Literature DB >> 31533848

How I wean patients from veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation.

Francesco Vasques1, Federica Romitti2, Luciano Gattinoni2, Luigi Camporota3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31533848      PMCID: PMC6749626          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2592-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Identifying patients who are ready for weaning and liberation from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is challenging in clinical practice. Compared to the several trials addressing the safety and efficacy of ECMO in severe ARDS [1-4], the body of literature regarding ECMO weaning is remarkably scarce. Therefore, this essential component of the management of patients on ECMO is highly variable and often lacks of a systematic approach [5], analogously to the weaning protocols and spontaneous breathing trials used for liberation from mechanical ventilation [6]. The trajectory from ECMO cannulation to lung recovery and ECMO decannulation consists in the transition from a phase in which ECMO is essential to meet the patient’s metabolic needs (i.e. metabolic oxygen consumption and CO2 production) to a phase in which the native lung function has recovered to satisfy completely the metabolic demands, even if with a degree of ventilatory support considered “safe”. In between these two phases is a continuum of lung healing, during which lung function becomes sufficient to maintain a gas exchange compatible with life, but at the expenses of a high respiratory drive and large swings in transpulmonary pressures. In these conditions, ECMO has the role of maintaining lung protection partially contributing to the patient’s gas exchange [5]. In the effort to track the progress of an individual patient along this imaginary line, it is necessary to measure the relative contribution of the membrane and native lungs in terms of gas exchange, as well as the response of the patient’s respiratory drive and mechanics to the variation in ECMO settings. We propose a physiology-based assessment protocol, which combines an objective assessment of the native and artificial lung function and quantifies the patient’s response to a standardised weaning trial.

Patients’ selection

The prerequisites for a weaning assessment is that patients are comfortable, haemodynamically stable and on spontaneous or assisted mechanical ventilation (e.g. CPAP/PS). In addition, the PaO2 after a 100% test (i.e. the systemic arterial PaO2 taken after 15 min of FiO2 = 1.0 on the mechanical ventilator) > 30 kPa (225 mmHg) and a P0.1 < 5 cmH2O.

Baseline measurements

On a daily assessment of ECMO patients, we routinely measure the following: Gas exchange variables, including the 100% test; post-membrane PO2, VO2 and VCO2 of the membrane lung (VCO2ML) and VO2ML; and VCO2 of the natural lung (VCO2NL) using volumetric capnometry. This allows calculating the total VCO2 (VCO2tot = VCO2ML + VCO2NL) and the proportion of VCO2tot eliminated by the natural lung (VCO2NL/VCO2tot). Ventilatory variables, including the negative inspiratory force (NIF), the P0.1 (as estimate of the inspiratory drive) and the ratio of P0.1/NIF, and swings in oesophageal pressure (if available). In our protocol (see Additional file 1 and Fig. 1), we assess separately the patient’s dependence on ECMO—in terms of both oxygenation and decarboxylation, or decarboxylation alone—by conducting two sequential steps. The first step consists in the progressive reduction of the ECMO FdO2 (fraction of oxygen in the sweep gas flow), while the second entails the stepwise reduction of the SGF. The ECBF remains unchanged throughout the procedure.
Fig. 1

ECMO weaning test. FdO2 = fraction on oxygen in the sweep gas; EDCT = ECMO de-oxy challenge test; ECCT = ECMO CO2 challenge test; OCT = oxygen challenge test (FiO2 100% on the ventilator); VCO2NL = VCO2 natural lung; VCO2ML = VCO2 membrane lung; SGF = sweep gas flow

ECMO weaning test. FdO2 = fraction on oxygen in the sweep gas; EDCT = ECMO de-oxy challenge test; ECCT = ECMO CO2 challenge test; OCT = oxygen challenge test (FiO2 100% on the ventilator); VCO2NL = VCO2 natural lung; VCO2ML = VCO2 membrane lung; SGF = sweep gas flow

Step 1: ECMO Deoxy Challenge Test (EDCT)

