| Literature DB >> 31528782 |
Sanjay Gairola1, Hatem A Shabana1, Tamer Mahmoud1, Ali El-Keblawy2, Andrea Santo3.
Abstract
Ex situ conservation in seed banks is a potential complementary conservation strategy for native plant species. It is well established that ex situ seed banking of native wild plants prolongs seed viability and thereby preserves genetic and species diversity for future use. We evaluated ex situ storage potential of eight halophytic species from deserts in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) by studying seed germination. Specifically, we examined the germinability of freshly collected seeds and seeds stored for three years in a seed bank. We also examined the effect of light conditions on fresh and stored seed germination. Fresh seeds of seven of the eight species tested had a higher germination rates under 12/12 h light/dark fluctuations than did those exposed to total darkness. Storage reduced light sensitivity in Halocnemum strobilaceum, Suaeda aegyptiaca, Salsola drummondii and Salsola imbricata, but increased the requirement for light in Arthrocnemum macrostachyum. In Anabasis setifera, storage decreased germination percentage when there was a 12-hour light/dark fluctuation, but increased germination rate when exposed to the dark treatment. Storage significantly reduced germination in both the light/dark and dark treatments in Suaeda vermiculata and S. aegyptiaca. Germination speed also responded differently to storage; whereas Timson's index significantly increased in A. macrostachyum and H. strobilaceum, it significantly decreased for S. drummondii, S. aegyptiaca and S. vermiculata. Germination of these species at a range of temperatures requires further testing; additionally, we strongly suggest that these laboratory findings be complemented by field studies.Entities:
Keywords: Ex situ conservation; Halophytes; SSBH; Salt tolerance; Seed bank collection; Seed germination
Year: 2019 PMID: 31528782 PMCID: PMC6742497 DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2019.07.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Divers ISSN: 2468-2659
Seed collection information, seed weight, dispersal ability and relative light germination index (RLG) for species used in this study. Seed weight is the average five replicates ± SE, each comprising 100 seeds.
| Species | Code | Habitat | Life span | 100 seed weight (mg ± SE) | RLG | Seed dispersal ability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | Stored | ||||||
| Anab. seti. | Coastal saline plain | Perennial | 17.47 ± 6.51 | 0.67 | 0.36 | Long distance | |
| Arth. macr. | Coastal salt marshes | Perennial | 13.07 ± 1.65 | 0.50 | 0.61 | Limited dispersal | |
| Halo. stro. | Coastal salt marshes | Perennial | 15.26 ± 6.16 | 0.55 | 0.53 | Limited dispersal | |
| Halo. perf. | Coastal salt marshes | Perennial | 10.26 ± 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.63 | Limited dispersal | |
| Sals. drum. | Saline sandy plain | Perennial | 50.30 ± 8.05 | 0.62 | 0.56 | Long distance | |
| Sals. imbr. | Saline sandy area | Perennial | 46.31 ± 2.37 | 0.65 | 0.69 | Long distance | |
| Suae. aegy. | Saline sandy area | Annual/Biennal | 19.24 ± 1.97 | 0.64 | 0.67 | Limited dispersal | |
| Suae. verm. | Coastal saline plain | Perennial | 23.91 ± 2.78 | 0.57 | 0.54 | Limited dispersal | |
Effect of species, photoperiod, storage and their interactions on final germination of the eight halophytes. ns: non-significant; **: P < 0.01 and ***: P < 0.001.
| Source of variation | Sum of Squares | Degree of Freedom | Mean Squares | F-value | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species (Sp) | 23244.8 | 7 | 3320.7 | 33.46 | *** |
| Photoperiod (Ph) | 7148.3 | 1 | 7148.3 | 72.02 | *** |
| Storage (St) | 1456.6 | 1 | 1456.6 | 14.68 | *** |
| Sp × Ph | 2982.3 | 7 | 426.0 | 4.29 | *** |
| Sp × St | 4524.3 | 7 | 646.3 | 6.51 | *** |
| Ph × St | 153.9 | 1 | 153.9 | 1.55 | ns |
| Sp × Ph × St | 2158.9 | 7 | 308.4 | 3.11 | ** |
| Error | 6352.4 | 64 | 99.3 |
Fig. 1Effects of photoperiod, species type and storage on seed germination of eight halophytes. Bars with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 (Fisher's Least Significant Difference). Values are means ± SD of three replicates.
Effects of photoperiod, storage and their interaction on final germination of eight halophytes. ns: non-significant; *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01 and ***: P < 0.001.
| Species | Photoperiod (Ph) | Storage (St) | Ph × St |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | ** | ** | |
| ns | ns | ns | |
| *** | ns | ns | |
| *** | ns | ns | |
| ns | ns | ns | |
| *** | ns | ns | |
| * | *** | ns | |
| ns | *** | ns |
Timson's index values (TI) and time for first germination (T1, in days) for fresh and stored seeds of the eight halophytes. ns: non-significant; *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01 and ***: P < 0.001.
| Species | Germination velocity | Fresh | Stored | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TI | 56.6 ± 3.1 | 96.7 ± 1.7 | *** | |
| T1 (days) | 1.00 ± 1.00 | 1.00 ± 1.00 | ns | |
| TI | 60.8 ± 2.1 | 92.2 ± 0.1 | *** | |
| T1 (days) | 1.33 ± 0.57 | 1.00 ± 1.00 | ns | |
| TI | 92.7 ± 2.9 | 90.0 ± 0.0 | ns | |
| T1 (days) | 1.00 ± 0 | 2.00 ± 0 | * | |
| TI | 83.7 ± 1.1 | 94.6 ± 0.5 | ** | |
| T1 (days) | 1.00 ± 0 | 1.00 ± 0 | ns | |
| TI | 81.3 ± 3.5 | 85.3 ± 4.7 | ns | |
| T1 (days) | 1.00 ± 0 | 1.00 ± 0 | ns | |
| TI | 90.0 ± 1.7 | 86.7 ± 0.4 | ns | |
| T1 (days) | 1.00 ± 0 | 1.00 ± 0 | ns | |
| TI | 88.0 ± 2.4 | 69.7 ± 12.9 | ns | |
| T1 (days) | 1.00 ± 0 | 1.33 ± 0.57 | ns | |
| TI | 86.1 ± 4.7 | 66.5 ± 12.9 | ns | |
| T1 (days) | 1.00 ± 0 | 2.00 ± 1.00 | ns | |