Literature DB >> 31532052

The prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: An observational study of 19 798 Ambulatory subjects.

Jérémy Barben1, Didier Menu2, Clémentine Rosay1, Jérémie Vovelle1, Anca-Maria Mihai1, Valentine Nuss1, Philippe d'Athis3, Alain Putot1, Patrick Manckoundia1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed to elderly people, but the epidemiologic data for this population remains scarce. We compared the elderly population taking DOACs and those not taking DOACs (noDOAC).
METHOD: We included individuals over 75 years old, affiliated to Mutualité Sociale Agricole of Burgundy (a French regional health insurance agency), who had been refunded for a prescribed DOAC between 1st and 30th September 2017. The DAOC group (DAOCG) and noDOAC group (noDOACG) were compared in terms of demographic conditions, registered chronic diseases (RCD), and number and types of prescribed drugs. In the DOACG, we compared the type of prescribing physician and laboratory monitoring for novel prescriptions (initial) and prescription refills (≥ 3 months).
RESULTS: Of the 19 798 included patients, 1518 (7.7%) were prescribed DAOCs and 18 280 (92.3%) were not. Mean and median age was 85 years in the 2 groups (DOACG and noDOACG). In the DOACG, there were more men (50% vs 40.2%), more RCD (88.9% vs 68.7%) and more drugs per prescription (6 ± 2.8 vs 5 ± 2.9) (All P < .01). The DOACG also took more antihypertensive drugs. The most commonly prescribed DOACs were apixaban (42.9%) followed by rivaroxaban (38.4%) and dabigatran (18.6%). Complete blood count, serum creatinine and coagulation function tests were requested for 69.4%, 75% and 22.2%, respectively, of patients prescribed DAOCs.
CONCLUSIONS: The DOACG had more RCD and drugs per prescription than the noDOACG; routine laboratory monitoring was insufficient. What's known Platelet aggregation inhibitors (low-dose) are recommended for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients suffering from symptomatic atherosclerosis. The main risk of this treatment is bleeding. What's new A prescription for platelet aggregation inhibitors was found in 34% of geriatric inpatients in this prospective study. Compliance to guidelines was better for symptomatic peripheral artery disease than for primary prevention in accordance with recent publications. Geriatric comorbidities had no impact on the prescription of platelet aggregation inhibitors. Underuse of platelet aggregation inhibitors was observed in 11.3% of cases and overuse in 13.7% of cases.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31532052     DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  2 in total

1.  Inappropriate Use of Oral Antithrombotic Combinations in an Outpatient Setting and Associated Risks: A French Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lorène Zerah; Dominique Bonnet-Zamponi; Aya Ajrouche; Jean-Philippe Collet; Yann De Rycke; Florence Tubach
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Impact of a Prescription Support Tool to Improve Adherence to the Guidelines for the Prescription of Oral Antithrombotics: The Combi-AT Randomized Controlled Trial Using Clinical Vignettes.

Authors:  Lorène Zerah; Dominique Bonnet-Zamponi; Agnès Dechartres; Paul Frappé; Marie Hauguel-Moreau; Jean-Philippe Collet; Yann De Rycke; Florence Tubach
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.