| Literature DB >> 31536439 |
Navin Raju1, Wenjian Zhang2, Aniket Jadhav3, Andreas Ioannou1, Sridhar Eswaran, Robin Weltman4.
Abstract
When placing implants in the anterior mandible, it is important to avoid damaging the mandibular nerve and its terminal extensions. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence, length, and passage of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal, as well as the quantity of alveolar bone that is coronal to the canal, to help with implant placement in the anterior mandible. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 124 patients with 248 hemi-sections were evaluated. Anterior loop prevalence was determined using reconstructed panoramic and cross-sectional views; length was measured as the distance between the most mesial aspect of the mental foramen to the most mesial aspect of the anterior loop on cross-sectional views. The bucco-lingual position of the anterior loop inside the mandible, and the apico-coronal dimensions of the alveolar bone above it, were measured on cross-sectional views to determine the passage of the anterior loop and the bone available coronally, respectively. The effects of gender, age, side, and dentate status on the prevalence and length of the anterior loop were analyzed statistically. Prevalence of the anterior loop at the patient and hemi-section levels was 25% and 24%, respectively, and its median length was 1.63 mm (0.52-3.92 mm). The anterior loop was apical to the mental foramen and mostly located within the buccal or middle one-third of the alveolar ridge, with an average height of coronal alveolar bone of 17.12 mm. Gender, age, side, and dentate status did not affect anterior loop prevalence and length. In conclusion, owing to great variation, a case-by-case CBCT evaluation of the anterior loop is necessary before placing implants in the anterior mandible.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior loop; CBCT; Mandibular canal; implant; mental foramen
Year: 2019 PMID: 31536439 DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Implantol ISSN: 0160-6972 Impact factor: 1.779