| Literature DB >> 31536591 |
Kazutaka Sekine1, Daniel J Carter2.
Abstract
A range of demographic and socioeconomic factors are known to account for enormous disparities in the uptake of maternal health care in low- and middle-income countries. In contrast, contextual factors such as child marriage are far less explored as a deterrent to the uptake of maternal health care. The present study aimed to assess the total effect of child marriage on the utilization of maternal health services in Nepal. This study drew on data from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2016. The study restricted its analysis to a subsample of 3,970 currently married women of reproductive age who had at least one live birth in the five years preceding the survey. After descriptive analysis, logistic regression models were constructed to estimate adjusted odds ratios. The results of logistic regression controlling for confounders suggested child marriage decreased the likelihood of antenatal care visits (AOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.86), skilled attendance at delivery (AOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.56-0.78), facility-based delivery (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56-0.77), and postnatal care use (AOR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.96). The findings of this study reinforced the existing evidence for the adverse effect of child marriage on maternal health-seeking behaviors. Women's restricted access to household resources, limited autonomy in decision-making, social isolation, and the dominant power of husbands and mothers-in-law may play a role in the findings. Addressing women's social vulnerability as a barrier to accessing health care may help to increase the uptake of maternal health services.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31536591 PMCID: PMC6752778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Framework for confounder selection.
Control variables and their measurements.
| Control variable | Measurement scale |
|---|---|
| Age of the woman at interview | 15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, or ≥35 |
| Age of the husband at interview | 15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, or ≥35 |
| Religion | Hindu or non-Hindu |
| Ethnic group | Advantaged or disadvantaged |
| Ecological zone | Mountain, hill, or lowlands (also known as Terai) |
| Economic status of the household | Poor, middle income, or rich |
| Highest level of education that women have attained | No education, primary education, or secondary/higher education |
| Highest level of education that the husband has attained | No education, primary education, or secondary/higher education |
| Women’s job | No job/low skilled job or paid skilled jobs |
| Place of residence | Urban or rural |
| Exposure to mass media | ‘no exposure to radio or television,’ ‘exposure to either radio or television at least once a week,’ ‘exposure to both radio and television at least once a week’ |
Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of currently married Nepali women aged 15–49 who had a live birth in the past five years.
| Variable | Participants | P-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Child marriage (n = 2,138) | Adult marriage (n = 1,832) | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |||
| Age of women at interview | P<0.001 | |||||||
| 15–19 | 341 | 8.3 | 320 | 14.7 | 21 | 1.1 | ||
| 20–24 | 1,301 | 31.8 | 756 | 35.3 | 545 | 27.9 | ||
| 25–29 | 1,337 | 34.6 | 612 | 29.1 | 725 | 40.9 | ||
| 30–34 | 644 | 16.3 | 299 | 13.7 | 345 | 19.1 | ||
| ≥35 | 347 | 9.0 | 151 | 7.2 | 196 | 10.9 | ||
| Age of husbands at interview | P<0.001 | |||||||
| 15–19 | 49 | 1.1 | 31 | 1.4 | 18 | 0.8 | ||
| 20–24 | 676 | 15.5 | 438 | 18.9 | 238 | 11.6 | ||
| 25–29 | 1,210 | 30.3 | 643 | 31.0 | 567 | 29.4 | ||
| 30–34 | 1,092 | 28.3 | 547 | 26.0 | 545 | 30.9 | ||
