Literature DB >> 31530662

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple-Dose Injection Therapy: The Relationship Between Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia.

Nick Oliver1, Marga Gimenez2, Peter Calhoun3, Nathan Cohen3, Vanessa Moscardo4, Norbert Hermanns5,6, Guido Freckmann7, Monika Reddy8, Lutz Heinemann9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The inverse relationship between overall glucose control and hypoglycemia risk is weakened by the use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM). We assess the relationship between glucose control and hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes using multiple-dose injection (MDI) regimens, including those at highest risk of hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: CGM data from the intervention (rtCGM) and control (self-monitored blood glucose [SMBG]) phases of the Multiple Daily Injections and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes (DIAMOND) and HypoDE studies were analyzed. The relationship between glucose control (HbA1c and mean rtCGM glucose levels) and percentage time spent in hypoglycemia was explored for thresholds of 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL), and ANOVA across the range of HbA1c and mean glucose was performed.
RESULTS: A nonlinear relationship between mean glucose and hypoglycemia was identified at baseline, with the steepest relationship seen at lower values of mean glucose. The use of rtCGM reduces the exposure to hypoglycemia at all thresholds and flattens the relationship between overall glucose and hypoglycemia, with the most marked impact at lower values of mean glucose and HbA1c. Exposure to hypoglycemia varied at all thresholds across the range of overall glucose at baseline, in the SMBG group, and with rtCGM, but the relationships were weaker in the rtCGM group.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of rtCGM can flatten and attenuate the relationship between overall glucose control and hypoglycemia, exerting its greatest impact at lower values of HbA1c and mean glucose in people with type 1 diabetes using MDI regimens and at highest risk of hypoglycemia.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31530662     DOI: 10.2337/dc19-0977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ischemic brain injury in diabetes and endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Authors:  Ashish K Rehni; Sunjoo Cho; Kunjan R Dave
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 2.  Integration of Islet/Beta-Cell Transplants with Host Tissue Using Biomaterial Platforms.

Authors:  Daniel W Clough; Jessica L King; Feiran Li; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Substantial HbA1c Reduction Following Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring Was Not Associated With Early Worsening of Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Kathryn Linton; Roland H Stimson; Anna R Dover; Shareen Forbes; Karen Madill; Roxanne Annoh; Mark W J Strachan; J A McKnight; Rohana J Wright; Fraser W Gibb
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-19

4.  HbA1c reduction following flash monitoring commencement is not independently associated with adverse diabetic eye disease outcomes in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Muhammad Al-Dalla Ali; Roland H Stimson; Anna R Dover; Shareen Forbes; Roxanne Annoh; Karen Madill; Fraser W Gibb
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.