Literature DB >> 31533554

Abortion and contraceptive use stigma: a cross-sectional study of attitudes and beliefs in secondary school students in western Kenya.

Ulrika Rehnström Loi1, Beatrice Otieno2, Monica Oguttu3, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson4, Marie Klingberg-Allvin5, Elisabeth Faxelid6, Marlene Makenzius7.   

Abstract

Social stigma related to women's reproductive decision-making negatively impacts the health of women. However, little is known about stigmatising attitudes and beliefs surrounding abortion and contraceptive use among adolescents. The aim of this study was to measure stigmatising attitudes and beliefs regarding abortion and contraceptive use among secondary school students in western Kenya. A self-reported classroom questionnaire-survey was administered in February 2017 to students at two suburban secondary schools in western Kenya. Two scales were used to measure the stigma surrounding abortion and contraceptive use - the Adolescent Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions (ASABA) scale and the Contraceptive Use Stigma (CUS) scale. 1,369 students were eligible for the study; 1,207 (females = 618, males = 582) aged 13-21 years were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's χ2 test, and the t-test were used to analyse the data. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The students reported stigma associated with abortion (53.2%), and contraceptive use (54.4%). A larger proportion of male students reported abortion stigma (57.7%) and contraceptive use stigma (58.5%), compared to female students (49.0%, p = .003 and 50.6%, p = .007, respectively). Higher scores were displayed by younger rather than older age groups. No associations were identified between sexual debut and abortion stigma (p = .899) or contraceptive use stigma (p = .823). Abortion and contraceptive use are stigmatised by students in Kenya. The results can be used to combat abortion stigma and to increase contraceptive use among adolescents in Kenya.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kenya; adolescents; contraception; induced abortion; stigma; termination of pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31533554      PMCID: PMC7887988          DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1652028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 2641-0397


Introduction

Adolescent pregnancy and young motherhood are major public health concerns in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).[1] The majority of these pregnancies are unintended (unwanted or mistimed), and are more likely to happen among poor and uneducated girls.[2] Adolescent pregnancy is a major contributor to adverse health outcomes for the young woman and child.[3] In Kenya, adolescents (15–19 years) constitute 24% of the population.[4] In 2014 it was estimated that about 15% of women aged 20–49 years had their first sexual experience by the age of 15 years, and 50% had their first sexual experience by the age of 18 years.[4] Contraceptive use among adolescents in Kenya is relatively low; only 37% of sexually active adolescent females are using a modern contraceptive method. About 23% of Kenyan adolescent girls have an unmet need for contraception, compared to the national average of 18% among all women of reproductive age.[4] Adolescent pregnancy in Kenya remains at 18%, with an adolescent fertility rate of 96 per 1,000 women,[4] relatively high in comparison with the global fertility rate of 44.6 per 1,000 women aged 15–19.[5] Until 2010, the abortion law in Kenya was restrictive, with permission to terminate a pregnancy given only to save a woman’s life. A revised constitution has since been adopted, and abortion is now allowed when the life or health of the woman is in danger.[6] However, uncertainty remains about the reading of the law, and unsafe abortion is still a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in Kenya.[7] It is estimated that 75% of the 464,000 abortions in 2012 were conducted in an unsafe manner.[8] Timely and age-appropriate comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is a key method for helping adolescents avoid negative health outcomes and achieve sexual health.[9] The Kenyan government supports CSE; however, the education sector policies mostly promote an abstinence-only approach. Teachers are poorly equipped to provide CSE. Students are taught that sex is immoral and dangerous for young people.[10] Abortion stigma is the negative labelling of and discrimination against individuals associated with abortion.[11] Abortion stigma is found at all levels of society and exists worldwide. It inhibits women from accessing safe abortion services.[12] To prevent abortion stigma, women tend not to disclose their abortion behaviour[13] and seek clandestine abortions, which may be unsafe.[11] Abortion stigma is believed to exist partly because abortion separates reproduction from female sexuality, destroying traditional ideals of womanhood.[11,14] Contraceptive use stigma refers to the excessive disapproval of contraceptive use. Women or adolescent girls who use contraceptives or carry condoms are sometimes negatively labelled as promiscuous, or as prostitutes.[15,16] Young, unmarried women are particularly affected by contraceptive use stigma due to social pressure, gender norms and religious beliefs regarding premarital sex.[16,17] In Kenya, religious beliefs and sociocultural norms continue to contribute to condemnation of premarital pregnancy and contraceptive use[17] and abortion stigmatisation. Adolescent girls and young, unmarried women are particularly affected by the stigma surrounding abortion and contraceptive use.[17] Social stigma surrounding adolescent pregnancy and the absence of support from the male partner once an adolescent girl becomes pregnant are other alarming circumstances.[13,18] Research surrounding abortion stigma is growing. However, most studies focus on women with unwanted pregnancies who have had an abortion.[11] Little is known about secondary school students’ attitudes and beliefs regarding abortion and contraceptive use. Improving understanding of how stigmatisation of women’s reproductive decision-making operates and how this stigma is influenced by social norms can inform strategies to reduce such stigma. Reduced judgemental attitudes in society may remove barriers and improve access to high-quality comprehensive sexual and reproductive health information, education and services. The aim of this study was to measure stigmatising attitudes and beliefs regarding abortion and contraceptive use among secondary school students in western Kenya.

