| Literature DB >> 31529355 |
Adam Felton1, Therese Löfroth2, Per Angelstam3, Lena Gustafsson4, Joakim Hjältén5, Annika M Felton2, Per Simonsson6, Anders Dahlberg7, Matts Lindbladh2, Johan Svensson5, Urban Nilsson2, Isak Lodin2, P O Hedwall2, Anna Sténs8, Tomas Lämås9, Jörg Brunet2, Christer Kalén10, Bengt Kriström11, Pelle Gemmel2, Thomas Ranius4.
Abstract
The multi-scale approach to conserving forest biodiversity has been used in Sweden since the 1980s, a period defined by increased reserve area and conservation actions within production forests. However, two thousand forest-associated species remain on Sweden's red-list, and Sweden's 2020 goals for sustainable forests are not being met. We argue that ongoing changes in the production forest matrix require more consideration, and that multi-scale conservation must be adapted to, and integrated with, production forest development. To make this case, we summarize trends in habitat provision by Sweden's protected and production forests, and the variety of ways silviculture can affect biodiversity. We discuss how different forestry trajectories affect the type and extent of conservation approaches needed to secure biodiversity, and suggest leverage points for aiding the adoption of diversified silviculture. Sweden's long-term experience with multi-scale conservation and intensive forestry provides insights for other countries trying to conserve species within production landscapes.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiversity conservation; Climate change mitigation; Even-aged forestry; Green-tree retention; Habitat loss; Protected areas
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31529355 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01248-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ambio ISSN: 0044-7447 Impact factor: 5.129