Literature DB >> 31528828

New Insights Into Pheochromocytoma Surveillance of Young Patients With VHL Missense Mutations.

Gustavo F C Fagundes1, Janaina Petenuci1, Delmar M Lourenco2,3, Ericka B Trarbach2, Maria Adelaide A Pereira4, Joya Emilie Correa D'Eur2, Ana O Hoff3, Antonio M Lerario1, Maria Claudia N Zerbini5, Sheila Siqueira5, Fernando Yamauchi6, Victor Srougi7, Fabio Y Tanno7, Jose Luis Chambo7, Ana Claudia Latronico1, Berenice B Mendonca1, Maria Candida B V Fragoso1,3, Madson Q Almeida1,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by germline mutations in the VHL gene. Guidelines recommend pheochromocytoma (PHEO) biochemical screening should start at age 5 years.
OBJECTIVE: Genotype-phenotype correlations in VHL, focusing on PHEO penetrance in children, were studied.
DESIGN: We retrospectively evaluated 31 individuals (median age at diagnosis was 26 years) with diagnosed VHL disease.
RESULTS: PHEO was diagnosed in six children with VHL. A large PHEO (5 cm) was detected in a 4-year-old boy with p.Gly114Ser mutation. PHEO penetrance was 55% starting at age 4 years. VHL missense mutations were identified in 11 of 22 families (50%), frameshift mutations in four (18.2%), stop codon in three (13.6%), splicing site in two (9.1%), and large gene deletion in two (9.1%). The codon 167 (n = 10) was a hotspot for VHL mutations and was significantly associated with PHEO (90% vs. 38%; P = 0.007). PHEOs and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) were strongly associated with VHL missense mutations compared with other mutations (89.5% vs. 0% and 73.7% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.0001 and 0.002, respectively). In contrast, pancreatic cysts (91.7% vs. 26.3%; P = 0.0001), renal cysts (66.7% vs. 26.3%; P = 0.027), and central nervous system hemangioblastomas (91.7% vs. 47.3%; P = 0.012) were more frequent in VHL with nonmissense mutations.
CONCLUSION: VHL missense mutations were highly associated with PHEO and PNETs. Our data support that in children with VHL harboring missense mutations, biochemical screening for PHEO should be initiated at diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; pheochromocytoma; surveillance; von Hippel-Lindau

Year:  2019        PMID: 31528828      PMCID: PMC6735756          DOI: 10.1210/js.2019-00225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocr Soc        ISSN: 2472-1972


Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man no. 193300) is an autosomal dominant, inherited tumor predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in the VHL tumor suppressor gene [1, 2]. Most cases (80%) are inherited from an affected parent and approximately 20% are de novo. More than 500 germline mutations have been identified since the VHL gene was cloned in 1993 [1, 3]. The incidence of VHL is approximately one in 36,000 live births and lifetime penetrance approaches 100% by age 65 years [4]. The VHL tumor spectrum includes central nervous system (CNS) and retinal hemangioblastomas (HBs), renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), renal cysts, pancreatic cysts (PCs) or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), pheochromocytomas (PHEOs), endolymphatic-sac tumors, and papillary cystadenomas of the epididymis or broad ligament [2, 4]. VHL is primarily caused by inactivation of the VHL tumor-suppressor protein, which plays a key role in cellular oxygen sensing by targeting hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [5]. Approximately 95% to 100% of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of VHL have a disease-causing mutation [1, 2]. Elevated levels of HIFs subsequently result in overactivation of the vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and transforming growth factor-α downstream pathways [5, 6]. In addition, VHL tumors differ with respect to the level of HIFα activation required for tumorigenesis and HIF-independent tumor suppressor functions of the VHL tumor-suppressor protein, which can explain the heterogeneity of VHL clinical presentation [7, 8]. VHL diagnosis is established in an individual with a single characteristic VHL-related tumor (i.e., CNS, HB, RCC, or PHEO tumor) and a family history of VHL. In the absence of a VHL family history, a diagnosis requires two or more typical VHL tumors (excluding epididymal and renal cysts) [2]. VHL diagnosis can also be confirmed if a VHL germline mutation has been identified. VHL genetic diagnosis is also essential for family counseling before disease onset in individuals harboring VHL mutations. Because VHL has marked phenotypic variability, genetic guided surveillance would be essential to decrease morbidity related to VHL-associated tumors [2]. To date, genotype–phenotype correlations in patients with VHL disease mainly rely on predisposition for PHEO development [1, 9, 10]. Type 1 VHL is characterized by truncating or large deletion mutations that confer a low risk for PHEOs, whereas type 2 VHL is characterized by missense mutations and an increased risk for PHEOs. In addition, PNETs are more often diagnosed in patients with VHL disease with exon 3 intragenic mutations, compared with patients with VHL disease with large deletions [10-12]. In this study, we investigated genotype–phenotype correlations in patients with VHL disease from a single tertiary referral hospital. In addition, we analyzed a subgroup of young patients with PHEOs to investigate penetrance and clinical presentation and revisit the optimal age at which to initiate screening.