Methods

Study design and eligibility

A cross-sectional study design was used. A self-reported classroom questionnaire-survey of both female and male students at two suburban public secondary schools in Kisumu, western Kenya, was conducted in February 2017. The data was collected as the baseline of a cluster-randomised control trial (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03065842) to evaluate the effectiveness of a sexuality education programme in secondary schools, with the aim of reducing stigmatising attitudes towards women and adolescent girls related to abortion and contraceptive use. The inclusion criteria comprised all female and male students studying at the two selected secondary schools who were present on the day of data collection. Participants provided oral and written informed consent. As the study population was adolescents, participants under the age of 18 were required to have a signed assent and the tutor’s consent in order to participate. The informed consent document was translated into the Kiswahili language and then back to English to provide a clear understanding for all participants as well as an accurate translation. This study was approved by the Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital Ethical Review Committee (reference ERC.1B/VOL.I/263) and The Kenyan National Commission for Science Technology and Innovation.

Setting

The study was conducted in a low-income area of the Kisumu East and Kisumu Central sub-counties, western Kenya. Kisumu city is the capital city in Kisumu County, with an estimated population of 500,000. About 44% of the population in Kisumu County are between 0 and 14 years old.[19] Kisumu County has a high proportion of primary school enrolment (95%); however, only 61% transition to secondary school.[20] Two local secondary schools were selected based on a cluster-randomised procedure. Inclusion criteria were public suburban secondary schools with a minimum of 400 students (mixed gender) in Kisumu. One intervention school and one control school were drawn from a regional sample frame of four schools. Both schools were gender-mixed public day schools. Christian Religious Education (CRE) in secondary schools in Kenya occupies a key position in the curriculum. The CRE syllabus has many biblical topics and concepts.

Data collection

Data was collected in February 2017 by trained research assistants who also administered the closed classroom questionnaires. As this was the point zero measure for the baseline of a larger intervention study, no specific information regarding abortion or contraception was provided to the school students by the researchers. Although potential misunderstanding about these terms is possible in this group of students, our assumption was that they had some knowledge and understanding of abortion and contraceptive use as the standard curriculum includes education on sexuality. The research assistants were available in the classroom and responded to basic questions regarding the questionnaire. The questionnaires were administered in English, as it was the primary language of the two schools and all research assistants were fluent in English. Due to the sensitivity of the questionnaire, the participants’ responses were recorded without names.

Measures and outcomes

Since all the students came from a low-income area, for the purposes of this study, their families were considered to be in a low socioeconomic position. Age and gender were reported, and age was further broken down into three groups: 16–17 years, the average group (n = 590); 13–15 years, the younger group (n = 274); and 18–21 years, the older group (n = 328). These categories were developed based on the education system, syllabus and social aspects regarding abortion and contraceptive use in Kenya, but also to reveal comparable groups for statistical analysis. Two closed-ended questions regarding sexual behaviour were included: “Have you had your sexual debut (intercourse)?” and “Did you use any contraceptive method during your last intercourse?”. The Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions (SABA) is an 18-item scale developed in 2013 by Ipas and is a validated tool used to measure abortion stigma.[16,21] Three important dimensions of stigma can be captured by the SABA scale: (1) negative stereotypes associated with abortion (8 items), (2) discrimination/exclusion of women who choose to end their pregnancies (7 items) and (3) fear of contamination as a result of contact with a woman who underwent an abortion (3 items). A higher score on the SABA scale represents higher stigmatising attitudes and beliefs towards abortion. Based on previous research within this project, the SABA scale was modified to create an Adolescent Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs and Actions (ASABA) scale.[21] All items were adapted for an adolescent perspective and the word woman was replaced with girl.[21] Using a similar framework, a Contraceptive Use Stigma (CUS) 7-item scale was developed to measure stigmatising attitudes among secondary school students toward girls associated with contraceptive use.[21] Responses to the ASABA and CUS scales were given on a five-point Likert scale and ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree. (5) Thus, each respondent had a summed response score ranging from a minimum of 18 to a maximum of 90 (ASABA scale) and a minimum of 7 to a maximum of 35 (CUS scale). A higher score signified more agreement with the statement and consequently higher levels of stigma towards abortion and contraceptive use.

