| Literature DB >> 31533633 |
Chong Wang1, Renchi Fang1, Beibei Zhou1, Xuebin Tian2, Xiucai Zhang1, Xiangkuo Zheng2, Siqin Zhang1, Guofeng Dong2, Jianming Cao3, Tieli Zhou4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the evolutionary pathways of rifampicin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, and the impact of resistance mutations in the rpoB gene on fitness.Entities:
Keywords: Drug resistance evolution; Fitness cost; Rifampicin resistance; Staphylococcus aureus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31533633 PMCID: PMC6751903 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1573-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
MICs of the antibiotics tested in the current study
| Strains | MIC (mg / L) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIF | VAN | TEC | GEN | LNZ | TCY | ERY | CIP | OXA | CLI | CZO | |
| SA247 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| SA247R | 128 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| SA252 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 |
| SA252R | 128 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 |
| SA1370 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 | 64 | 4 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.25 |
| SA1370R | 128 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 | 64 | 4 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.25 |
| ATCC 25923 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| ATCC25923R | 128 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
MICs minimum inhibitory concentrations; RIF rifampicin; VAN vancomycin; TEC teicoplanin; GEN gentamicin; LNZ linezolid; TCY tetracycline; ERY erythromycin; CIP ciprofloxacin; OXA oxacillin; CLI clindamycin; CZO cefazolin
MIC and mutation of each generation of strains
| Strains | Generations | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0th | 1th | 2th | 3th | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | ||
| SA247R | MIC | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 32 | 128 |
| Mutation | – | – | – | H481L | H481L | H481L | H481L | H481F | H481F | |
| SA252R | MIC | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 64 | 128 |
| Mutation | – | – | – | – | – | – | H481Y | H481Y | H481Y | |
| SA1370R | MIC | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 128 |
| Mutation | – | – | – | – | – | – | S464P | H481Y/S464P | H481Y/S464P | |
| ATCC 25923R | MIC | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 |
| Mutation | – | – | – | R484H | S464P | S464P | S464P | H481Y/S464P | H481Y/S464P | |
MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, mg/L; H Histidine; L Leucine; F Phenylalanine; Y Tyrosine; S Serine; P Proline; R Arginine
Fig. 1Bacterial growth curves for all strains derived in this study. (a) Growth curves for SA247 (original strain) and SA247R (8th generation strain); (b) growth curves for SA252 and SA252R; (c) growth curves for SA1370 and SA1370R; (d) growth curves for ATCC 25923 and ATCC 25923R
Fig. 2The biofilm formation ability of all strains derived in this study
Fig. 3In vitro competition index (CI) results of all strains derived in study
Fig. 4Infection model of Galleria mellonella larvae. (a) Survival curves of Galleria mellonella larvae infected with S247 and S247R; (b) Survival curves of Galleria mellonella larvae infected with S252 and S252R; (c) Survival curves of Galleria mellonella larvae infected with S1370 and S1370R; (d) Survival curves of Galleria mellonella larvae infected with ATCC 25923 and ATCC 25923R