1. Patient and Methods

The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, and informed written consent was obtained from all patients. Thirty-one patients with molecular diagnosis of VHL from 22 unrelated families were retrospectively evaluated until February 2019. After clinical and/or molecular diagnosis, clinical and imaging follow-up was performed according the surveillance guideline proposed by Nielsen et al. [2]. In summary, patients underwent eye/retinal examination with an ophthalmoscope (since diagnosis) and measurement of levels of plasma-free metanephrines or 24-hour urinary metanephrines annually (after 5 years). MRI of the brain and whole spine was performed every 1 or 2 years after 16 years of age. But differently from what suggested by surveillance guidelines [2, 9], we started to perform abdominal MRI or CT scans after 10 years from diagnosis, every 1 or 2 years, even in asymptomatic individuals. Before 10 years, abdominal imaging was performed only if there were biochemical abnormalities. Pancreatic lesions were classified as cystic or neuroendocrine tumor according to radiological findings. Biochemical and imaging diagnosis of PHEO or paraganglioma followed the Endocrine Society guideline recommendations [13]. Malignant PNET or PHEO was defined only in the presence of local invasion or lymph nodal or distant metastases.

A. Molecular Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted using standard procedures. All VHL coding regions were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. PCR products were sequenced in an automated ABI Prism 3700 sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The following oligonucleotides were used: exons 1, forward 5′-CTAGCCTCGCCTCCGTTAC-3′ and reverse 5′-GTCACCCTGGATGTGTCCTG-3′; exon 2, forward 5′-TTAGCCAGGACGGTCTTGAT-3′ and reverse 5′- CGTACAAATACATCACTTCCATT -3′; and exon 3, forward 5′-TACTACAGAGGCATGAACACC-3′ and reverse 5′- CCCCTAAACATCACAATGC -3′. In the patients with clinical VHL diagnosis but without pathogenic coding variants detected by Sanger, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was performed to investigate large deletions. MLPA was performed as previously described using the SALSA® MLPA® P016 VHL probe mix (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands) [14]. This probe mix contains 29 probes with amplification products between 166 and 427 nucleotides: nine probes for the VHL gene (two or more probes for each exon); six probes for genes located close to VHL (FANCD2, BRK1/C3orf10/HSPC300, IRAK2, and GHRL); and 12 reference probes detecting sequences on other chromosomes. PCR product underwent capillary electrophoresis on an ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Data analysis was performed with Genescan 3.7 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Dosage quotient areas outside the range of 0.70 to 1.3 were considered abnormal.

B. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version (25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Continuous data are expressed as median (range) values. The χ2 test was used to investigate dichotomous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

2. Results

Among the 31 individuals with molecular diagnosis of VHL, median age at diagnosis was 26 (range, 5 to 56) years. The median follow-up was 80.6 (2 to 286) months. In our cohort, CNS HB was the most common tumor, followed by PHEO and pancreatic lesions (Table 1). Two patients died as a result of postoperative complications of neurosurgery for HBs (patients 6 and 15; Table 2).
Table 1.

Tumor Spectrum of 31 Patients With VHL Disease

TumorFrequency, No. (%)
CNS HB20 (64.5)
PHEO17 (54.8)
PNET16 (51.6)
PC16 (51.6)
Renal cyst13 (41.9)
Retinal HB12 (38.7)
RCC8 (25.8)
Table 2.

Molecular and Clinical Data of Individuals With VHL Disease.