Study size

A total of 1,368 secondary school students were eligible for the study. Among them, two declined to participate in the study, one from each school, and 159 students were not present on the day the study was conducted (illness or unpaid school fee). The sample size of about 1,200 was arbitrarily derived since the schools were cluster randomised. However, for the initial validation of the scales (manuscript in press) the sample size (n = 300) was based on the principle of a minimum of ten respondents (5/gender) per scale item, and with a drop-out rate of 20%.[21]

Statistical analysis

The scale responses (ASABA and CUS) were categorised into 1–2 (do not agree), 3 (unsure) and 4–5 (agree). Summed scores were calculated. For further analysis, the summed score of the ASABA scale was categorised as either high (summed score ≥46) or low (summed score <46), and the summed score of the CUS scale was categorised as either high (summed score ≥19), or low (summed score <19). The cut-off points were determined based on the population distribution (median). Descriptive statistics were used to describe stigma scores, and a Pearson’s χ2 test was used to test the differences between sexes and age groups. An independent sample t-test was used to compare means. The significance level was set at p < .05. A binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent factors (gender and age) associated with the dependent variable, high level of stigmatising attitudes on abortion and contraceptive use combined. The sample of this study is a homogenous group of secondary school students from a low resource setting in western Kenya. In this setting, the research topic was sensitive and therefore, the questionnaire only included gender and age to protect respondents’ confidentiality. The cut-off point was determined based on the median (65), calculated on the total score for both the ASABA scale and the CUS. A summed score of ≥65 was set as high level of abortion and contraceptive use stigma, low level of stigma was a summed score <65. The associations were presented as odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The first and the last authors reported the preliminary results to the entire research team and shared the full data set. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.

Results

Description of participants

The sample analysed was 1,207 of the 1,368 eligible students, or 88%. The 1,207 secondary school students were 13–21 years in age, with a mean age of 16.66 years (SD 1.5). The mean age for females was 16.48 (SD 1.45) and the mean age for males was 18.84 (1.56; p < .001). About 16% had initiated sexual intercourse, and out of those, 82.6% declared that they had used a contraceptive method during their last intercourse. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the respondents by gender.
Table 1.

Characteristics of respondents by gender

CharacteristicFemaleMaleTotalP-valuec
n(%)N(%)n(%)
Age (13–21)618(51.2)582(48.2)1200(99.4) 
 13–15151(24.6)122(21.2)273(23.0).001
 16–17322(52.5)267(46.4)589(49.5)
 18–21140(22.8)187(32.5)327(27.5)
Initiated sexual intercourse       
Age 13–155914 
 16–1730(48.4)58(49.2)88(15.3) 
 18–2127(43.5)51(43.2)78(24.5) 
Used contraceptives at last intercourse       
Age 13–154711 
 16–1725(83.3)45(77.6)70(79.5) 
 18–2126(96.3)41(80.4)67(85.9) 

aThe analysis is based on respondents to all questions in the table.

bThe internal drop-out range between 7–33 (0.6–2.7%).

cPearson’s χ2 test was used and the significance level was set at p < .05

aThe analysis is based on respondents to all questions in the table. bThe internal drop-out range between 7–33 (0.6–2.7%). cPearson’s χ2 test was used and the significance level was set at p < .05

Abortion stigma

Responses reflecting the students’ responses on abortion stigma are presented in Table 2. Agreement with abortion stigma was seen in the Negative Stereotyping sub-scale, where the strongest agreement for a single item was “A girl who has an abortion is committing a sin”, with 89.9% agreement, followed by “A girl who has an abortion brings shame to her family”, which showed 73.4% agreement.
Table 2.