| ≥35 | 943 | 24.9 | 479 | 22.8 | 464 | 27.3 | ||
| Religion | P = 0.857 | |||||||
| Hindu | 3,458 | 85.7 | 1,851 | 85.5 | 1,607 | 85.8 | ||
| Others | 512 | 14.3 | 287 | 14.5 | 225 | 14.2 | ||
| Ethnic group | P = 0.052 | |||||||
| Advantaged | 2,001 | 50.9 | 1,034 | 48.7 | 967 | 53.3 | ||
| Disadvantaged | 1,969 | 49.2 | 1,104 | 51.3 | 865 | 46.7 | ||
| Ecological zone | P<0.001 | |||||||
| Mountain | 323 | 6.7 | 177 | 6.7 | 146 | 6.7 | ||
| Hill | 1,724 | 40.2 | 859 | 33.3 | 865 | 48.0 | ||
| Lowland | 1,923 | 53.1 | 1,102 | 60.0 | 821 | 45.3 | ||
| Economic status | P<0.001 | |||||||
| Poor | 1,323 | 27.9 | 780 | 30.9 | 543 | 24.5 | ||
| Middle | 1,324 | 34.5 | 775 | 39.1 | 549 | 29.3 | ||
| Rich | 1,323 | 37.6 | 583 | 30.0 | 740 | 46.3 | ||
| Highest level of women's education | P<0.001 | |||||||
| No education | 1,218 | 31.5 | 802 | 39.5 | 416 | 22.3 | ||
| Primary | 755 | 19.4 | 497 | 24.6 | 258 | 13.5 | ||
| Secondary or higher | 1,997 | 49.2 | 839 | 35.9 | 1,158 | 64.2 | ||
| Highest level of husband's education | P<0.001 | |||||||
| No education | 504 | 13.7 | 364 | 19.0 | 140 | 7.6 | ||
| Primary | 840 | 21.4 | 542 | 26.4 | 298 | 15.7 | ||
| Secondary or higher | 2,621 | 64.9 | 1,229 | 54.5 | 1,392 | 76.7 | ||
| Women's job | P<0.001 | |||||||
| No job or low skilled job | 3,477 | 86.5 | 1,943 | 90.9 | 1,534 | 81.6 | ||
| Paid skilled jobs | 493.0 | 13.47 | 195 | 9.1 | 298 | 18.4 | ||
| Place of residence | P<0.001 | |||||||
| Urban | 2,314 | 55.5 | 1,157 | 48.5 | 1,157 | 63.5 | ||
| Rural | 1,656 | 44.5 | 981 | 51.5 | 675 | 36.5 | ||
| Exposure to mass media | P<0.001 | |||||||
| No exposure to radio or television | 2,740 | 69.7 | 1,620 | 77.0 | 1,120 | 61.3 | ||
| Exposure to either radio or television at least once a week | 757 | 18.3 | 327 | 13.6 | 430 | 23.5 | ||
| Exposure to both radio and television at least once a week | 473 | 12.1 | 191 | 9.4 | 282 | 15.2 | ||
% = weighted percentage Absolute number of participants does not perfectly correspond to percentages presented because weighted analyses were used. P-value is for the differentials of child marriage by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
Associations between child marriage and maternal care use among currently married Nepali women aged 15–49 years who had a live birth in the past five years (n = 3,970).
| Outcome variables | Overall | Child marriage | Adult marriage | OR (95% CI) | Model 1: Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Model 2: Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Model 3: Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (weighted %) | n (weighted %) | n (weighted %) | |||||||||
| Four or more antenatal care contacts | 0.53 | 0.74 | |||||||||
| Yes | 2,534 | (63.0) | 1,223 | (54.9) | 1,311 | (72.1) | |||||
| No | 1,436 | (37.0) | 915 | (45.1) | 521 | (27.9) | |||||
| Skilled attendance at delivery | 0.49 | 0.66 | |||||||||
| Yes | 2,421 | (61.0) | 1,141 | (51.8) | 1,280 | (71.4) | |||||
| No | 1,549 | (39.0) | 997 | (48.2) | 552 | (28.6) | |||||
| Facility-based delivery | 0.47 | 0.65 | |||||||||
| Yes | 2,310 | (57.5) | 1,066 | (47.4) | 1,244 | (69.0) | |||||
| No | 1,660 | (42.5) | 1,072 | (52.6) | 588 | (31.0) | |||||
| Postnatal care within 24 hours of childbirth | 0.52 | 0.80 | |||||||||
| Yes | 2,054 | (51.7) | 945 | (42.8) | 1,109 | (62.0) | |||||
| No | 1,916 | (48.3) | 1,193 | (57.3) | 723 | (38.0) | |||||
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval;
*** p<0.001;
** p<0.01;
* p<0.05
a Analysis adjusted for age of the woman and her husband, religion, ethnic group, ecological zone, economic status, the highest level of education attained by the woman and the husband, women’s job, place of residence, and exposure to mass media.
b Analysis adjusted for antenatal care visits in addition to all the variables adjusted in Model 1.
c Analysis adjusted for skilled attendance at delivery in addition to all the variables adjusted in Model 2.