Literature DB >> 31530966

Default Priors for the Intercept Parameter in Logistic Regressions.

Philip S Boonstra1, Ryan P Barbaro2,3, Ananda Sen1,4.   

Abstract

In logistic regression, separation occurs when a linear combination of predictors perfectly discriminates the binary outcome. Because finite-valued maximum likelihood parameter estimates do not exist under separation, Bayesian regressions with informative shrinkage of the regression coefficients offer a suitable alternative. Classical studies of separation imply that efficiency in estimating regression coefficients may also depend upon the choice of intercept prior, yet relatively little focus has been given on whether and how to shrink the intercept parameter. Alternative prior distributions for the intercept are proposed that downweight implausibly extreme regions of the parameter space, rendering regression estimates that are less sensitive to separation. Through simulation and the analysis of exemplar datasets, differences across priors stratified by established statistics measuring the degree of separation are quantified. Relative to diffuse priors, these proposed priors generally yield more efficient estimation of the regression coefficients themselves when the data are nearly separated. They are equally efficient in non-separated datasets, making them suitable for default use. Modest differences were observed with respect to out-of-sample discrimination. These numerical studies also highlight the interplay between priors for the intercept and the regression coefficients: findings are more sensitive to the choice of intercept prior when using a weakly informative prior on the regression coefficients than an informative shrinkage prior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian Methods; Exponential-Power Distribution; Pivotal Separation; Quasi-Complete Separation; Rare Events

Year:  2018        PMID: 31530966      PMCID: PMC6748335          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  11 in total

1.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.

Authors:  Georg Heinze; Michael Schemper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems.

Authors:  H JEFFREYS
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci       Date:  1946

3.  The estimation from individual records of the relationship between dose and quantal response.

Authors:  D J FINNEY
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1947       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Bayesian regression in SAS software.

Authors:  Sheena G Sullivan; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  A computer program for linear logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  E T Lee
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1974-10

7.  Effect of fetal monitoring on neonatal death rates.

Authors:  R R Neutra; S E Fienberg; S Greenland; E A Friedman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  GENERALIZED DOUBLE PARETO SHRINKAGE.

Authors:  Artin Armagan; David B Dunson; Jaeyong Lee
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.261

9.  Development and validation of the pediatric risk estimate score for children using extracorporeal respiratory support (Ped-RESCUERS).

Authors:  Ryan P Barbaro; Philip S Boonstra; Matthew L Paden; Lloyd A Roberts; Gail M Annich; Robert H Bartlett; Frank W Moler; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Evaluating Mortality Risk Adjustment Among Children Receiving Extracorporeal Support for Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Ryan P Barbaro; Philip S Boonstra; Kevin W Kuo; David T Selewski; David K Bailly; Cheryl L Stone; Chin Ying Chow; Gail M Annich; Frank W Moler; Matthew L Paden
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.