Frequency distribution of answers given to the questionnaire with ASABA scale

ASABA scale items4) Agree and 5) strongly agree 3) Not sure 1) Strongly disagree and 2) disagreeMeanSDNMissing
n(%)n(%)n(%)   n(%)
1.A girl who has an induced abortion is committing a sin1085(89.9)24(2)98(8.1)4.481.0712070(0)
2.Once a girl has one abortion, she will make it a habit625(51.8)235(19.5)341(28.3)3.351.3212016(0.5)
3.A girl who has an abortion cannot be trusted456(37.8)183(15.2)563(46.6)2.901.4112025(0.4)
4.A girl who has an abortion brings shame to her family886(73.4)92(7.6)221(18.3)3.891.2811998(0.7)
5.The health of a girl who has an abortion is never as good as it was before the abortion823(68.2)132(10.9)247 (20.5)3.791.3412025(0.4)
6.A girl who has had an abortion might be a bad influence on other women651(53.9)141(11.7)408(33.8)3.281.4312007(0.6)
7.A girl who has an abortion will be a bad mother273(22.6)238(19.7)693(57.4)2.501.3212043(0.2)
8.A girl who has an abortion brings shame to her community694(57.5)165(13.7)345(28.6)3.481.3912043(0.2)
9.A girl who has had an abortion should be prohibited from going to religious services56(4.6)39(3.2)1103(91.4)1.510.8611989(0.7)
10.A girl who has had an abortion should be teased so that she will be ashamed about her decision199(16.5)110(9.1)890(73.7)2.081.2411998(0.7)
11.A girl should be disgraced in my community if she has had an abortion136(11.3)156(12.9)903(74.8)1.991.11119512(1.0)
12.A man should not marry a woman who has had an abortion153(12.7)155(12.8)892(73.9)2.051.1812007(0.6)
13.A girl who has had an abortion should no longer be associated with122(10.1)85(7)993(82.3)1.841.0812007(0.6)
14.A girl who had an abortion should be pointed fingers at so that other people would know what she has done116(9.6)68(5.6)1015(84.1)1.741.0511998(0.7)
15.A girl who has an abortion should not be treated the same as everyone else110(9.1)54(4.5)1035(85.7)1.721.0711998(0.7)
16.A girl who has had an abortion can make other people fall ill or get sick90(7.5)93(7.7)1017(84.3)1.641.0212007(0.6)
17.A girl who has had an abortion should be isolated from other people in the community for at least 4 weeks after having an abortion136(11.3)225(18.6)839(69.5)2.091.1212007(0.6)
18.If a boy has sex with a girl who has had an abortion, he will most likely become infected with a disease108(8.9)248(20.5)844(69.9)1.951.1412007(0.6)

aThe analysis is based on respondents to all questions in the table.

bThe internal drop-out range between 0 and 12 (0–1.0%).

aThe analysis is based on respondents to all questions in the table. bThe internal drop-out range between 0 and 12 (0–1.0%).

Contraceptive use stigma

Responses reflecting students’ attitudes and beliefs on contraceptive use are presented in Table 3. The strongest agreement was seen for the item “A girl who uses contraception will encourage others to be promiscuous”, with 47% agreement (mean 3.15; SD 1.4). Contraceptive use was considered physically harmful by 45.1% of the respondents (mean 3.18; SD 1.45). Agreement with contraceptive use stigma was seen among 40.8% of the respondents (mean 3.08; SD 1.42) who related the use of contraceptives to promiscuous female sexual behaviour. Contraceptive use was seen by 26.5% (mean 2.59; 1.36) of the adolescents as predominantly for married women.
Table 3.

Frequency distribution of answers given to the questionnaire with CUS scale

CUS scale items4) Agree and 5) strongly agree3) Not sure1) Strongly disagree and 2) disagreeMeanSDNMissing
n(%)n(%)n(%)   n(%)
1.A girl who uses a contraceptive method is promiscuous492(40.8)262(21.7)433(35.9)3.081.42118720(1.7)
2.A girl who uses a contraceptive method will encourage others to be promiscuous566(46.9)197(16.3)430(35.6)3.151.40119314(1.2)
3.A girl cannot decide for herself if to use a contraceptive method220(18.2)244(20.2)723(59.9)2.371.26118720(1.7)
4.A married woman is more deserving of a contraceptive method than an unmarried woman320(26.5)240(19.9)632(52.4)2.591.36119215(1.2)
5.A girl who uses contraceptives will have problem when she decides to get pregnant544(45.1)240(19.9)400(33.1)3.181.45118423(1.9)
6.A girl who carries condoms is likely to have many sexual partners447(37.0)191(15.8)552(45.7)2.861.49119017(1.4)
7.A girl should not insist to use a condom, it is the man to decide whether to use a condom or not129(10.7)120(9.9)944(78.2)1.801.18119314(1.2)

aThe analysis is based on respondents who responded to all items in the table.

