| Literature DB >> 31528044 |
Nedjma Aouane1, Abdelkrim Nasri2, Mohamed Al Amine Bekara3, Ahmed Khireddine Metref4, Rachid Kaidi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The Barb horse occupies a prominent place in the history, culture, and equestrian traditions of the Maghreb (Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia). Although many studies on the breed standard and morphometry have been published, there are no studies on its fertility and reproductive potential. Thus, this work aimed to study the fertility of Barb, Arabian Purebred, and Thoroughbred horses in Algeria.Entities:
Keywords: Barb; age; breed; breeding performance; stallion
Year: 2019 PMID: 31528044 PMCID: PMC6702567 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1132-1139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Results of descriptive analysis of the reproductive performance indicators and characteristics of the stallion (sample n=168).
| Variable | Descriptive indicator | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reproductive performance indicators | ||
| Number of cycles operated (n) | mean (SD) | 9.5 (9.4) |
| Gravid barren mares rate (%) | mean (SD) | 55.7 (42.6) |
| Pregnant foaling mares rate (%) | mean (SD) | 79.5 (29.3) |
| Gravid maiden mares rate (%) | mean (SD) | 79.9 (36.3) |
| Conception rate per cycle (%) | mean (SD) | 66.3 (27.5) |
| Seasonal pregnancy rate (%) | mean (SD) | 74 (29.4) |
| Embryonic mortality rate (%) | n (%) | 10.2 (21.4) |
| Characteristics of the stallion | ||
| Breed | ||
| Barb | n (%) | 44 (26.8) |
| Others | n (%) | 124 (73.8) |
| Age | ||
| <5years | n (%) | 6 (3.5) |
| 5-10years | n (%) | 57 (33.9) |
| >10years | n (%) | 105 (62.5) |
| Year of study | n (%) | |
| 2003 | n (%) | 10 (5.9) |
| 2004 | n (%) | 13 (7.7) |
| 2005 | n (%) | 10 (5.9) |
| 2006 | n (%) | 14 (8.3) |
| 2007 | n (%) | 16 (9.5) |
| 2008 | n (%) | 19 (11.4) |
| 2009 | n (%) | 19 (11.4) |
| 2010 | n (%) | 18 (10.7) |
| 2011 | n (%) | 28 (16.7) |
| 2012 | n (%) | 21 (12.5) |
SD=Standard deviation
Effect of the breed of the stallion on the number of barren mares become pregnant.
| Variable | Category | Gravid barren mares rate (%) mean (SD) | Univariate analysis | Multivariateanalysis (final model) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | |||
| Breedz | Others | 53.1 (45.1) | Reference | 0.03 | Reference | / |
| Barb | 61.6 (36.3) | 1.72 (1.05-2.84) | 1.72 (1.05-2.84) | 0.03 | ||
| Age | <5years | 42.8 (50.8) | Reference | 0.61 | / | / |
| 5-10years | 55.5 (40) | 1.30 (0.37-4.52) | / | / | ||
| >10years | 56.5 (43.8) | 1.59 (0.48-5.27) | / | / | ||
| Year of study | 2003 | 37 (41) | Reference | 0.06 | / | / |
| 2004 | 85.7 (37.8) | 13.92 (2.31-270) | / | / | ||
| 2005 | 42.5 (46) | 1.08 (0.28-4.19) | / | / | ||
| 2006 | 50 (47.1) | 0.74 (0.22-2.46) | / | / | ||
| 2007 | 55.5 (48.6) | 1.39 (0.49-4.03) | / | / | ||
| 2008 | 64.9 (38.4) | 1.77 (0.62-5.15) | / | / | ||
| 2009 | 66 (37.3) | 1.52 (0.56-4.22) | / | / | ||
| 2010 | 53.1 (44.3) | 1.30 (0.43-4) | / | / | ||
| 2011 | 39.9 (44.7) | 0.83 (0.30-2.26) | / | / | ||
| 2012 | 64 (38.3) | 1.65 (0.61-4.56) | / | / | ||
SD=Standard deviation, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval
Influence of the age of the stallion and the year of the study on the number of foaling pregnant mares.
| Variable | Category | Pregnant foaling mares rate (%) mean (SD) | Univariate analysis | Multivariateanalysis (final model) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | |||
| Breed | Others | 77.4 (32.1) | Reference | 0.47 | / | / |
| Barb | 85.4 (18.6) | 1.17 (0.76-1.83) | / | / | ||
| Age | <5years | 76.4 (34.2) | Reference | 0.11 | Reference | / |
| 5-10years | 78.2 (32.7) | 2.75 (0.88-8.04) | 3.26 (1-10.08) | 0.04 | ||
| >10years | 80.3 (27.5) | 3.17 (1.04-9.02) | 3.73 (1.17-11.16) | 0.02 | ||
| Year of study | 2003 | 76.4 (30.8) | Reference | <0.01 | Reference | / |
| 2004 | 89.6 (16.3) | 1.6 (0.53-4.71) | 1.52 (0.53-4.71) | 0.45 | ||
| 2005 | 93.6 (10.8) | 1.8 (0.65-5.13) | 1.77 (0.65-5.13) | 0.27 | ||
| 2006 | 62.1 (35) | 0.29 (0.12-0.61) | 0.28 (0.12-0.61) | <0.01 | ||
| 2007 | 78 (31) | 1.02 (0.27-1.72) | 0.69 (0.27-1.72) | 0.42 | ||
| 2008 | 84 (27.1) | 1.23 (0.44-3.29) | 1.19 (0.44-3.29) | 0.74 | ||
| 2009 | 87.9 (25.7) | 1.42 (0.53-3.87) | 1.4 (0.53-3.87) | 0.5 | ||
| 2010 | 77.3 (27.9) | 0.81 (0.33-1.83) | 0.79 (0.33-1.83) | 0.58 | ||
| 2011 | 72.6 (33.1) | 0.7 (0.33-1.58) | 0.74 (0.33-1.58) | 0.45 | ||
| 2012 | 81.3 (32.7) | 1.34 (0.6-3.38) | 1.44 (0.6-3.38) | 0.4 | ||
SD=Standard deviation, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval
Influence of breed, age of stallion, and year of study on conception rate per cycle.
