| Literature DB >> 31531365 |
Magdalena Weber-Rajek1, Agnieszka Radzimińska1, Agnieszka Strączyńska1, Katarzyna Strojek1, Zuzanna Piekorz1, Mariusz Kozakiewicz2, Hanna Styczyńska1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of pelvic floor muscle training on the irisin (Ir) concentration in overweight or obese elderly women with stress urinary incontinence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31531365 PMCID: PMC6720047 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7356187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1The study flow diagram.
Comparative analysis of all measured variables for the EG and CG – the initial assessment.
| Parameter | Statistics | EG | CG | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| IQR | 2.00 | 6.00 | 0.630 |
| Med | 62.50 | 67.00 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| IQR | 2.40 | 2.85 | 1.000 |
| Med | 26.67 | 27.22 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| IQR | 2.67 | 1.77 | 1.000 |
| Med | 9.02 | 5.91 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| IQR | 6.00 | 3.00 | 1.000 |
| Med | 10.00 | 7.00 | ||
EG – experimental group; CG – control group; Med – median; IQR – interquartile range;
p – significance level; RUIS – Revised Urinary Incontinence Scale; BMI-Body Mass Index
Comparative analysis of all measured variables for the EG and CG – at the initial and final assessments.
| Parameter | Statistics | EG (n=28) | p value | CG (n=21) | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial assessment | Final assessment | Initial assessment | Final assessment | ||||
|
| IQR | 2.67 | 3.49 | < 0.001 | 1.77 | 3.01 | 0.079 |
| Med | 9.02 | 11.19 | 5.91 | 6.55 | |||
|
| |||||||
|
| IQR | 6.00 | 5.50 | < 0.001 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 0.124 |
| Med | 10.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | |||
|
| |||||||
|
| IQR | 2.40 | 2.64 | < 0.001 | 2.85 | 3.47 | 0.754 |
| Med | 26.67 | 26.28 | 27.22 | 27.34 | |||
EG – experimental group; CG – control group; Med – median; IQR – interquartile range; p – significance level; RUIS – Revised Urinary Incontinence Scale; BMI – Body Mass Index, ∗ statistical significance
The relationship between the assessment of irisin concentration for the EG at the initial and final assessments and RUIS.
| RUIS | N | Statistics | Irisin concentration (ng/ml) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial assessment | Final assessment | ||||
| Mild | 9 | IQR | 2.86 | 3.42 | 0.007 |
| Med | 9.01 | 10.94 | |||
|
| |||||
| Moderate | 11 | IQR | 2.54 | 5.13 | 0.003 |
| Med | 8.20 | 10.27 | |||
|
| |||||
| Severe | 8 | IQR | 3.74 | 4.73 | 0.011 |
| Med | 10.23 | 12.24 | |||
EG – experimental group; Med – median; IQR – interquartile range; N – number of participants;
p – significance level; RUIS – Revised Urinary Incontinence Scale; ∗statistical significance
Comparative analysis of all measured variables for the EG and CG – the final assessment.
| Parameter | Statistics | EG | CG | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| IQR | 3.49 | 3.01 | 1.000 |
| Med | 11.19 | 6.55 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| IQR | 5.50 | 3.00 | 0.215 |
| Med | 7.00 | 6.00 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| IQR | 2.64 | 3.47 | 1.000 |
| Med | 26.28 | 27.34 | ||
EG – experimental group; CG – control group; Med – median; IQR – interquartile range; p – significance level;
RUIS – Revised Urinary Incontinence Scale; BMI – Body Mass Index
Figure 2The scatter diagram: BMI to Ir concentration at the initial assessment for the experimental group.
Figure 3The scatter diagram: BMI to Ir concentration at the final assessment for the experimental group.
Figure 4The scatter diagram: BMI to Ir concentration at the initial assessment for the control group.
Figure 5The scatter diagram: BMI to Ir concentration at the final assessment for the control group.