bThe internal drop-out range between 14 and 23 (1.2–1.9%).

aThe analysis is based on respondents who responded to all items in the table. bThe internal drop-out range between 14 and 23 (1.2–1.9%). Table 4 shows the mean scores for the ASABA and CUS scales by gender. The mean total score for responses on abortion stigma among male students (47.56, SD 9.43) was higher than that among female students (mean 45.04, SD 9.55): p < .001. The mean total score for responses on contraception use stigma was also higher among male students (mean 19.67, SD 5.17) than among female students (mean 18.41, SD 5.68); p < .001.
Table 4.

Descriptive statistics for the scales of ASABA and CUS, by gendera

Scales Female (n = 618)Male (n = 582)Total sample (n = 1207)P-valuec
Score rangeMean(SD)Mean(SD)Mean(SD)
Total ASABA score (18 items)18–9045.04(9.55)47.56(9.43)46.27(9.57).000
Negative stereotyping (8 items)8–4027.43(6.28)27.96(5.49)27.68(5.91).125
Exclusion and discrimination (7 items)7–3512.17(4.23)13.74(4.86)12.94(4.61).000
Fear of contagion (3 items)3–155.47(2.14)5.91(2.36)5.68(2.26).001
Total CUS score (7 items)7–3518.41(5.68)19.67(5.17)19.04(5.48).000

aThe internal dropout had a range of 9–53 (0.7–4.4%).

bThe analysis is based on respondents who responded to all items in the table.

cPearson’s χ2 test was used and the significance level was set at p < .05

aThe internal dropout had a range of 9–53 (0.7–4.4%). bThe analysis is based on respondents who responded to all items in the table. cPearson’s χ2 test was used and the significance level was set at p < .05

High and low scores

On the ASABA scale, 52.3% of the students had high abortion stigma scores (summed score ≥ 46), while the remaining 47.7% had low scores (summed score < 46). On the CUS scale, 53.9% of the students had high contraceptive use stigma scores (summed score ≥19), while the remaining 46.1% had low scores. A larger proportion of male students expressed high abortion stigma (57.7%) compared to the female students (49.0%); p = .003. Similarly, for contraceptive use stigma, a larger proportion of male students (58.5%) than female students (50.6%); p = .007 had high total CUS scale scores. On average, the youngest age group (13–15 years) had higher stigma scores on abortion and contraceptive use than the older age groups. No association was seen between sexual debut and high abortion stigma (p = .899) or contraceptive use stigma (p = .823) (data not shown). A binary logistic regression was run to assess the independent factors associated with a high level of stigmatising attitudes on abortion and contraceptive use (Table 5). The model was adjusted for sex and age. The results showed that the boys had higher stigmatising attitudes compared to the girls (OR 1.68; p < .001), and the older age-groups had less stigmatising attitudes compared to the youngest age group (13–15), age 16–17 (OR 0.77; p = .009), respectively age 18–21 (OR 0.58; p = .001). The goodness of fit of the logistic regression model was evaluated with the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (p = .736) and the Nagelkerke R Squared (p = .32).
Table 5.

A binary logistic regression of factors associated with stigmatising attitudes on abortion and contraceptive use among secondary school students (n = 1179/1207)

