| Literature DB >> 31531361 |
Enqin Xia1, Lu Zhai1, Zhigang Huang1, Hairong Liang1, Hui Yang1, Gang Song1, Weiqiao Li1, Huanwen Tang1.
Abstract
DPPH• scavenging peptides (<3kDa) from underutilized Dunaliella salina protein were obtained by the following successive treatment, i.e., ultrasound extraction, simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion hydrolyzation, and membrane ultrafiltration classification. The optimal condition for ultrasound-assisted extraction was an ultrasound wave with 800 W of power treating a mixture of 60 mL of 1.0 mol L-1 NaOH and 2 g algae powder for 15 min. A high correlation (r=0.8146) between DPPH• scavenging activity and yield of the intact peptides showed their antioxidant capacity. Simulated in vitro digestion assay resulted in excellent DPPH• scavenging activity of the total peptide, amounting to (86.5 ± 10.1)%, comparing with the nondigestion samples at (46.8 ± 6.5)%. After fractionation, the 500-1000 Da fraction exhibited the highest DPPH• scavenging activity (81.2 ± 4.0)%, increasing 1.5 times due to digestion. Then, the 500-1000 Da fraction was analyzed by RPLC-Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer, and 4 novel peptides, i.e., Ile-Leu-Thr-Lys-Ala-Ala-Ile-Glu-Gly-Lys, Ile-Ile-Tyr-Phe-Gln-Gly-Lys, Asn-Asp-Pro-Ser-Thr-Val-Lys, and Thr-Val-Arg-Pro-Pro-Gln-Arg, were identified. From these amino acid sequences, hydrophobic residues accounted for 56%, which indicated their high antioxidant property. The results indicated that underutilized protein of Dunaliella salina could be a potential source of antioxidative peptides through simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31531361 PMCID: PMC6720044 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6424651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Extraction and optimization of peptide from the crude extract.
Figure 2Effect of ultrasound radiation on the DPPH• scavenging activities of peptide.
Figure 3The relationship of the yield and DPPH• scavenging activity of peptide.
The yield and DPPH• scavenging activity of non-digested or digested peptide.
| Peptide fraction (Da) | Peptide yield (%) | DPPH• scavenging rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Non-digested | 16.5 ± 1.5 | 46.8 ± 6.5 |
| Digested | 35.7 ± 2.9 | 86.5 ± 10.1 |
The yield, DPPH• scavenging rate of different peptide fractions.
| Peptide fraction (Da) | Peptide yields (%) | DPPH• scavenging rate (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-digestion | Digested | Non-digestion | Digested | |
| 100-500 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.7 | 65.3 ± 8.5 | 35.2 ± 3.1 |
| 500-1000 | 4.9 ± 1.1 | 20.9 ± 2.1 | 34.3 ± 2.9 | 81.2 ± 4.0 |
| 1000-3000 | 6.4 ± 0.5 | 9.1 ± 0.8 | 39.6 ± 6.3 | 45.5 ± 3.7 |
Figure 4The second mass spectrogram of the identified peptides.
Figure 5The ratio of amino acids in the novel peptides.