FamilyAge (y)PPGLAge at PPGL DiagnosisPNETAge at PNET DiagnosisRCCRCPCCNS HBRetinal HBMutation (cDNA)RegionMutation (Protein)Type of Mutation
1138Y38Y38NNNNNc.340G>AExon 1p.Gly114SerMissense
214Y4Y20NNNYNC.340G.AExon 1p.Gly114SerMissense
3126Y26Y26NYNYYC.340G.AExon 1p.Gly114SerMissense
428Y8Y14NNNNNc.340G>AExon 1p.Gly114SerMissense
5330Y33Y49YNYYYc.499C>TExon 3p.Arg167TrpMissense
6418Y18Y44NNNYNc.500G>AExon 3p.Arg167GlnMissense
7420NNYNNNNc.500G>AExon 3p.Arg167GlnMissense
8427Y27NNNNYNc.500G>AExon 3p.Arg167GlnMissense
9449Y49NNYYYNc.500G>AExon 3p.Arg167GlnMissense
10412Y12Y13NNNNNc.500G>AExon 3p.Arg167GlnMissense
11526Y26Y26NNNNNc.499C>TExon 3p.Arg167TrpMissense
12636Y36Y36NYYNYc.499C>TExon 3p.Arg167TrpMissense
13616Y16NNNNNNc.499C>TExon 3p.Arg167TrpMissense
14729Y29Y29NNNNNc.374A>CExon 2p.His125ProMissense
15832Y33Y33YYYYNc.233A>GExon 1p.Asn78SerMissense
16914NNNNNYYc.540delCExon 3p.180fs*22Frameshift
171044NNYNYYYc.227_229delTCTExon 1p.Phe76delFrameshift
181115NNNYYYYc.309_322del14aExon 1p.G104fs*231Frameshift
191253NNYYYYNExon 1Large deletion
201324NY24NYYYYc.541delGExon 3p.V181S fs*21Frameshift
211436NNYNYYNc.486C>AExon 3p.Cys162*Stop codon
221519NNNNYYNc.481C>TExon 3p.Arg161*Stop Codon
231616NY17NNYYYc.74C>Tb; 256C>AExon 1p.Pro25Leu /p.Pro86ThrMissense
241731NNNYYNYc.463+2T>GIntron 2Splicing site
251826Y26Y35NNNYNc.499C>TExon 3p.Arg167TrpMissense
261913Y13Y47NYNNYc.371C>TExon 2p.Thr124IleMissense
271910Y10NNNNNNc.371C>TExon 2p.Thr124IleMissense
282045NNNYYYNc.463+1G>AIntron 2Splicing site
292114NY25NYYYYAll exonsLarge deletion
302256NNYYYYYc.481 C>TExon 3p.Arg161*Stop Codon
312232NNYYYYNc.481 C>TExon 3p.Arg161*Stop Codon

Abbreviations: —, case did not develop the tumor; PPGL, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Mutation previously described only as a somatic event in RCC (15).

The mutation c.74C>T has been reported as likely being in ClinVar (ClinVar accession number VCV000093330.1).

Tumor Spectrum of 31 Patients With VHL Disease Molecular and Clinical Data of Individuals With VHL Disease. Abbreviations: —, case did not develop the tumor; PPGL, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Mutation previously described only as a somatic event in RCC (15). The mutation c.74C>T has been reported as likely being in ClinVar (ClinVar accession number VCV000093330.1). Median age at diagnosis of PHEO was 26 (5 to 49) years. All PHEOs were noradrenergic. The median size was 3.5 (0.8 to 6.8) cm. Ten of 17 PHEOs (59%) were bilateral. Six of the 10 bilateral PHEOs were synchronous. A para-aortic abdominal paraganglioma (2.2 cm) was diagnosed in a young patient with bilateral PHEO (patient 10;, Table 2). PHEO penetrance was 55%, starting at 4 years of age (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Cumulative frequency of (A) PHEOs and (B) PNETS in patients with VHL disease (n = 31).