Independent factorsAssociations with high level of stigma (summed score ≥ 65)
Students (n = 1179)
ORaCI 95%P value
Male students1.681.33–2.12<.001
Reference group: female students
Age 16–17 years0.770.50–0.90.009
Reference group: 13–15 years
Age 18–21 years0.580.42–0.80.001
Reference group: 13–15 years   

aBinary logistic regression (of students who responded to all the questions included in the model = 1179/1207), presented as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

aBinary logistic regression (of students who responded to all the questions included in the model = 1179/1207), presented as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to measure stigmatising attitudes and beliefs toward girls associated with abortion and contraceptive use among secondary school students in Kenya. The results show that attitudes and beliefs in relation to abortion stigma and contraceptive use stigma are evident among secondary school students in western Kenya. A majority considered abortion to be a sin, as well as shameful for the family and the community, while contraceptive use was associated with a promiscuous lifestyle. We postulate that the word sin has a religious basis and religion may have influenced the responses found in this study. Almost half of the students believed contraceptive use would negatively impact fertility. These quantitative findings are consistent with a recent systematic literature review on qualitative studies on abortion and contraception use attitudes among adolescents from LMICs.[22] The view that a girl who has an abortion not only brings shame to her family and community, but also that she will make it a habit and that she can have bad influence on other women, may be considered a resilient community norm based on cultural traditions.[17] The results from this study indicate that respondents related the use of contraceptives to promiscuous female sexual behaviour. Participants also stated that contraceptive use was predominantly for married women. Abortion and contraceptive use were considered physically harmful by a large proportion of the respondents. Misconceptions, such as infertility caused by contraceptive use, have been documented previously,[23,24] and could be among the reasons for the high unmet need for contraception among young people in Kenya.[25] The ASABA scale item “The health of a girl who has an abortion is never as good as it was before the abortion”, is more complicated to analyse. While for safe induced abortion the risk of severe complications is minimal, women in Kenya are aware of the risks of an unsafe abortion, which may have impacted the result. The high incidence in Kenya of unsafe abortion[4] and related complications,[26] could be a reason why most of the respondents strongly agreed or agreed with this item. On the other hand, social stigma towards women faced with unintended pregnancy may force them to choose a back-street abortion with unsafe procedures to avoid stigma.[13] The results showed clear gender power dynamics. Male students had a higher total mean score for both abortion stigma and contraceptive use stigma compared to female students. These findings are consistent with previous research on gender-based differences in abortion attitudes.[27] Previous research from Uganda and South Africa indicated that males’ negative attitudes towards abortion can serve as a barrier to safe abortion and post-abortion care.[28,29] However, the pervasiveness of negative attitudes towards abortion and contraceptive use among women suggests that women may also perpetuate abortion and contraceptive use stigma.[30] In a recent qualitative study, Kenyan men expressed that contraceptive use indicated female promiscuity and unfaithful women secretly use contraceptives. Evidently, reproductive decision-making is strongly male-dominated in Kenya.[13,31] The principal decision-maker regarding the termination of pregnancy and contraceptive use in Kenya is often the male partner.[13,31] Furthermore, the youngest age group (13–15 years) showed higher levels of stigmatising attitudes towards abortion and contraceptive use than the older age groups. It appears that older secondary school students have more supportive attitudes towards abortion and contraceptive use. By age the proportion of youth with sexual intercourse increases. A prior study from the region showed that girls with experience of sexual intercourse had lower levels of attitudes in relation to Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) stigma[32]; however, association between having had intercourse and level of stigma could not be confirmed in the current study. It may be that the students in this study had double standards, i.e. their attitudes regarding abortion and contraceptive use had no impact on whether they engaged in sexual intercourse or not. However, due to the sensitivity of this question in a classroom survey, it is more reasonable to assume that the students might not have provided honest answers about their experience of sexual intercourse. A relatively small proportion of this sample had initiated intercourse compared with the national average.[4]

Strengths and limitations

Some strengths of this study were the rigorous design, large sample size and low internal dropout. This study is timely and can fill some research gaps related to adolescents’ attitudes and beliefs regarding abortion and contraceptive use. Scientific publications within this topic from settings with restricted abortion laws and with a sample of secondary school students are rare. However, despite the questionnaire being validated, a classroom survey may introduce some misinterpretation of the questions. Another limitation introduced by a classroom survey of this sensitive topic is that the students may not reveal their honest opinions, as they may fear that their classmates or teachers could see their responses, although these students were assured, in writing and verbally, that access to the results was restricted to the research team. In addition, the questionnaire only included age and gender as background characteristics to protect respondents’ confidentiality and to offer a safe environment for the adolescents to respond honestly to the questions. Accordingly, the outcome was based on ordinal data with only two variables (a narrow age span, and gender) and thus the data were not appropriate for linear regression analysis. A non-parametric test such as the chi-squared test was used, therefore, in addition to a binary logistic regression which adjusted for age and gender.

