Arkadiy L Maksimovskiy1,2, Emily N Oot1,3, Anna M Seraikas1, Maya Rieselbach1, Carolyn Caine1, Jennifer T Sneider1,2, Julia E Cohen-Gilbert1,2, Sion K Harris4,5, Lisa D Nickerson2,6, Michael L Rohan2,7, Marisa M Silveri1,2,3. 1. From the, Neurodevelopmental Laboratory on Addictions and Mental Health, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Applied Neuroimaging Statistics Lab, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts. 7. Brain Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While many adolescents exhibit risky behavior, teenagers with a family history (FH+) of an alcohol use disorder (AUD) are at a heightened risk for earlier initiation of alcohol use, a more rapid escalation in frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption and developing a subsequent AUD in comparison with youth without such family history (FH-). Neuroanatomically, developmentally normative risk-taking behavior parallels an imbalance between more protracted development of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and earlier development of limbic regions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived volumetric properties were obtained for these structures in FH+ and FH- adolescents. METHODS: Forty-two substance-naïve adolescents (13- to 14-year-olds), stratified into FH+ (N = 19, 13 girls) and FH- (N = 23, 11 girls) age/handedness-matched groups, completed MRI scanning at 3.0T, as well as cognitive and clinical testing. T1 images were processed using FreeSurfer to measure PFC and hippocampi/amygdalae subfields/nuclei volumes. RESULTS: FH+ status was associated with larger hippocampal/amygdala volumes (p < 0.05), relative to FH- adolescents, with right amygdala results appearing to be driven by FH+ boys. Volumetric differences also were positively associated with family history density (p < 0.05) of having an AUD. Larger subfields/nuclei volumes were associated with higher anxiety levels and worse auditory verbal learning performance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FH+ risk for AUD is detectable via neuromorphometric characteristics, which precede alcohol use onset and the potential onset of a later AUD, that are associated with emotional and cognitive measures. It is plausible that the development of limbic regions might be altered in FH+ youth, even prior to the onset of alcohol use, which could increase later risk. Thus, targeted preventative measures are warranted that serve to delay the onset of alcohol use in youth, particularly in those who are FH+ for an AUD.
BACKGROUND: While many adolescents exhibit risky behavior, teenagers with a family history (FH+) of an alcohol use disorder (AUD) are at a heightened risk for earlier initiation of alcohol use, a more rapid escalation in frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption and developing a subsequent AUD in comparison with youth without such family history (FH-). Neuroanatomically, developmentally normative risk-taking behavior parallels an imbalance between more protracted development of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and earlier development of limbic regions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived volumetric properties were obtained for these structures in FH+ and FH- adolescents. METHODS: Forty-two substance-naïve adolescents (13- to 14-year-olds), stratified into FH+ (N = 19, 13 girls) and FH- (N = 23, 11 girls) age/handedness-matched groups, completed MRI scanning at 3.0T, as well as cognitive and clinical testing. T1 images were processed using FreeSurfer to measure PFC and hippocampi/amygdalae subfields/nuclei volumes. RESULTS: FH+ status was associated with larger hippocampal/amygdala volumes (p < 0.05), relative to FH- adolescents, with right amygdala results appearing to be driven by FH+ boys. Volumetric differences also were positively associated with family history density (p < 0.05) of having an AUD. Larger subfields/nuclei volumes were associated with higher anxiety levels and worse auditory verbal learning performance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FH+ risk for AUD is detectable via neuromorphometric characteristics, which precede alcohol use onset and the potential onset of a later AUD, that are associated with emotional and cognitive measures. It is plausible that the development of limbic regions might be altered in FH+ youth, even prior to the onset of alcohol use, which could increase later risk. Thus, targeted preventative measures are warranted that serve to delay the onset of alcohol use in youth, particularly in those who are FH+ for an AUD.
Authors: Alecia D Schweinsburg; Martin P Paulus; Valerie C Barlett; Lauren A Killeen; Lisa C Caldwell; Carmen Pulido; Sandra A Brown; Susan F Tapert Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Thomas J Whitford; Christopher J Rennie; Stuart M Grieve; C Richard Clark; Evian Gordon; Leanne M Williams Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Halle R Dimsdale-Zucker; Maureen Ritchey; Arne D Ekstrom; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Philipp G Sämann; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Boris Gutman; Dominik Grotegerd; Ramona Leenings; Claas Flint; Udo Dannlowski; Emily K Clarke-Rubright; Rajendra A Morey; Theo G M van Erp; Christopher D Whelan; Laura K M Han; Laura S van Velzen; Bo Cao; Jean C Augustinack; Paul M Thompson; Neda Jahanshad; Lianne Schmaal Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2020-12-27 Impact factor: 5.038