Literature DB >> 31536710

"Evaluation of crestal bone loss around straight and tilted implants in patients rehabilitated by immediate-loaded full-arch. A prospective study.

Alessandro Cucchi1, Dr Ssa Elisabetta Vignudelli2, Dr Ssa Simonetta Franco2, Dr Paolo Ghensi3, Prof Luciano Malchiodi4, Prof Giuseppe Corinaldesi2.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to compare implant success rate and crestal bone loss around tilted and straight implants supporting immediate loading full-arch rehabilitations. Twenty consecutive patients with edentulous jaws treated between June 2013 and July 2015 that satisfy all inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. All patientswere rehabilitated through a full-arch restoration supported by four or six immediately loaded implants.Clinical and radiographic examinations were scheduled every 12 months to evaluate implant success rates and crestal bone levels. Significant differences in crestal bone levels and success rates between straight and tilted implants were investigated by means of independent statistical analysis and differences were regarded as significant if p < 0.05.70 straight and 50 tilted implants were placed to rehabilitate 14 mandibles and 12 maxillae in 20 patients. After a follow-up of 12 to 36 months, survival rate was 97.1% for straight implants and 96.0% for tilted implants; while success rate were 94.3% and 94.0%, respectively. Both success and survival rates were not significantly different (P>0.05). A 0.5 ± 0.4 mm changes in crestal bone level was recorded for straight implants, while that of tilted implants was 0.6 ± 0.4 mm (P>0.05).Straight and tilted implants seem to have similar behavior after immediate loading rehabilitations. After functional loading, straight and tilted implants do not differ significantly as far as their clinical outcome is concerned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immediate loading, implant success, crestal bone level, tilted implants, mouth rehabilitation.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31536710     DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations.

Authors:  Michael Korsch; Winfried Walther; Matthias Hannig; Andreas Bartols
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-31

2.  Long-term follow-up of full-arch immediate implant-supported restorations in edentulous jaws: a clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Werbelow; Michael Weiss; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-07-30

3.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Maxillary Sinus Complications in Relation to Treatments with Strategic Implants® Penetrating Into the Sinus.

Authors:  Aleksandar Lazarov
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  Clinical Effect and Aesthetic Observation of All-on-4 Immediate Loading Implant Denture in Severe Periodontitis.

Authors:  Zhe Cheng; Wanlai Zheng
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible by All-on-Four Treatment Concept: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Up to 10 Years Follow-Up.

Authors:  Tommaso Grandi; Luca Signorini
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 6.  Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Ibrahim; Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.