Literature DB >> 31536620

A cross-sectional survey of the pharmacy workforce in general practice in Scotland.

Derek Stewart1, Katie Maclure1, Rosemary Newham2, Kathrine Gibson-Smith1, Rachel Bruce2,3, Scott Cunningham1, Andrew Maclure1, Sarah Fry4, James Mackerrow4, Marion Bennie2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Scotland, there has been significant investment in pharmacy teams in general medical practices over recent years, aligned to current government policy.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the national pharmacy workforce including activities undertaken, perceived competence and confidence, as well as perception of integration of the intervention.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of all pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in general practices. Survey items were demographics, activities undertaken and experiences. The NoMAD tool (Improving the Normalization of Complex Interventions) was included as a measure of perspectives of implementation. Post-piloting, a questionnaire link was sent to all pharmacists (n = 471) and pharmacy technicians (n = 112). A total NoMAD score was obtained by assigning 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to each item.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 393 (83.4%) pharmacists and 101 (91.8%) pharmacy technicians. Three quarters of pharmacists (74.6%) and pharmacy technicians (73.3%) had been qualified for over 10 years. Two-thirds of pharmacists (68.4%) were independent prescribers, with three quarters (72.3%) currently prescribing. Respondents worked in a median of two practices and were providing a range of activities including medication/polypharmacy reviews, medicines reconciliation, prescribing efficiencies and training. Respondents reported high levels of competence and confidence (median 8, scale 0-10 highest). Median NoMAD total score (scale 20-100 highest, Cronbach's alpha 0.89) was 80 for pharmacists and 75 for pharmacy technicians, P ≤ 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: The general practice pharmacy workforce in Scotland is experienced, well-qualified and integrated within general practices, delivering a range of activities. These findings have implications for workforce planning and future education and training.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Evaluation studies; Scotland; general practice; multimorbidity; pharmacy; surveys and questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31536620     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmz052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  6 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to implementation of non-medical independent prescribing in primary care in the UK: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Judith Edwards; Melaine Coward; Nicola Carey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Exploring learning needs for general practice based pharmacist: Are behavioural and influencing skills needed?

Authors:  Chris F Johnson; Jan Smith; Heather Harrison; Richard Hassett
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2020-05-04

3.  General practitioners' experiences with, views of, and attitudes towards, general practice-based pharmacists: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ameerah S Hasan Ibrahim; Heather E Barry; Carmel M Hughes
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  Implementation of pharmacist-led services in primary care: A mixed-methods exploration of pharmacists' perceptions of a national educational resource package.

Authors:  Kate Preston; Natalie M Weir; Tanja Mueller; Rosemary Newham; Marion Bennie
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2021-09-13

5.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacy personnel in primary care.

Authors:  Natalie Weir; Rosemary Newham; Emma Dunlop; Aimee Ferguson; Marion Bennie
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 1.792

6.  A theoretically informed, mixed-methods study of pharmacists' aspirations and readiness to implement pharmacist prescribing.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Abdulrouf Pallivalapila; Binny Thomas; Yolande Hanssens; Wessam El Kassem; Zachariah Nazar; Moza Al Hail
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-06-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.