Literature DB >> 31529374

Commercialization of User Data by Developers of Medicines-Related Apps: a Content Analysis.

Quinn Grundy1,2, Kellia Chiu3, Lisa Bero3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Developers of medicines-related apps collect a variety of technical, health-related, and identifying user information to improve and tailor services. User data may also be used for promotional purposes. Apps, for example, may be used to skirt regulation of direct-to-consumer advertising of medicines. Researchers have documented routine and extensive sharing of user data with third parties for commercial purposes, but little is known about the ways that app developers or "first" parties employ user data.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the nature of user data collection and commercialization by developers of medicines-related apps. APPROACH: We conducted a content analysis of apps' store descriptions, linked websites, policies, and sponsorship prospectuses for prominent medicines-related apps found in the USA, Canada, Australia, and UK Google Play stores in late 2017. Apps were included if they pertained to the prescribing, administration, or use of medicines, and were interactive. Two independent coders extracted data from documents using a structured, open-ended instrument. We performed open, inductive coding to identify the range of promotional strategies involving user data for commercial purposes and wrote descriptive memos to refine and detail these codes. KEY
RESULTS: Ten of 24 apps primarily provided medication adherence services; 14 primarily provided medicines information. The majority (71%, 17/24) outlined at least one promotional strategy involving users' data for commercial purposes which included personalized marketing of the developer's related products and services, highly tailored advertising, third-party sponsorship of targeted content or messaging, and sale of aggregated customer insights to stakeholders.
CONCLUSIONS: App developers may employ users' data in a feedback loop to deliver highly targeted promotional messages from developers, and commercial sponsors, including the pharmaceutical industry. These practices call into question developers' claims about the trustworthiness and independence of purportedly evidenced-based medicines information and may create a risk for mis- or overtreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31529374      PMCID: PMC6854147          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05214-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  1 in total

1.  Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies.

Authors:  Ali Sunyaev; Tobias Dehling; Patrick L Taylor; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Privacy versus Convenience: A Historical Perspective, Analysis of Risks, and an Informatics Call to Action.

Authors:  Larry Ozeran; Anthony Solomonides; Richard Schreiber
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Quality of Physical Activity Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Paganini; Yannik Terhorst; Lasse Bosse Sander; Selma Catic; Sümeyye Balci; Ann-Marie Küchler; Dana Schultchen; Katrin Plaumann; Sarah Sturmbauer; Lena Violetta Krämer; Jiaxi Lin; Ramona Wurst; Rüdiger Pryss; Harald Baumeister; Eva-Maria Messner
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.

Authors:  Andrew Anglemyer; Theresa Hm Moore; Lisa Parker; Timothy Chambers; Alice Grady; Kellia Chiu; Matthew Parry; Magdalena Wilczynska; Ella Flemyng; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-18

Review 4.  Young People's Use of Digital Health Technologies in the Global North: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Deborah Lupton
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Comparison of Discounted and Undiscounted Cash Prices for Cardiovascular Medications by Type of US Community Pharmacy.

Authors:  Minji Hong; Natalia Shcherbakova
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Ethical and regulatory implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the medical devices industry and its representatives.

Authors:  Brette Blakely; Wendy Rogers; Jane Johnson; Quinn Grundy; Katrina Hutchison; Robyn Clay-Williams; Bernadette Richards; Guy Maddern
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.