Literature DB >> 31533927

Clinical and in vivo confocal microscopic features of neuropathic corneal pain.

Andrew R Ross1, Mouhamed Ali Al-Aqaba1, Amna Almaazmi1, Marco Messina1, Mario Nubile2, Leonardo Mastropasqua2, Harminder S Dua3, Dalia G Said1,4.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe clinical and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) features of neuropathic corneal pain (NCP) without clinically visible signs.
METHODS: Prospective, observational study of 27 eyes of 14 patients who had continuous severe ocular pain for one or more years, with minimal or no ocular surface signs and were non-responsive to topical lubricants, steroids and/or ciclosporin. All patients were evaluated using Ocular Surface Disease Index, Oxford grading scale, Schirmer test 1, Cochet Bonnet esthesiometry and response to topical anaesthesia. Central and paracentral regions of the cornea of patients and seven healthy controls were studied by IVCM. Corneal epithelial thickness and sub-basal nerve density were measured in patients and controls.
RESULTS: Four patients responded to topical anaesthesia (responsive group (RG)), indicating peripheral NCP while 10 patients did not show any improvement (non-responsive group (NRG)), indicating central NCP. Schirmer-1 test was within normal limits in the RG but significantly greater in the NRG (p<0.001). None of the other clinical parameters nor corneal epithelial thickness were statistically significantly different. The sub-basal nerve density was significantly reduced (p<0.008) in patients compared with controls. Stroma of all patients demonstrated activated keratocytes and spindle, lateral and stump microneuromas. There was a statistically significant greater number of microneuromas (p<0.0001) and activated keratocytes in RG compared with NRG.
CONCLUSION: NCP without visible clinical signs does not represent typical dry eye disease. Distinct signs demonstrated on IVCM suggest that peripheral NCP, which responds to topical anaesthesia, and central NCP, which does not, are separate entities. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cornea; diagnostic tests/investigation; imaging; ocular surface

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31533927     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  7 in total

1.  Corneal Confocal Microscopy Features and Tear Molecular Profile in Study Participants with Discordance between Ocular Surface Disease Clinical Signs and Discomfort.

Authors:  Sharon D'Souza; Rohit Shetty; Archana Padmanabhan Nair; Ruchika Agrawal; Mor M Dickman; Pooja Khamar; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Arkasubhra Ghosh; Swaminathan Sethu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Identification of presumed corneal neuromas and microneuromas using laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Holly Rose Chinnery; Rajni Rajan; Haihan Jiao; Mengliang Wu; Alexis Ceecee Zhang; Manikkuwadura Eranda Harshan De Silva; Eve Makrai; Mary Ann Stepp; Nick Di Girolamo; Laura Elizabeth Downie
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.908

3.  Corneal sub-basal nerve plexus microneuromas in individuals with and without dry eye.

Authors:  Harrison Dermer; Jodi Hwang; Rhiya Mittal; Adam K Cohen; Anat Galor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 5.908

Review 4.  Impact of Attrition, Intercellular Shear in Dry Eye Disease: When Cells are Challenged and Neurons are Triggered.

Authors:  Gysbert-Botho van Setten
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Could contact lens dryness discomfort symptoms sometimes have a neuropathic basis?

Authors:  Charles W McMonnies
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2021-04-06

Review 6.  Modern approach to the treatment of dry eye, a complex multifactorial disease: a P.I.C.A.S.S.O. board review.

Authors:  Pasquale Aragona; Giuseppe Giannaccare; Rita Mencucci; Pierangela Rubino; Emilia Cantera; Maurizio Rolando
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Clinical characteristics of dry eye with ocular neuropathic pain features: comparison according to the types of sensitization based on the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey.

Authors:  Jonghwa Kim; Hyeon Jeong Yoon; In Cheon You; Byung Yi Ko; Kyung Chul Yoon
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.