| Literature DB >> 31532801 |
Yuanyuan Shao1,2, Guantao Xuan1,3, Zhichao Hu2, Zongmei Gao4, Lei Liu1.
Abstract
Determination and classification of the bruise degree for cherry can improve consumer satisfaction with cherry quality and enhance the industry's competiveness and profitability. In this study, visible and near infrared (Vis-NIR) reflection spectroscopy was used for identifying bruise degree of cherry in 350-2500 nm. Sampling spectral data were extracted from normal, slight and severe bruise samples. Principal component analysis (PCA) was implemented to determine the first few principal components (PCs) for cluster analysis among samples. Optimal wavelengths were selected by loadings of PCs from PCA and successive projection algorithm (SPA) method, respectively. Afterwards, these optimal wavelengths were empolyed to establish the classification models as inputs of least square-support vector machine (LS-SVM). Better performance for qualitative discrimination of the bruise degree for cherry was emerged in LS-SVM model based on five optimal wavelengths (603, 633, 679, 1083, and 1803 nm) selected directly by SPA, which showed acceptable results with the classification accuracy of 93.3%. Confusion matrix illustrated misclassification generally occurred in normal and slight bruise samples. Furthermore, the latent relation between spectral property of cherries in varying bruise degree and its firmness and soluble solids content (SSC) was analyzed. The result showed both colour, firmness and SSC were consistent with the Vis-NIR reflectance of cherries. Overall, this study revealed that Vis-NIR reflection spectroscopy integrated with multivariate analysis can be used as a rapid, intact method to determine the bruise degree of cherry, laying a foundation for cherry sorting and postharvest quality control.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31532801 PMCID: PMC6750588 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222633
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1‘Huangmi’ cherry samples in varying bruise degree.
(a) Normal; (b) slight bruise; (c) severe bruise.
Classification and sample number of cherries in varying bruise degree.
| Bruise degree | Sample number | Calibration | Prediction | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 100 | 79 | 21 | 1 |
| Slight bruise | 100 | 75 | 25 | 2 |
| Severe Bruise | 100 | 71 | 29 | 3 |
Fig 2Key steps of the experimental procedure.
Fig 3Spectral reflectance curves of the sampled ‘Huangmi’ cherry.
Fig 4Cluster plots based on PC-1 and PC-2 for different cherry categories samples.
(a) cluster plot based on PC-1 and PC-2 between normal and slight bruise; (b) cluster plot based on PC-1 and PC-2 between normal and severe bruise; (c) cluster plot based on PC-1 and PC-2 between slight and severe bruise; (d) cluster plot based on PC-1 and PC-2 between normal, slight and severe bruise.
Fig 5Loadings plots of the PC-1 and PC-2 for different cherry categories samples.
(a) Loadings of the PC-1 and PC-2 for normal and slight bruise; (b) Loadings of the PC-1 and PC-2 for normal and severe bruise; (c) Loadings of the PC-1 and PC-2 for slight and severe bruise; (d) Loadings of the PC-1 and PC-2 for normal, slight and severe bruise.
LS-SVM model identification results based on optimal wavelengths and full spectra.
| Wavelength selection | Optimal wavelengths | Variable | Prediction | Accuracy /% | Overall accuracy /% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| Full spectra | 1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 95.2 | 97.3 | |
| 2 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 96 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 100 | |||
| Loading of PCs | 577, 603, 832 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 71.4 | 80 |
| 2 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 72 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 93.1 | |||
| SPA (indirect) | 365, 457, 514, 585, 606, 654 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 85.7 | 90.7 |
| 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 88 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 96.6 | |||
| SPA (direct) | 603, 633, 679, 1083, 1803 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 90.5 | 93.3 |
| 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 88 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 100 | |||
Statistic data of firmness and SSC in cheery samples.
| Samples | Firmness (kg/cm2) | SSC (°Brix) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum | Minimum | Mean | SD | Maximum | Minimum | Mean | SD | |
| Normal | 4.66 | 2.85 | 3.81 | 0.462 | 16.9 | 13 | 15.26 | 1.207 |
| Slight bruise | 5.6 | 3.11 | 4.12 | 0.583 | 18.4 | 14 | 15.81 | 1.138 |
| Severe bruise | 4.43 | 2.07 | 3.07 | 0.63 | 19.5 | 12.6 | 15.33 | 1.991 |
Note:
*SD = Standard deviation.