Literature DB >> 31530452

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in super-obese and super-super-obese patients: a national database analysis.

Hassan Nasser1, Tommy Ivanics2, Shravan Leonard-Murali2, Dania Shakaroun3, Jeffrey Genaw2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence remains contradictory for perioperative outcomes of super-obese (SO) and super-super-obese (SSO) patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To identify national 30-day morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in SO and SSO patients.
SETTING: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
METHODS: All LSG and LRYGB patients from 2015 through 2017 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database were grouped based on body mass index (BMI) as follows: morbidly obese (MO; BMI 35.0-49.9 kg/m2), SO (BMI 50.0-59.9 kg/m2), and SSO (BMI ≥60.0 kg/m2). Complications and mortality within 30 days were compared between BMI groups using Pearson X2 or Fischer's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographic characteristics and co-morbidities, and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was reported for each outcome.
RESULTS: Of 356,621 patients, 71.6% had LSG and 28.4% LRYGB. A total of 272,195 patients were in the MO group, 65,565 in the SO group, and 18,861 in the SSO group. Higher BMI was associated with increased overall morbidity and mortality. The overall complication rate was significantly higher for SO (AOR = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.28 for LSG; AOR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15 for LRYGB) and SSO (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.31-1.58 for LSG; AOR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.45 for LRYGB) compared with the MO group. Mortality was also significantly higher for SO (AOR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.10-2.48 for LSG; AOR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23-2.80 for LRYGB) and SSO (AOR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.98-5.48 for LSG; AOR = 3.32, 95% CI 1.93-5.73 for LRYGB) compared with the MO group.
CONCLUSIONS: SO and SSO patients are at increased risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality compared with MO patients. Despite this elevated perioperative risk, the overall risk of these procedures remains low and acceptable especially as bariatric surgery is the durable treatment option for obesity.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Gastric bypass; Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program; Sleeve gastrectomy; Super-obesity; Super-super-obesity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31530452     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  7 in total

1.  Nomograms for Predicting Non-remission in Patients Who Underwent Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.

Authors:  Rui Mao; Pengsen Guo; Ziwei Lin; Huawu Yang; Muthukumaran Jayachandran; Chenxin Xu; Tongtong Zhang; Shen Qu; Yanjun Liu
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Development of the "OS-SEV90 Score" to Predict Severe Postoperative Complications at 90 Days Following Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Hugo Meunier; Benjamin Menahem; Yannick Le Roux; Adrien Lee Bion; Yoann Marion; Antoine Vallois; Nicolas Contival; Thomas Gautier; Jean Lubrano; Anaïs Briant; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Arnaud Alves
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Outcome of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Patients with Super Obesity (Body Mass Index > 50 kg/m2).

Authors:  Omar Thaher; Wael Tallak; Martin Hukauf; Christine Stroh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Safety of Primary Versus Revisional Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch in Patients with Super Obesity Using the MBSAQIP database.

Authors:  Alice Wang; Huaping Wang; Alexander Abdurakhmanov; Vilok Vijayanagar; Kyle J Thompson; Iain H Mckillop; Selwan Barbat; Roc Bauman; Keith S Gersin; Timothy S Kuwada; Abdelrahman Nimeri
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for High-Risk Patients, High Body Mass Index (> 50 kg/m2) Patients, and Contraindication to Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Renjie Li; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker; Andreas Adler; Maximilian Specht; Wael Eskander; Mahmoud Ismail; Harun Badakhshi; Manoel Passos Galvao; Ricardo Zorron
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  The first survey addressing patients with BMI over 50: a survey of 789 bariatric surgeons.

Authors:  Mohammad Kermansaravi; Panagiotis Lainas; Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri; Wah Yang; Amirhossein Davarpanah Jazi; Ramon Vilallonga; Luciano Antozzi; Chetan Parmar; Radwan Kassir; Sonja Chiappetta; Lorea Zubiaga; Antonio Vitiello; Kamal Mahawar; Miguel Carbajo; Mario Musella; Scott Shikora
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Is One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm Effective in the Treatment of People with Severe Obesity with BMI > 50?

Authors:  Arnaud Liagre; Francesco Martini; Radwan Kassir; Gildas Juglard; Celine Hamid; Hubert Boudrie; Olivier Van Haverbeke; Laura Antolino; Tarek Debs; Niccolo Petrucciani
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.129

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.