Literature DB >> 31530763

Measurement of isocenter alignment accuracy and image distortion of an 0.35 T MR-Linac system.

S Dorsch1, P Mann, A Elter, A Runz, C K Spindeldreier, S Klüter, C P Karger.   

Abstract

For hybrid devices combining magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and a linac for radiation treatment, the isocenter accuracy as well as image distortions have to be checked. This study presents a new phantom to investigate MR-Linacs in a single measurement in terms of (i) isocentricity of the irradiation and (ii) alignment of the irradiation and imaging isocenter relative to each other using polymer dosimetry gel as well as (iii) 3-dimensional (3D) geometric MR image distortions. The evaluation of the irradiated gel was performed immediately after irradiation with the imaging component of the 0.35 T MR-Linac using a T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence. Eight plastic grid sheets within the phantom allow for measurement of geometric distortions in 3D by comparing the positions of the grid intersections (control points) within the MR-image with their nominal position obtained from a CT-scan. The distance of irradiation and imaging isocenter in 3D was found to be (0.8  ±  0.9) mm for measurements with 32 image acquisitions. The mean distortion over the whole phantom was (0.60  ±  0.28) mm and 99.8% of the evaluated control points had distortions below 1.5 mm. These geometrical uncertainties have to be considered by additional safety margins.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31530763     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab4540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Visual Isocenter Position Enhanced Review (VIPER): a Cherenkov imaging-based solution for MR-linac daily QA.

Authors:  Daniel A Alexander; Petr Bruza; Aris G Rassias; Jacqueline M Andreozzi; Brian W Pogue; Rongxiao Zhang; David J Gladstone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Assessment of a novel commercial large field of view phantom for comprehensive MR imaging quality assurance of a 0.35T MRgRT system.

Authors:  Benjamin C Lewis; Jaeik Shin; Borna Maraghechi; Benjamin Quinn; Mike Cole; Enzo Barberi; Jin Sung Kim; Olga Green; Taeho Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  3D star shot analysis using MAGAT gel dosimeter for integrated imaging and radiation isocenter verification of MR-Linac system.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Kim; Bitbyeol Kim; Wook-Geun Shin; Jaeman Son; Chang Heon Choi; Jong Min Park; Ui-Jung Hwang; Jung-In Kim; Seongmoon Jung
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 4.  Radiation Dosimetry by Use of Radiosensitive Hydrogels and Polymers: Mechanisms, State-of-the-Art and Perspective from 3D to 4D.

Authors:  Yves De Deene
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-09-19

5.  Fast Isocenter Determination Using 3D Polymer Gel Dosimetry with Kilovoltage Cone-Beam CT Reading and the PolyGeVero-CT Software Package for Linac Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Piotr Maras; Marek Kozicki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 6.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  A Comparison of the Distortion in the Same Field MRI and MR-Linac System With a 3D Printed Phantom.

Authors:  Xuechun Liu; Zhenjiang Li; Yi Rong; Minsong Cao; Hongyu Li; Chuntao Jia; Liting Shi; Weizhao Lu; Guanzhong Gong; Yong Yin; Jianfeng Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.