BACKGROUND: A challenging decision exists as whether to abandon or remove noninfectious superfluous leads during lead revisions or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) upgrades. There is insufficient data in the Asian population to guide decision making. METHODS: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extractions (TLEs) in a high-volume Japanese center. Among a total of 341 patients who underwent lead revisions or CIED upgrades between 2008 and 2018, 53 patients (16%) who underwent TLEs to remove the superfluous leads were analyzed. RESULTS: Indications for TLE were vascular issues (60%), recalled leads (21%), growth of the body size (6%), abandoned leads in young patients (6%), switch to a subcutaneous implanted cardiac defibrillator (4%), need for an MRI conditional CIED (2%), and risks of vascular injury (2%). The population included 29 patients (55%) with nonfunctional leads and 24 (45%) with functional abandoned leads. A total of 74 target leads (mean 1.4 leads/person, median lead age 6.7 years) were extracted with a complete removal achieved in 98%. All coexisting leads, intended for continued use, were not damaged. All new leads (mean 1.4 leads/person) that had been simultaneously implanted during the TLE procedures were successfully implanted. There was one minor complication (2%) involving a pericardial effusion but it did not affect the hemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS: In this Japanese single center experience, the removal of noninfectious superfluous leads with TLEs seemed to be a safe and effective therapeutic option.
BACKGROUND: A challenging decision exists as whether to abandon or remove noninfectious superfluous leads during lead revisions or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) upgrades. There is insufficient data in the Asian population to guide decision making. METHODS: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extractions (TLEs) in a high-volume Japanese center. Among a total of 341 patients who underwent lead revisions or CIED upgrades between 2008 and 2018, 53 patients (16%) who underwent TLEs to remove the superfluous leads were analyzed. RESULTS: Indications for TLE were vascular issues (60%), recalled leads (21%), growth of the body size (6%), abandoned leads in young patients (6%), switch to a subcutaneous implanted cardiac defibrillator (4%), need for an MRI conditional CIED (2%), and risks of vascular injury (2%). The population included 29 patients (55%) with nonfunctional leads and 24 (45%) with functional abandoned leads. A total of 74 target leads (mean 1.4 leads/person, median lead age 6.7 years) were extracted with a complete removal achieved in 98%. All coexisting leads, intended for continued use, were not damaged. All new leads (mean 1.4 leads/person) that had been simultaneously implanted during the TLE procedures were successfully implanted. There was one minor complication (2%) involving a pericardial effusion but it did not affect the hemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS: In this Japanese single center experience, the removal of noninfectious superfluous leads with TLEs seemed to be a safe and effective therapeutic option.
Authors: S A Ayvazyan; A B Gamzaev; A A Palagina; K G Gorshenin; S I Buslaeva; A A Seregin; N S Konovalov; O V Sapelnikov Journal: Sovrem Tekhnologii Med Date: 2021-02-28