| Literature DB >> 31534691 |
Kyle B Heine1, Matthew J Powers1, Christine Kallenberg1, Victoria L Tucker1, Wendy R Hood1.
Abstract
An important component of life history theory is understanding how natural variation arises in populations. Both endogenous and exogenous factors contribute to organism survival and reproduction, and therefore, it is important to understand how such factors are both beneficial and detrimental to population dynamics. One ecologically relevant factor that influences the life history of aquatic organisms is ultraviolet (UV) radiation. While the majority of research has focused on the potentially detrimental effects that UV radiation has on aquatic organisms, few studies have evaluated hormetic responses stimulated by radiation under select conditions. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of UV-A/B irradiation on life history characteristics in Tigriopus californicus copepods. After exposing copepods to UV-A/B irradiation (control, 1-, and 3-hr UV treatments at 0.5 W/m2), we measured the impact of exposure on fecundity, reproductive effort, and longevity. We found that UV irradiation increased the size of the first clutch among all reproducing females in both the 1- and 3-hr experimental groups and decreased longevity among all females that mated in the 1-hr treatment. UV irradiation had no effect on the number of clutches females produced. These findings indicate a potential benefit of UV irradiation on reproductive performance early in life, although the same exposure came at a cost to longevity.Entities:
Keywords: Tigriopus californicus; hormesis; life history; reproductive performance; stress
Year: 2019 PMID: 31534691 PMCID: PMC6745833 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Means, standard deviations, and sample sizes (n) of life history responses in copepods with respect to UV irradiation treatment
| Response |
| Control | 1‐hr UV | 3‐hr UV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of nauplii | 41 | 20.8 ± 14.6 | 29.5 ± 10.9 | 27.8 ± 12.7 |
| Gestation duration (days) | 43 | 4.3 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.9 |
| Number of clutches | 80 | 4.1 ± 5.3 | 3.2 ± 5.4 | 5.6 ± 6.6 |
| Longevity (days) | ||||
| Virgins | 64 | 61.3 ± 36.3 | 58.2 ± 40.1 | 57.1 ± 36.0 |
| Failed mating | 36 | 15.3 ± 16.2 | 8.5 ± 8.2 | 8.7 ± 5.9 |
| Produced clutches | 43 | 64.5 ± 34.1 | 54.4 ± 28.4 | 63.9 ± 27.5 |
Under the longevity response, virgins represent females that did not mate, failed mating represents females that mated but did not produce clutches (egg sacs), and produced clutches represents females that mated and produced clutches.
Results of GLMs predicting variation in the number of nauplii produced in the first clutch and the total number of clutches produced per female copepod
| Response | Predictor |
| Est./ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of naupliiA | |||
| 1‐hr UV | 11 | 0.24/0.08 | |
| 3‐hr UV | 15 | 0.20/0.07 | |
| Gestation duration | 41 | −0.13/0.03 | |
| Gestation duration (days)B | |||
| 1‐hr UV | 11 | −0.16/0.09 | |
| 3‐hr UV | 16 | −0.13/0.08 | |
| Number of clutchesC | |||
|
1
| 1‐hr UV | 25 | 0.07/0.34 |
| 3‐hr UV | 28 | 0.39/0.31 | |
|
2
| 1‐hr UV | 25 | 0.69/0.62 |
| 3‐hr UV | 28 | 0.18/0.60 | |
| Longevity (days)D | |||
| 1‐hr UV |
|
| |
| 3‐hr UV |
|
| |
| Virgin | 64 | 37.75/6.51 | |
| Produced clutches | 43 | 37.72/7.26 | |
| Age | 143 | −12.68/3.09 | |
| Longevity (days)E | |||
| 1‐hr UV | 25 | −0.93/0.40 | |
| 3‐hr UV | 27 | −0.71/0.41 | |
| Number of clutches | 79 | 0.34/0.03 | |
| Age | 79 | −0.80/0.21 |
Mean estimates of gestation duration (appearance of an egg sac to hatching) and longevity are presented from LMs. n is sample size, Est. is the point estimate, and SE is the standard error of the estimate. Mean estimates for 1‐ and 3‐hr UV irradiation treatments are estimated in comparison to controls. Longevity was modeled using two methods: one model with reproductive status (virgin, failed mating, and produced clutches) as a covariate and one model with the number of clutches that mating females produced as a covariate. Virgins and females that produced clutches are in comparison to females that mated but did not produce clutches (failed mating). Significance levels:
0.1
0.05
0.01
0.001
not retained
Figure 1Boxplots showing effects of UV irradiation treatments on fecundity in female copepods, as indicated by (a) the number of nauplii produced in the first clutch with gestation duration as a covariate and (b) first‐clutch gestation duration. The effects of UV irradiation on reproductive effort are indicated by (c) the number of clutches (eggs sacs) produced per female, and additionally, the impact of treatment on (d) longevity with the number of clutches and age as covariates. Large dots represent mean estimates, and n is sample size. Significance codes: ns—not significant, #0.1, *0.05, **0.01, and ***0.001
Figure 2Scatterplots and boxplot indicating (a) the relationship between the number of nauplii produced in the first clutch and gestation duration with UV irradiation as a covariate, (b) the relationship between longevity and reproduction of virgin female copepods and females that mated and did or did not (failed mating) produce clutches with age as a covariate, (c) the relationship between longevity and age with reproduction as a covariate, and (d) the relationship between longevity and the number of clutches with age and UV irradiation as covariates. Large dots represent mean estimates, and n is sample size. Gray shading in scatterplots denotes 95% confidence intervals. Significance codes: ns—not significant, #0.1, *0.05, **0.01, and ***0.001