| Literature DB >> 31534214 |
Mary N Sheppard1,2, Connie R Bezzina3, Elijah R Behr4,5, Najim Lahrouchi3, Hariharan Raju1,2, Elisabeth M Lodder3, Stathis Papatheodorou1,2, Chris Miles1,2, James S Ware6,7, Michael Papadakis1,2, Rafik Tadros3,8, Della Cole1,2, Jonathan R Skinner9,10, Jackie Crawford9, Donald R Love9, Chee J Pua11, Bee Y Soh11, Jaydutt D Bhalshankar11, Risha Govind6,7, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen12, Bo G Winkel12, Christian van der Werf3, Yanushi D Wijeyeratne1,2, Greg Mellor1,2, Janice Till2,6,7, Marta Cohen13, Maria Tome-Esteban1,2, Sanjay Sharma1,2, Arthur A M Wilde3, Stuart A Cook6,11,14.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is often associated with structural abnormalities of the heart during autopsy. This study sought to compare the diagnostic yield of postmortem genetic testing in (1) cases with structural findings of uncertain significance at autopsy to (2) cases with autopsy findings diagnostic of cardiomyopathy. We evaluated 57 SCD cases with structural findings at cardiac autopsy. Next-generation sequencing using a panel of 77 primary electrical disorder and cardiomyopathy genes was performed. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were classified using American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) consensus guidelines. In 29 cases (51%) autopsy findings of uncertain significance were identified whereas in 28 cases (49%) a diagnosis of cardiomyopathy was established. We identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in 10 cases (18%); in 1 (3%) case with non-specific autopsy findings compared with 9 (32%) cases with autopsy findings diagnostic of cardiomyopathy (p = 0.0054). The yield of genetic testing in SCD cases with autopsy findings consistent with cardiomyopathy is comparable with the yield in cardiomyopathy patients that are alive. Genetic testing in cases with findings of uncertain significance offers lower clinical utility than in cardiomyopathy, with lower yields than detected previously. This highlights the need for stringent evaluation of variant pathogenicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31534214 PMCID: PMC6906523 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0500-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet ISSN: 1018-4813 Impact factor: 4.246