Conclusion

This study showed that abortion and contraceptive use are highly stigmatised by students in Kenya. Contraceptive use stigma may contribute to unintended pregnancies and consequently unsafe abortions. The association between contraceptive use stigma and abortion stigma needs to be further investigated. The results from this study attest to the importance of gender- and age-appropriate information and education in order to dispel stigmatising attitudes towards abortion and contraceptive use. Understanding adolescents’ attitudes and beliefs regarding abortion and contraceptive use is important to effectively address SRHR issues affecting this sexually active age group. Furthermore, this age group will be influencers and leaders for attitudes in the near future. The outcomes from this analysis could be used in SRHR programming, including CSE curricula development and stigma reduction programmes. CSE and stigma reduction programmes should include evidence and rights-based approaches to account for safe abortion and contraceptive use.
  22 in total

1.  Mens' attitudes about abortion in Uganda.

Authors:  Ann M Moore; Gabriel Jagwe-Wadda; Akinrinola Bankole
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2010-09-17

2.  Differences in abortion attitudes by policy context and between men and women in the World Values Survey.

Authors:  Dana Loll; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2018-09-26

3.  Gendered power dynamics and women's negotiation of family planning in a high HIV prevalence setting: a qualitative study of couples in western Kenya.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Harrington; Shari Dworkin; Mellissa Withers; Maricianah Onono; Zachary Kwena; Sara J Newmann
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2015-10-26

4.  Abortion and contraception: attitudes of South african university students.

Authors:  Cynthia J Patel; Trisha Kooverjee
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2009-06

Review 5.  Health care providers' perceptions of and attitudes towards induced abortions in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: a systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative data.

Authors:  Ulrika Rehnström Loi; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Elisabeth Faxelid; Marie Klingberg-Allvin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Motivations and Constraints to Family Planning: A Qualitative Study in Rwanda's Southern Kayonza District.

Authors:  Didi Bertrand Farmer; Leslie Berman; Grace Ryan; Lameck Habumugisha; Paulin Basinga; Cameron Nutt; Francois Kamali; Elias Ngizwenayo; Jacklin St Fleur; Peter Niyigena; Fidele Ngabo; Paul E Farmer; Michael L Rich
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2015-05-13

7.  Human rights versus societal norms: a mixed methods study among healthcare providers on social stigma related to adolescent abortion and contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya.

Authors:  Miranda Håkansson; Monica Oguttu; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Marlene Makenzius
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-03-05

8.  Adolescent Pregnancy and Challenges in Kenyan Context: Perspectives from Multiple Community Stakeholders.

Authors:  Manasi Kumar; Keng-Yen Huang; Caleb Othieno; Dalton Wamalwa; Beatrice Madeghe; Judith Osok; Simon Njuguna Kahonge; Joyce Nato; Mary McKernon McKay
Journal:  Glob Soc Welf       Date:  2017-10-25

9.  Contraception and abortion knowledge, attitudes and practices among adolescents from low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Margarate Nzala Munakampe; Joseph Mumba Zulu; Charles Michelo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Decision-making preceding induced abortion: a qualitative study of women's experiences in Kisumu, Kenya.

Authors:  Ulrika Rehnström Loi; Matilda Lindgren; Elisabeth Faxelid; Monica Oguttu; Marie Klingberg-Allvin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.223

View more
  5 in total

1.  Stigma surrounding contraceptive use and abortion among secondary school teachers: A cross-sectional study in Western Kenya.

Authors:  Marielle E Meurice; Beatrice Otieno; Jenny J Chang; Marlene Makenzius
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2021-02-07

2.  Eliminating stigma and discrimination in sexual and reproductive health care: a public health imperative.

Authors:  Julia Hussein; Laura Ferguson
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2019-12

3.  Foreign assistance or attack? Impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health and rights in Kenya.

Authors:  Boniface Ayanbekongshie Ushie; Kenneth Juma; Grace Kimemia; Maggie Magee; Emily Maistrellis; Terry McGovern; Sara E Casey
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12

4.  "Spoiled" girls: Understanding social influences on adolescent contraceptive decision-making in Kenya.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Harrington; Edinah Casmir; Peninah Kithao; John Kinuthia; Grace John-Stewart; Alison L Drake; Jennifer A Unger; Kenneth Ngure
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Uptake and provision of self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health: findings from a global values and preferences survey.

Authors:  Carmen H Logie; Isha Berry; Laura Ferguson; Kalonde Malama; Holly Donkers; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2021
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.