| Variable | Category | Conception rate per cycle (%) mean (SD) | Univariate analysis | Multivariateanalysis (final model) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | |||
| Breed | Others | 65.7 (30.1) | Reference | <0.01 | Reference | / |
| Barb | 68.3 (18.3) | 1.13 (1.05-1.21) | 0.25 (0.16-0.4) | <0.001 | ||
| Age | <5years | 65.5 (20.3) | Reference | <0.001 | Reference | |
| 5-10years | 70.8 (29.5) | 1.28 (1.07-1.52) | 0.41 (0.26-0.62) | <0.001 | ||
| >10years | 64 (26.6) | 0.93 (0.78-1.11) | 0.3 (0.19-0.45) | <0.001 | ||
| Breed×Age | Barb and 5-10years | 72.3 (19.8) | 6.84 (4.07-10.7) | <0.001 | 4.75 (2.97-7.87) | <0.001 |
| Barb and>10years | 67.9 (17.7) | 7.33 (4.64-11.9) | 5.12 (3.22-8.41) | <0.001 | ||
| Year of study | 2003 | 55.9 (19.6) | Reference | <0.001 | Reference | / |
| 2004 | 70.3 (27.1) | 1.87 (1.56-2.21) | 1.85 (1.56-2.21) | <0.001 | ||
| 2005 | 82.4 (17.2) | 3.69 (2.68-4.06) | 3.3 (2.68-4.06) | <0.001 | ||
| 2006 | 60.8 (35.9) | 1.22 (0.95-1.33) | 1.13 (0.95-1.33) | 0.16 | ||
| 2007 | 64.7 (29.1) | 1.45 (1.19-1.65) | 1.4 (1.19-1.65) | <0.001 | ||
| 2008 | 77.3 (27.1) | 2.69 (2.09-2.92) | 2.47 (2.09-2.92) | <0.001 | ||
| 2009 | 72.7 (25.8) | 2.1 (1.64-2.28) | 1.93 (1.64-2.28) | <0.001 | ||
| 2010 | 57.3 (21.7) | 1.06 (0.83-1.14) | 0.98 (0.83-1.14) | 0.76 | ||
| 2011 | 60.5 (29.5) | 1.21 (0.95-1.29) | 1.11 (0.95-1.29) | 0.18 | ||
| 2012 | 66.2 (27.4) | 1.54 (1.21-1.65) | 1.41 (1.21-1.65) | <0.001 | ||
SD=Standard deviation, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval
Influence of breed, age of stallion, and year of study on seasonal pregnancy rate.
| Variable | Category | Seasonal pregnancy rate (%) mean (SD) | Univariate analysis | Multivariateanalysis (final model) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | |||
| Breed | Others | 73 (31.6) | Reference | <0.001 | Reference | / |
| Barb | 76.9 (22.5) | 1.23 (1.14-1.34) | 1.4 (1.29-1.53) | <0.001 | ||
| Age | <5years | 66 (32) | Reference | <0.001 | Reference | / |
| 5-10years | 75.1 (30.7) | 1.55 (1.30-1.86) | 1.95 (1.61-2.36) | <0.001 | ||
| >10years | 73.8 (28.8) | 1.45 (1.22-1.73) | 1.83 (1.52-2.21) | <0.001 | ||
| Year of study | 2003 | 66.3 (20) | Reference | <0.001 | Reference | / |
| 2004 | 84.9 (23.9) | 2.86 (2.25-3.38) | 2.75 (2.25-3.38) | <0.001 | ||
| 2005 | 88.9 (11.6) | 4.07 (2.91-4.69) | 3.68 (2.91-4.69) | <0.001 | ||
| 2006 | 53.1 (35.5) | 0.57 (0.45-0.63) | 0.53 (0.45-0.63) | <0.001 | ||
| 2007 | 69.4 (33.8) | 1.15 (0.92-1.29) | 1.09 (0.92-1.29) | 0.32 | ||
| 2008 | 84.3 (24.3) | 2.72 (2.26-3.24) | 2.71 (2.26-3.24) | <0.001 | ||
| 2009 | 84.1 (24.4) | 2.68 (2.09-3) | 2.5 (2.09-3) | <0.001 | ||
| 2010 | 69.7 (27.3) | 1.17 (0.89-1.24) | 1.05 (0.89-1.24) | 0.55 | ||
| 2011 | 66.2 (32.6) | 0.99 (0.78-1.06) | 0.91 (0.78-1.06) | 0.21 | ||
| 2012 | 76.9 (31.5) | 1.69 (1.4-1.95) | 1.65 (1.4-1.95) | <0.001 | ||
SD=Standard deviation, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confidence interval