Before commencing the assessment, the FiO2 on the ventilator is increased to 60% in order to prevent the transient hypoxaemia that may happen during ECMO weaning. This frequently observed hypoxaemia is partly explained by the abolition of hypoxic vasoconstriction during ECMO support (due to elevated SvO2). The reduction of ECMO VO2 will reduce the SvO2, which will allow the return of the physiologic hypoxic vasoconstriction. This pulmonary vascular response, however, takes time (minutes), and the slow adaptation can lead to a transiently worsened functional shunt (venous admixture). The role of the EDCT is allow time to restore the physiological hypoxic vasoconstriction and optimise ventilation perfusion matching (V/Q). If V/Q is not restored, the functional dead space due to shunt increases and the ability of the natural lung to eliminate CO2 can be impaired. FdO2 is decreased from 100 to 60%, 30% and 21% in 5-min steps. A peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) > 88% and P0.1 < 10 cmH2O will need to be maintained throughout the test. If a patient meets stopping criteria, the test is suspended and the patient is declared “ECMO-dependent”. If EDCT is successful, FdO2 can be kept at 21% and the test can proceed to step 2 (Fig. 1).

Step 2: ECMO CO2 Challenge Test (ECCT)

During this phase of the weaning trial, the SGF is reduced by 30% every 5–10 min, while measuring the patient’s response (see Additional file 1 and Fig. 1). Weaning failure and test interruption are indicated by SpO2 < 88%, RR > 35 bpm and P0.1 > 10 cmH2O; VCO2NL/VE fall by 20% from baseline; and the negative swings of oesophageal pressure are < 15 cmH2O, or if any signs of distress/instability are evident (Fig. 1). If the patient’s response remains within set limits at 0 SGF, the weaning test is successful, and the clinical team will consider whether to remain off ECMO or reintroduce a variable degree of extracorporeal support pending decannulation. We believe that a standardised approach to ECMO assessment and weaning is essential to identify patients who are no longer ECMO dependent. In addition, it provides clinicians with a reproducible protocol to ECMO liberation and researchers with a tool to compare duration on ECMO in clinical trials where ECMO duration is an outcome measure. Weaning protocol. (DOCX 56 kb)
  6 in total

1.  An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults. Rehabilitation Protocols, Ventilator Liberation Protocols, and Cuff Leak Tests.

Authors:  Timothy D Girard; Waleed Alhazzani; John P Kress; Daniel R Ouellette; Gregory A Schmidt; Jonathon D Truwit; Suzanne M Burns; Scott K Epstein; Andres Esteban; Eddy Fan; Miguel Ferrer; Gilles L Fraser; Michelle Ng Gong; Catherine L Hough; Sangeeta Mehta; Rahul Nanchal; Sheena Patel; Amy J Pawlik; William D Schweickert; Curtis N Sessler; Thomas Strøm; Kevin C Wilson; Peter E Morris
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  ECMO for ARDS: from salvage to standard of care?

Authors:  Darryl Abrams; Niall D Ferguson; Laurent Brochard; Eddy Fan; Alain Mercat; Alain Combes; Vin Pellegrino; Matthieu Schmidt; Arthur S Slutsky; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 30.700

3.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Alain Combes; David Hajage; Gilles Capellier; Alexandre Demoule; Sylvain Lavoué; Christophe Guervilly; Daniel Da Silva; Lara Zafrani; Patrice Tirot; Benoit Veber; Eric Maury; Bruno Levy; Yves Cohen; Christian Richard; Pierre Kalfon; Lila Bouadma; Hossein Mehdaoui; Gaëtan Beduneau; Guillaume Lebreton; Laurent Brochard; Niall D Ferguson; Eddy Fan; Arthur S Slutsky; Daniel Brodie; Alain Mercat
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Giles J Peek; Miranda Mugford; Ravindranath Tiruvoipati; Andrew Wilson; Elizabeth Allen; Mariamma M Thalanany; Clare L Hibbert; Ann Truesdale; Felicity Clemens; Nicola Cooper; Richard K Firmin; Diana Elbourne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Posterior Probability of Mortality Benefit in a Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ewan C Goligher; George Tomlinson; David Hajage; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Eddy Fan; Peter Jüni; Daniel Brodie; Arthur S Slutsky; Alain Combes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Extracorporeal gas exchange: when to start and how to end?