Cumulative frequency of (A) PHEOs and (B) PNETS in patients with VHL disease (n = 31). Six of 16 patients (37.5%) with VHL disease with PHEO were younger than 19 (4 to 16) years, and tumor size (largest PHEO) varied from 1.3 to 6.0 cm (Table 3). Five of the six patients with VHL disease (83.3%) had bilateral PHEOs, but only one case was synchronous. We report here the interesting case of a 4-year-old boy with VHL disease with a history of sudoresis, headache, and abdominal pain (case 2; Table 2). During evaluation, he was diagnosed with hypertension. An abdominal CT scan revealed a 5-cm heterogenous mass in the right adrenal and normal left adrenal glands. This patient underwent a right nodulectomy to preserve normal adrenal tissue. Anatomopathological diagnosis confirmed PHEO. After 3 years, a bilateral recurrence was evidenced (4-cm right and 1.5-cm left nodules). The patient underwent a right-side adrenalectomy and a left-side nodulectomy. He remained without hormone replacement. After 13 years from the second surgery, the boy presented with a left-side recurrence (1.3-cm nodule) and elevated plasmatic normetanephrine levels; he underwent left-side adrenalectomy. He is currently receiving hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone therapy.
Table 3.

Characteristics of PHEO and Paraganglioma in Patients Younger Than Age 19 Years With VHL Disease

Family/Case No.Age at Diagnosis (y)Sex (F/M)PHEOa (cm) (Right or Left Side)Bilateral (Y/N)Synchronous (Y/N)Contralateral PHEOa (cm) (Right or Left Side)Paragangliomaa (cm)Time Until Recurrence (mo)
1/24M5.0 (R)YN4.0 (R), 1.5 (L)36
1.3 (L)156
2/48F6.0 (L)YN5.5 (R)24
4/1012M5.5 (R)YY1.5 (L)2.2
6/1316M1.7 (R)NNNo recurrence (follow-up, 83 mo)
19/2613MNAYNNA48
19/2710MNAYNNA48

Abbreviations: —, case did not develop the tumor; NA, not available.

Largest diameter.

Characteristics of PHEO and Paraganglioma in Patients Younger Than Age 19 Years With VHL Disease Abbreviations: —, case did not develop the tumor; NA, not available. Largest diameter. PNETs and PCs were both identified in 16 of 31 (51.6%) patients. The median age at diagnosis was 29 (13 to 49) years. Median size of PNETs was 1.75 (0.7 to 9.6) cm. All PCs were multiple, whereas seven of 16 PNETs (43.8%) were multiple. PNET penetrance was 52%, starting at 13 years of age (Fig. 1). Two PNETs were malignant: one in a patient with lymph node and hepatic metastases (patient 11; Table 2) and another in a patient with local duodenal invasion (patient 12; Table 2). The sizes of the malignant PNETs were 4.0 and 9.6 cm, respectively. Among the 16 patients with VHL disease who had PNETs, three (18.8%) were younger than 19 (13 to 17) years; tumor size in this group varied from 0.7 to 2.2 cm (Table 4). Two of them had multiple PNETs and only one had a PC. Two of the three young patients with PNETs had missense VHL mutations. Only the patient with a concomitant PC had a frameshift VHL mutation in exon 3 (case 16; Table 2).
Table 4.

Characteristics of Nonfunctioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Lesions in Patients Younger than Age 19 Years With VHL Disease

Family/Case No.Age at Diagnosis (y)Sex (F/M)PNET Sizea (cm)Multiple (Y/N)Pancreatic Cysts (Y/N)
2/414F1.5YN
4/913M0.7NN
23/1617F2.2NY

Largest diameter of largest nodule.

Characteristics of Nonfunctioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Lesions in Patients Younger than Age 19 Years With VHL Disease Largest diameter of largest nodule. VHL missense mutations were identified in 11 of 22 families (50%), frameshift mutations in four (18.2%), stop codon in three (13.6%), splicing site in two (9.1%), and large gene deletion in two (9.1%; Table 2). Codon 167 was a hotspot for VHL mutations, identified in 10 cases from 5 of 22 kindreds (22.7%). Codon 167 mutations were significantly associated with a higher risk of developing PHEO (90% vs. 38%; P = 0.007; χ2= 7.37). Among those 10 patients with codon 167 mutations, PNETs developed in six, CNS HBs in five, PCs in three, and RCCs in two. Among the 22 families, intragenic VHL mutations (81.8%) were located in exon 1 (six families; 27.3%), exon 2 (two families; 22, 9.1%), and exon 3 (10 families; 45.5%). Large VHL deletions (two families; 9.1%) and splicing sites (two families; 9,1%) were less frequent among the 22 families. All mutations but one have been previously reported in VHL disease. The germline VHL frameshift mutation c.309_322del14 (p.G104fs*23), leading to a premature stop codon, was previously described as a somatic event in RCCs in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Two large VHL deletions were identified in two families of patients with VHL disease: an exon 1 and a complete VHL deletion (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

MLPA showing heterozygous VHL large deletions in two patients with VHL type 1 disease: (A) exon 1 deletion and (B) complete gene deletion.

