Literature DB >> 31532454

Association Between Current and Future Annual Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mortality Rates.

Alexander T Sandhu1, Shun Kohsaka1,2, Jay Bhattacharya3,4, William F Fearon1, Robert A Harrington1, Paul A Heidenreich1,5.   

Abstract

Importance: Multiple states publicly report a hospital's risk-adjusted mortality rate for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a quality measure. However, whether reported annual PCI mortality is associated with a hospital's future performance is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between reported risk-adjusted hospital PCI-related mortality and a hospital's future PCI-related mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used data from the New York Percutaneous Intervention Reporting System from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2016, to assess hospitals that perform PCI. Exposures: Public-reported, risk-adjusted, 30-day mortality after PCI. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary analysis evaluated the association between a hospital's reported risk-adjusted PCI-related mortality and future PCI-related mortality. The correlation between a hospital's observed to expected (O/E) PCI-related mortality rates each year and future O/E mortality ratios was assessed. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association between index year O/E mortality and O/E mortality in subsequent years while adjusting for PCI volume and patient severity.
Results: This study included 67 New York hospitals and 960 hospital-years. Hospitals with low PCI-related mortality (O/E mortality ratio, ≤1) and high mortality (O/E mortality ratio, >1) had inverse associations between their O/E mortality ratio in the index year and the subsequent change in the ratio (hospitals with low mortality, r = -0.45; hospitals with high mortality, r = -0.60). Little of the variation in risk-adjusted mortality was explained by prior performance. An increase in the O/E mortality ratio from 1.0 to 2.0 in the index year was associated with a higher O/E mortality ratio of only 0.15 (95% CI, 0.02-0.27) in the following year. Conclusions and Relevance: At hospitals with high or low PCI-related mortality rates, the rates largely regressed to the mean the following year. A hospital's risk-adjusted mortality rate was poorly associated with its future mortality. The annual hospital PCI-related mortality may not be a reliable factor associated with hospital quality to consider in a practice change or when helping patients select high-quality hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31532454      PMCID: PMC6751759          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  18 in total

Review 1.  The New York State cardiac registries: history, contributions, limitations, and lessons for future efforts to assess and publicly report healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Kimberly Cozzens; Spencer B King; Gary Walford; Nirav R Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Assessment of Operator Variability in Risk-Standardized Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the NCDR.

Authors:  Jacob A Doll; Dadi Dai; Matthew T Roe; John C Messenger; Matthew W Sherwood; Abhiram Prasad; Ehtisham Mahmud; John S Rumsfeld; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Institutional Costs and Physician Burden.

Authors:  Rishi K Wadhera; Colin W O'Brien; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Kalon K L Ho; Duane S Pinto; Frederic S Resnic; Pinak B Shah; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  A Survey of Interventional Cardiologists' Attitudes and Beliefs About Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Daniel M Blumenthal; Linda R Valsdottir; Yuansong Zhao; Changyu Shen; Ajay J Kirtane; Duane S Pinto; Fred S Resnic; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Jason H Wasfy; Roxana Mehran; Ken Rosenfield; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Association between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Stephen W Waldo; James M McCabe; Cashel O'Brien; Kevin F Kennedy; Karen E Joynt; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Frederick G P Welt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Patient and Physician Perspectives on Public Reporting of Mortality Ratings for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York State.

Authors:  Genaro Fernandez; Craig R Narins; Jeffrey Bruckel; Brian Ayers; Frederick S Ling
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-09

8.  The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly.

Authors:  E D Peterson; E R DeLong; J G Jollis; L H Muhlbaier; D B Mark
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Taking the "Public" Out of Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Rishi K Wadhera; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; M Racz; E Shields; M R Chassin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.