Literature DB >> 31529123

A regression framework to uncover pleiotropy in large-scale electronic health record data.

Ruowang Li1,2, Rui Duan2, Rachel L Kember3,4,5, Daniel J Rader3,6, Scott M Damrauer4,7, Jason H Moore1,2, Yong Chen1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pleiotropy, where 1 genetic locus affects multiple phenotypes, can offer significant insights in understanding the complex genotype-phenotype relationship. Although individual genotype-phenotype associations have been thoroughly explored, seemingly unrelated phenotypes can be connected genetically through common pleiotropic loci or genes. However, current analyses of pleiotropy have been challenged by both methodologic limitations and a lack of available suitable data sources.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we propose to utilize a new regression framework, reduced rank regression, to simultaneously analyze multiple phenotypes and genotypes to detect pleiotropic effects. We used a large-scale biobank linked electronic health record data from the Penn Medicine BioBank to select 5 cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, cardiac dysrhythmias, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and heart valve disorders) and 5 mental disorders (mood disorders; anxiety, phobic and dissociative disorders; alcohol-related disorders; neurological disorders; and delirium dementia) to validate our framework.
RESULTS: Compared with existing methods, reduced rank regression showed a higher power to distinguish known associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms from random single-nucleotide polymorphisms. In addition, genome-wide gene-based investigation of pleiotropy showed that reduced rank regression was able to identify candidate genetic variants with novel pleiotropic effects compared to existing methods.
CONCLUSION: The proposed regression framework offers a new approach to account for the phenotype and genotype correlations when identifying pleiotropic effects. By jointly modeling multiple phenotypes and genotypes together, the method has the potential to distinguish confounding from causal genotype and phenotype associations.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; electronic health record; mental disorder; pleiotropy; reduced rank regression

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31529123      PMCID: PMC6748812          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  28 in total

1.  The human genome browser at UCSC.

Authors:  W James Kent; Charles W Sugnet; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Tom H Pringle; Alan M Zahler; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Heritability in the genomics era--concepts and misconceptions.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; William G Hill; Naomi R Wray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability.

Authors:  Brendan Maher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Using electronic health records to drive discovery in disease genomics.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Pingault; Paul F O'Reilly; Tabea Schoeler; George B Ploubidis; Frühling Rijsdijk; Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Quality control procedures for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Stephen Turner; Loren L Armstrong; Yuki Bradford; Christopher S Carlson; Dana C Crawford; Andrew T Crenshaw; Mariza de Andrade; Kimberly F Doheny; Jonathan L Haines; Geoffrey Hayes; Gail Jarvik; Lan Jiang; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rongling Li; Hua Ling; Teri A Manolio; Martha Matsumoto; Catherine A McCarty; Andrew N McDavid; Daniel B Mirel; Justin E Paschall; Elizabeth W Pugh; Luke V Rasmussen; Russell A Wilke; Rebecca L Zuvich; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2011-01

7.  PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Marylyn D Ritchie; Melissa A Basford; Jill M Pulley; Lisa Bastarache; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Deede Wang; Dan R Masys; Dan M Roden; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Sequential Co-Sparse Factor Regression.

Authors:  Aditya Mishra; Dipak K Dey; Kun Chen
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.302

Review 9.  10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Naomi R Wray; Qian Zhang; Pamela Sklar; Mark I McCarthy; Matthew A Brown; Jian Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog).

Authors:  Jacqueline MacArthur; Emily Bowler; Maria Cerezo; Laurent Gil; Peggy Hall; Emma Hastings; Heather Junkins; Aoife McMahon; Annalisa Milano; Joannella Morales; Zoe May Pendlington; Danielle Welter; Tony Burdett; Lucia Hindorff; Paul Flicek; Fiona Cunningham; Helen Parkinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gene-based association tests using GWAS summary statistics and incorporating eQTL.

Authors:  Xuewei Cao; Xuexia Wang; Shuanglin Zhang; Qiuying Sha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.