
| Variable | Group A ( | Group B ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Age (y) | 46.99 ± 10.63 | 46.63 ± 11.40 | .717 |
| Gender (male/female) | 92/83 | 225/169 | .315 |
| Height (cm) | 164.08 ± 9.07 | 165.10 ± 8.60 | .203 |
| Weight (Kg) | 58.53 ± 12.45 | 60.42 ± 11.51 | .081 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.62 ± 3.45 | 22.12 ± 3.59 | .129 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 138.75 ± 19.90 | 139.03 ± 19.56 | .877 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 84.66 ± 11.24 | 85.82 ± 12.38 | .293 |
| Type of dialysis, | |||
| HD | 167 (95.43%) | 361 (91.62%) | .105 |
| PD | 8 (4.57%) | 33 (8.38%) | .105 |
| Duration of dialysis (m) | 96.00 (60.00, 120.00) | 84.00 (60.00, 120.00) | .378 |
| Cause of ESRD, | |||
| Chronic glomerulonephritis | 155 (88.57%) | 332 (84.26%) | .177 |
| Diabetic nephropathy | 2 (1.14%) | 3 (0.76) | 1.000 |
| Hypertensive nephropathy | 2 (1.14%) | 14 (3.55%) | .183 |
| Polycystic kidney | 6 (3.43%) | 17 (4.31%) | .620 |
| Other | 10 (5.71%) | 28 (7.11%) | .539 |
| Laboratory values | |||
| Calcium (mmol/L) | 2.57 ± 0.24 | 2.55 ± 0.44 | .412 |
| Phosphorus (mmol/L) | 2.16 ± 0.57 | 2.19 ± 0.50 | .285 |
| AKP (u/L) | 380.80 (169.20, 835.93) | 318.00 (178.48, 739.03) | – |
| ln AKP | 5.89 ± 0.94 | 5.85 ± 0.90 | .604 |
| Calcium (mmol/L) | 2.57 ± 0.24 | 2.55 ± 0.44 | .412 |
| Phosphorus (mmol/L) | 2.16 ± 0.57 | 2.19 ± 0.50 | .285 |
| Preoperative iPTH (pg/mL) | 2008.30 (1363.10, 2721.50) | 1925.95 (1320.10, 2684.68) | .238 |
| D1-iPTH (pg/mL) | 9.50 (5.10, 19.30) | 8.95 (5.20, 15.63) | .232 |
| D4-iPTH (pg/mL) | 5.40 (2.30, 13.70) | 5.70 (3.00, 17.65) | .500 |
Data were mean ± standard deviation (SD), or numbers and percentages, or median (25–75th percentile), as appropriate. Significance between the two groups were obtained from Independent-Samples t test or Wilcoxon’s rank sum test for continuous variables and Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
BMI: body mass index; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; HD: Hemodialysis; PD: Peritoneal dialysis; ESRD: end stage renal disease; AKP: alkaline phosphatase; iPTH: intact parathyroid hormone; D1-iPTH: iPTH level on the first day after surgery; D4-iPTH: iPTH level on the fourth day after surgery.
Preoperative imaging and postoperative parathyroid pathology results of two groups.
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RU | RL | LU | LL | Total | RU | RL | LU | LL | Total | |
| TP | 83 | 128 | 105 | 124 | 440 | 263 | 334 | 299 | 316 | 1212 |
| FP | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 17 |
| FN | 83 | 38 | 65 | 38 | 224 | 116 | 37 | 84 | 59 | 296 |
| TN | 8 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 16 | 51 |
| Se (%) (95%CI) | 50.0 (42.2–57.8) | 77.1 (70.0–83.3) | 61.8 (54.0–69.1) | 76.5 (69.3–82.8) | 66.3 (62.5–69.9) | 69.4 (64.5–74.0) | 90.0 (86.5–92.9) | 78.1 (73.6–82.1) | 84.3 (80.2–87.8) | 80.4 (78.3–82.3) |
| Sp (%) (95%CI) | 88.9 (51.8–99.7) | 66.7 (29.9–92.5) | 60.0 (14.7–94.7) | 61.5 (31.6–86.1) | 69.4 (51.9–83.7) | 73.3 (44.9–92.2) | 60.9 (38.5–80.3) | 90.9 (58.7–99.8) | 84.2 (60.4–96.6) | 75.0 (63.0–84.7) |
| PLR (95%CI) | 4.50 (0.71–28.74) | 2.31 (0.92–5.85) | 1.54 (0.52–4.54) | 1.99 (0.99–3.98) | 2.17 (1.32–3.56) | 2.60 (1.12–6.04) | 2.30 (1.38–3.83) | 8.59 (1.32–55.69) | 5.34 (1.89–15.09) | 3.22 (2.13–4.86) |
| NLR (95%CI) | 0.56 (0.43–0.74) | 0.34 (0.20–0.59) | 0.64 (0.30–1.34) | 0.38 (0.23–0.64) | 0.49 (0.38–0.62) | 0.42 (0.30–0.59) | 0.16 (0.11–0.26) | 0.24 (0.18–0.32) | 0.19 (0.14–0.25) | 0.26 (0.22–0.31) |
| CR (%) (95%CI) | 52.00 | 76.57a | 61.7a | 75.43b | 66.43 | 69.54c | 88.32ac | 78.43c | 84.26bc | 80.14d |
FN: False Negative; FP: False Positive; TN: True Negative; TP: True Positive; Se: Sensitivity; Sp: Specificity; PLR: Positive Likelihood Ratio; NLR: Negative Likelihood Ratio; CR: Concordance rate; RU: right upper gland; RL: right lower gland; LU: left upper gland; LL: left lower gland.
aRL compared with RU in the same group, p < .001.
bLL compared with LU in the same group, p < .05.
cRU, RL, LU and LL in group B compared with of group A, p < .05.
dTotal sensitivity and concordance rate in group B compared with group A, p < .001.
Comparison of eutopic and ectopic parathyroids between the two groups.
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Eutopic parathyroids | ||
| TP | 440 | 1212 |
| FP | 11 | 17 |
| FN | 224 | 296 |
| Se (%) (95%CI) | 66.3 (62.5–69.9) | 80.4 |
| Ectopic parathyroids | ||
| TP | 9 | 19 |
| FP | 0 | 1 |
| FN | 2 | 2 |
| Se (%) (95%CI) | 81.8 (48.2–97.7) | 90.5 (69.6–98.8) |
TP: True Positive; FP: False Positive; FN: False Negative; Se: Sensitivity.
aGroup B compared with group A, p < .001.
Figure 2.Comparison of planar imaging and SPECT/CT fusion imaging of a 46-year-old man in group B.
Figure 3.A 55-year-old woman with anterior mediastinum ectopic parathyroid.