Literature DB >> 31535267

The Impact of Vocational Interventions on Vocational Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Community Integration in Adults with Childhood Onset Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Zechen Ma1, Priya Dhir2, Laure Perrier3, Mark Bayley1, Sarah Munce4,5.   

Abstract

Purpose Despite the desire and ability to work, individuals with childhood onset disabilities are under-represented in employment. Vocational interventions alleviate some barriers to obtaining and maintaining employment for this population. The research question addressed is: What is the impact of vocational interventions on vocational outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and community integration (CI) in adults with childhood onset neurological disabilities including cerebral palsy (CP), spina bifida, and acquired brain injury (ABI)? Methods A literature search was conducted in multiple electronic databases. All experimental and observational studies with comparator group(s) were included. Two reviewers independently completed titles and abstracts screening, full text screening, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment. Results Seventeen studies were eligible for final inclusion including three randomized-controlled trials, four non-randomized studies, and ten observational studies. Sixteen of seventeen studies included only individuals with ABI, while one study included individuals with CP. Vocational interventions from experimental studies were mainly components of multi-faceted interventions. Most observational studies were from the United States Vocational Rehabilitation Service. Conclusions Vocational interventions may be effective in improving vocational outcomes, QoL, and CI for individuals with ABI. There is limited experimental evidence on interventions that specifically target employment. Observational data suggest that receiving job placement assistance, on-the-job training and supports, counselling/guidance, maintenance, and supported employment successfully predicted employment outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acquired brain injury; Cerebral palsy; Spina bifida; Systematic review; Vocational rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31535267     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-019-09854-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  46 in total

1.  A consensus statement on health care transitions for young adults with special health care needs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  A systematic review of research undertaken in vocational rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Joanna Sweetland; Eimi Howse; E Diane Playford
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 3.  Vocational rehabilitation services for people with hearing difficulties: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Arjenne H M Gussenhoven; Elise P Jansma; S Theo Goverts; Joost M Festen; Johannes R Anema; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Work       Date:  2013

Review 4.  A systematic review of vocational interventions for young adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Julie Lounds Taylor; Melissa L McPheeters; Nila A Sathe; Dwayne Dove; Jeremy Veenstra-Vanderweele; Zachary Warren
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Interventions to enhance work participation of workers with a chronic disease: a systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Marloes Vooijs; Monique C J Leensen; Jan L Hoving; Haije Wind; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  A medical/vocational case coordination system for persons with brain injury: an evaluation of employment outcomes.

Authors:  J F Malec; A L Buffington; A M Moessner; L Degiorgio
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Replication of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Resource Facilitation to Improve Return to Work and School After Brain Injury.

Authors:  Lance E Trexler; Devan R Parrott; James F Malec
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Carlos Cuello; Elie A Akl; Reem A Mustafa; Jörg J Meerpohl; Kris Thayer; Rebecca L Morgan; Gerald Gartlehner; Regina Kunz; S Vittal Katikireddi; Jonathan Sterne; Julian Pt Higgins; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.