Literature DB >> 31532857

The impact of graft remodeling on peri-implant bone support at implants placed concomitantly with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter, retrospective case series.

Giovanni Franceschetti1, Roberto Farina1,2, Luigi Minenna1, Orio Riccardi1,3, Claudio Stacchi4, Rosario Di Raimondo5, Elisa Maietti6,7, Leonardo Trombelli1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on peri-implant bone support (as assessed on periapical radiographs) of the remodeling dynamics of varying graft biomaterials used for transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE).
METHODS: The study is a multicenter, retrospective series of cases undergone tSFE (performed according to the Smart Lift technique) and concomitant implant placement. At operator's discretion, tSFE was performed with bone core (BC) alone or supplemented by deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral (DBBM and DPBM, respectively), synthetic hydroxyapatite in a collagen matrix (S-HA), or ß-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP). Immediately after surgery, at 6-12 months post-surgery, and at later (≥24 months) follow-up intervals, the percentage proportion of the implant surface in direct contact with the radiopaque area was calculated for the entire implant surface (totCON%). Also, the height of the graft apical to the implant apex (aGH) was assessed.
RESULTS: At 6-12 months following tSFE, median totCON% was 100%, with a median aGH of 1.4 mm. A tendency of aGH to decrease in height was observed at later follow-up intervals for sites treated with all grafting procedures. In all treatment groups, the majority of the implant surface was still surrounded by the radiopaque area at the longest follow-up visits.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the height of the peri-implant radiopaque area apical to the implant apex tends to reduce overtime at sites which have received tSFE, the peri-implant bone support seems to be maintained long term irrespective of the graft material used.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regeneration; dental implants; maxillary sinus; minimally invasive surgical procedures; oral surgical procedures

Year:  2019        PMID: 31532857     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  [Retrospective study on transcrestal sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implantation of short implants].

Authors:  Jiang-Qin Huang; Chang-Qi Hu; Xun Xia; Shui-Gen Guo; Jin-Mei Gong; Hong-Wu Wei
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Modified Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Technique for Multiple Edentulous Spaces: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Caojie Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Radiographic Analysis of Graft Dimensional Changes in Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Luca Comuzzi; Margherita Tumedei; Adriano Piattelli; Gianluca Tartaglia; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Peri-implant tissue conditions following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: 3-year results of a bi-center, randomized trial.

Authors:  Roberto Farina; Anna Simonelli; Giovanni Franceschetti; Luigi Minenna; Gian Pietro Schincaglia; Orio Riccardi; Leonardo Trombelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Vertical Bone Gain after Sinus Lift Procedures with Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate and Simultaneous Implant Placement-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Aragoneses Lamas; Margarita Gómez Sánchez; Leví Cuadrado González; Ana Suárez García; Javier Aragoneses Sánchez
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.