Authors:  L Gattinoni; F Vassalli; F Romitti; F Vasques; I Pasticci; E Duscio; M Quintel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Extracorporeal Life Support Organization COVID-19 Interim Guidelines.

Authors:  Kiran Shekar; Jenelle Badulak; Giles Peek; Udo Boeken; Heidi J Dalton; Lovkesh Arora; Bishoy Zakhary; Kollengode Ramanathan; Joanne Starr; Bindu Akkanti; M Velia Antonini; Mark T Ogino; Lakshmi Raman
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Prognostic Significance of Arterial Lactate Levels at Weaning from Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Antonio Fiore; Kristján Jónsson; Giuseppe Gatti; Svante Zipfel; Vito G Ruggieri; Andrea Perrotti; Karl Bounader; Antonio Loforte; Andrea Lechiancole; Diyar Saeed; Artur Lichtenberg; Marek Pol; Cristiano Spadaccio; Matteo Pettinari; Krister Mogianos; Khalid Alkhamees; Giovanni Mariscalco; Zein El Dean; Nicla Settembre; Henryk Welp; Angelo M Dell'Aquila; Thomas Fux; Tatu Juvonen; Magnus Dalén
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in coronavirus disease 2019: a case series.

Authors:  Joe Zhang; Blair Merrick; Genex L Correa; Luigi Camporota; Andrew Retter; Andrew Doyle; Guy W Glover; Peter B Sherren; Stephen J Tricklebank; Sangita Agarwal; Boris E Lams; Nicholas A Barrett; Nicholas Ioannou; Jonathan Edgeworth; Christopher I S Meadows
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-10-26

4.  Mechanical Power during Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Initiation: A Pilot-Study.

Authors:  Mirko Belliato; Francesco Epis; Luca Cremascoli; Fiorenza Ferrari; Maria Giovanna Quattrone; Christoph Fisser; Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Matteo Di Nardo; Lars Mikael Broman; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-02

Review 5.  Physiological Basis of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Barbara Ficial; Francesco Vasques; Joe Zhang; Stephen Whebell; Michael Slattery; Tomas Lamas; Kathleen Daly; Nicola Agnew; Luigi Camporota
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 6.  Protocol-driven daily optimisation of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flows: an alternate paradigm?

Authors:  Kiran Shekar; Hergen Buscher; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Association of Respiratory Parameters at Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Liberation With Duration of Mechanical Ventilation and ICU Length of Stay: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sonny Thiara; Ary Serpa Neto; Aidan J C Burrell; Bentley J Fulcher; Carol L Hodgson
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-05-02

8.  Safety and Feasibility of a Protocolized Daily Assessment of Readiness for Liberation From Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Whitney D Gannon; John W Stokes; Sarah Bloom; Wren Sherrill; Matthew Bacchetta; Todd W Rice; Matthew W Semler; Jonathan D Casey
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Coronavirus Disease 2019 Interim Guidelines: A Consensus Document from an International Group of Interdisciplinary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Providers.

Authors:  Kiran Shekar; Jenelle Badulak; Giles Peek; Udo Boeken; Heidi J Dalton; Lovkesh Arora; Bishoy Zakhary; Kollengode Ramanathan; Joanne Starr; Bindu Akkanti; M Velia Antonini; Mark T Ogino; Lakshmi Raman; Nicholas Barret; Daniel Brodie; Alain Combes; Roberto Lorusso; Graeme MacLaren; Thomas Müller; Matthew Paden; Vincent Pellegrino
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.826

Review 10.  Planning and provision of ECMO services for severe ARDS during the COVID-19 pandemic and other outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.

Authors:  Kollengode Ramanathan; David Antognini; Alain Combes; Matthew Paden; Bishoy Zakhary; Mark Ogino; Graeme MacLaren; Daniel Brodie; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.