MLPA showing heterozygous VHL large deletions in two patients with VHL type 1 disease: (A) exon 1 deletion and (B) complete gene deletion. VHL missense mutations were highly associated with PHEO when compared with other mutations (89.5% vs. 0%; P = 0.0001; χ2= 23.54; Table 5). In addition, PNETs were significantly more frequent in patients with VHL disease with missense mutations when compared with nonmissense defects (73.7% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.002; χ2= 9.57). In contrast, PCs (91.7% vs. 26.3%; P = 0.0001; χ= 12,58), renal cysts (66.7% vs. 26.3%; P = 0.027; χ= 4.92), and CNS HBs (91.7% vs. 47.3%; P = 0.027; χ= 6.30) were more frequent in patients with nonmissense variants (truncating or large deletion) when compared with missense mutations (Table 5).
Table 5.

Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in Individuals With VHL Disease

Missense (n = 19), No. (%)Nonmissense (n = 12), No. (%) P (χ 2 test)
PHEO17 (89.5)0 (0)0.0001 (23.74)
RCC3 (15.7)5 (41.7)0.11 (2.57)
Renal cysts5 (26.3)8 (66.7)0.027 (4.92)
PNET14 (73.7)2 (16.7)0.002 (9.57)
PC5 (26.3)11 (91.7)0.0001 (12.58)
CNS HB9 (47.3)11 (91.7)0.012 (6.3)
Retinal HB5 (26.3)7 (58.3)0.075 (3.18)
Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in Individuals With VHL Disease

3. Discussion

In this study, we analyzed a large cohort of Brazilian patients with VHL disease and investigated genotype–phenotype correlations. We found that missense mutations conferred an increased risk of PHEO and PNET development but a decreased risk of CNS HBs, PCs, and renal cysts. In our cohort, the majority of VHL mutations detected were missense, as previously described [16, 17]. Our study confirmed previous associations between VHL tumors and genotype but also expanded the genotype–phenotype correlation in this disease. These findings underscore the clinical utility in tailoring a personalized approach in the follow-up of patients with VHL disease according mutational status. We also reported here a 5-cm PHEO in a 4-year-old boy with VHL harboring the p.Gly114Ser mutation. Two cases of PHEO before 5 years of age in VHL were previously reported [18, 19]. In both cases, patients carried VHL missense mutations (Val84Leu and Gln164Arg) [18, 19]. In 2015, Aufforth et al. [20] reported 21 pediatric patients with VHL disease (age <19 years) with PHEO and the earliest age at diagnosis was 5.5 years, suggesting that biochemical screening (i.e., annual measurement of plasma metanephrine levels) for PHEO should start at age 5 years in patients with VHL disease. Indeed, VHL surveillance guidelines recommend starting PHEO screening only after 5 years of age [2, 9]. Data from the Dutch VHL surveillance suggest surveillance for PHEO should be initiated at birth [21]. Similarly, we think PHEO surveillance should initiate before 5 years of age, but only in children with VHL missense mutations and by measuring annually plasma metanephrine levels, without imaging. Although PHEOs in VHL disease are rarely malignant, starting annual screening of plasma metanephrine levels before 5 years of age only in a subset of children with VHL disease (those harboring VHL missense mutations) is cost-effective and will allow an earlier diagnosis of a tumor associated with hypertension and increased cardiovascular morbidity. Although PHEO size has not been reported in the two previously reported patients with VHL disease who were younger than 5 years, both children had night sweats, headache, severe hypertension, and weight loss at diagnosis [18, 19]. Codon 167 was a hotspot for VHL mutations in our cohort. Mutations in this codon represent approximately 43% of mutations in American and Canadian families with type 2 VHL disease [15, 22, 23]. Codon 167 mutations have been associated with an increased risk of PHEO, PNET and RCC development [10, 23]. In our study, codon 167 mutations were associated only with PHEO diagnosis. Recently, Peng et al. [17] demonstrated a strong association between codon 167 mutations and PHEO development in VHL disease, but also a lower risk of CNS HBs, RCCs, and pancreatic lesions (PNETs and cysts were analyzed together). The frequency of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (mostly PHEOs) in patients with VHL disease has been estimated at approximately 10% to 25% [2]. The higher frequency of PHEOs in our cohort was probably due to a referral bias to our Endocrinology Division. In our cohort, patients with VHL disease with PHEO had a higher frequency of bilateral adrenal involvement, low risk of paraganglioma and malignant disease, and early age at diagnosis. In addition, PHEOs were highly associated with missense mutations, as previously reported [1, 9, 10]. Although relevant and from a single center, our study has limitations because of its retrospectively design and rarity of VHL disease. Genotype–phenotype correlation of PNET in patients with VHL disease is not well established as PHEOs. Here, we demonstrated a higher frequency of PNETs in patients with VHL disease with missense mutations (VHL type 2). In addition, we report three PNETs (one was 2.2 cm) in VHL disease before 19 years of age. Similarly, Igarashi et al. [24] demonstrated that VHL type 2 disease was significantly more related to PNET than VHL type 1 disease. More recently, Krauss et al. [10] showed that PNETs occurred significantly more frequently in patients with VHL disease with intragenic mutations compared with large deletions. In addition, PNETs in VHL disease were significantly associated with mutations affecting exon 3 with hotspots in codons 161 and 167 [10]. In contrast to PNETs, PCs were detected more frequently in patients with VHL disease harboring nonmissense mutations in our cohort. Recently, Vikkath et al. [25] reported a preferential involvement of PCs in exon 1 mutations in 15 Indian families. In our study, frequency of PCs was not associated with exon mutations. PNET prognosis in VHL disease has been demonstrated to be better than in sporadic cases [11, 26]. PNETs in VHL disease are diagnosed earlier and more often are benign and multiple [26]. PNETs <15 mm usually do not progress and a size >3 cm is a risk factor for malignancy [11, 26]. Recently, a 2.8-cm tumor was demonstrated to represent a better cutoff to predict malignant PNET [10]. Besides size, exon 3 mutations (mostly those in codon 161 and 167) have been also associated with an increased risk of malignancy in PNETs of patients with VHL disease [10, 12, 27]. In our cohort, the two cases of malignant PNETs in VHL disease carried the missense mutation p.Arg167Trp at codon 167 in exon 3. Early age at onset, truncating VHL mutations, and CNS HB as the first presenting tumor were related to a decreased survival in a Chinese cohort of patients with VHL disease [17]. CNS HBs were associated with nonmissense VHL mutations in our study when compared with missense mutations, as previously reported [2, 17]. Two patients in our cohort died as a result of surgical complications of CNS HBs. In conclusion, VHL missense mutations were highly associated with PHEOs, whereas CNS HBs were more often diagnosed in patients with VHL truncating mutations, as previously described. Interestingly, PNETs were significantly more associated with VHL missense mutations in our cohort. Therefore, patients with VHL missense mutations should be closely monitored for PNET development, particularly those with exon 3 missense mutations who carry a higher risk of malignancy. In addition, our data support that biochemical screening for PHEO should be initiated at birth for patients with VHL disease harboring missense mutations.
  27 in total

1.  The von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) germline mutation V84L manifests as early-onset bilateral pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Mary-Alice Abbott; Katherine L Nathanson; Simon Nightingale; Eamonn R Maher; Robert M Greenstein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Pheochromocytoma in a 2.75-year-old-girl with a germline von Hippel-Lindau mutation Q164R.

Authors:  Petra Sovinz; Christian Urban; Sabine Uhrig; Vinzenz Stepan; Herwig Lackner; Wolfgang Schwinger; Martin Benesch; Andrea Moser; Ekkehard Spuller; Michael R Speicher
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Genetic analysis of von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  Morgan Nordstrom-O'Brien; Rob B van der Luijt; Ellen van Rooijen; Ans M van den Ouweland; Danielle F Majoor-Krakauer; Martijn P Lolkema; Aram van Brussel; Emile E Voest; Rachel H Giles
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Contrasting effects on HIF-1alpha regulation by disease-causing pVHL mutations correlate with patterns of tumourigenesis in von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  S C Clifford; M E Cockman; A C Smallwood; D R Mole; E R Woodward; P H Maxwell; P J Ratcliffe; E R Maher
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Systematic comparison of sporadic and syndromic pancreatic islet cell tumors.

Authors:  Zoran Erlic; Ursula Ploeckinger; Alberto Cascon; Michael M Hoffmann; Laura von Duecker; Aurelia Winter; Gerit Kammel; Janina Bacher; Maren Sullivan; Berend Isermann; Lars Fischer; Andreas Raffel; Wolfram Trudo Knoefel; Matthias Schott; Tobias Baumann; Oliver Schaefer; Tobias Keck; Richard P Baum; Ioana Milos; Mihaela Muresan; Mariola Peczkowska; Andrzej Januszewicz; Kenko Cupisti; Anke Tönjes; Mathias Fasshauer; Jan Langrehr; Peter von Wussow; Abbas Agaimy; Günter Schlimok; Regina Lamberts; Thorsten Wiech; Kurt Werner Schmid; Alexander Weber; Mercedes Nunez; Mercedes Robledo; Charis Eng; Hartmut P H Neumann
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 5.678

6.  Clinical, genetic and radiographic analysis of 108 patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) manifested by pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNETs).

Authors:  Joseph A Blansfield; Lynda Choyke; Shane Y Morita; Peter L Choyke; James F Pingpank; H Richard Alexander; Geoffrey Seidel; Yvonne Shutack; Nargiza Yuldasheva; Michelle Eugeni; David L Bartlett; Gladys M Glenn; Lindsay Middelton; W Marston Linehan; Steven K Libutti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  The von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein: O2 sensing and cancer.

Authors:  William G Kaelin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Deletions of NF1 gene and exons detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  A De Luca; I Bottillo; M C Dasdia; A Morella; V Lanari; L Bernardini; L Divona; S Giustini; L Sinibaldi; A Novelli; I Torrente; A Schirinzi; B Dallapiccola
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 9.  Two sides to every story: the HIF-dependent and HIF-independent functions of pVHL.

Authors:  Mingqing Li; William Y Kim
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes.

Authors:  Gillian L Dalgliesh; Kyle Furge; Chris Greenman; Lina Chen; Graham Bignell; Adam Butler; Helen Davies; Sarah Edkins; Claire Hardy; Calli Latimer; Jon Teague; Jenny Andrews; Syd Barthorpe; Dave Beare; Gemma Buck; Peter J Campbell; Simon Forbes; Mingming Jia; David Jones; Henry Knott; Chai Yin Kok; King Wai Lau; Catherine Leroy; Meng-Lay Lin; David J McBride; Mark Maddison; Simon Maguire; Kirsten McLay; Andrew Menzies; Tatiana Mironenko; Lee Mulderrig; Laura Mudie; Sarah O'Meara; Erin Pleasance; Arjunan Rajasingham; Rebecca Shepherd; Raffaella Smith; Lucy Stebbings; Philip Stephens; Gurpreet Tang; Patrick S Tarpey; Kelly Turrell; Karl J Dykema; Sok Kean Khoo; David Petillo; Bill Wondergem; John Anema; Richard J Kahnoski; Bin Tean Teh; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Large scale genotype- and phenotype-driven machine learning in Von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  Andreea Chiorean; Kirsten M Farncombe; Sean Delong; Veronica Andric; Safa Ansar; Clarissa Chan; Kaitlin Clark; Arpad M Danos; Yizhuo Gao; Rachel H Giles; Anna Goldenberg; Payal Jani; Kilannin Krysiak; Lynzey Kujan; Samantha Macpherson; Eamonn R Maher; Liam G McCoy; Yasser Salama; Jason Saliba; Lana Sheta; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith; Lauren Erdman; Arun Ramani; Raymond H Kim
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.700

Review 2.  Phakomatoses and Endocrine Gland Tumors: Noteworthy and (Not so) Rare Associations.

Authors:  Benjamin Chevalier; Hippolyte Dupuis; Arnaud Jannin; Madleen Lemaitre; Christine Do Cao; Catherine Cardot-Bauters; Stéphanie Espiard; Marie Christine Vantyghem
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 3.  Von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Current Challenges and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Sven Gläsker; Evelynn Vergauwen; Christian A Koch; Alexander Kutikov; Alexander O Vortmeyer
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Perioperative Management of Pheochromocytomas and Sympathetic Paragangliomas.

Authors:  Gustavo F C Fagundes; Madson Q Almeida
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 5.  Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease: not a needle in a haystack.

Authors:  João Castro-Teles; Bernardo Sousa-Pinto; Sandra Rebelo; Duarte Pignatelli
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.335

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.