| Literature DB >> 31527649 |
Xiaoqing Liu1, Na Li1, Cuixia Feng1, Chenghua Fu1, Quan Gong2, Jiansheng Lai3, Zhu Jiang1, Yao Yang1, Haoran Shi1.
Abstract
High total dissolved gas (TDG) levels and excessive suspended sediment (SS) concentrations pose serious threats to fish survival during flood season. However, little information is available on the effects of TDG supersaturation with varying SS concentrations on fish. In this study, laboratory experiments were performed to investigate the effects of TDG supersaturation with varying SS concentrations on five-month-old river sturgeons (Acipenser dabryanus). The test fish were exposed to combinations of SS concentrations (0, 200, 600 and 1,000 mg/L) and TDG levels (125, 130, 135 and 140%), and their mortality and median lethal time (LT50) were quantified. The fish showed abnormal behaviors (e.g., quick breathing, fast swimming and an agitated escape response) and symptoms of gas bubble disease (GBD). SS increased the mortality of river sturgeon exposed to TDG supersaturation. Furthermore, the LT50 values at 125% TDG were 4.47, 3.11, 3.07 and 2.68 h for the different SS concentrations (0, 200, 600 and 1,000 mg/L, respectively), representing a significant decrease in LT50 with increasing SS. However, at higher TDG levels (130-140%), there was no significant increase in LT50 with increasing SS. Therefore, river sturgeon showed weak tolerance of TDG-supersaturated water with SS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31527649 PMCID: PMC6746722 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49800-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1GBD symptoms of river sturgeon observed in the lethal experiment. (a) Bubbles on pectoral fins. (b) Bubbles on dorsal fins. (c) Bubbles and sediment in gills. (d) Sediment in gills. (e) Swollen abdomen and normal abdomen.
Figure 2Mortality of river sturgeon exposed to TDG levels of 125–140% at each sediment concentration: (a) 0 mg/L; (b) 200 mg/L; (c) 600 mg/L; (d) 1,000 mg/L.
The LT50 of river sturgeon at different SS concentrations and TDG levels, presented as the average (±SD, n = 2) of the two parallel experiments within each combination of TDG and SS. There were 60 fish in each treatment combination.
| SS (mg/L) | TDG levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 125% | 130% | 135% | 140% | |
| 0 | 4.47 ± 0.24 | 2.61 ± 0.18 | 2.42 ± 0.19 | 2.23 ± 0.22 |
| 200 | 3.65 ± 0.20 | 2.18 ± 0.11 | 1.87 ± 0.12 | 1.75 ± 0.18 |
| 600 | 3.07 ± 0.12 | 1.93 ± 0.08 | 1.76 ± 0.20 | 1.57 ± 0.10 |
| 1,000 | 2.68 ± 0.19 | 1.85 ± 0.26 | 1.59 ± 0.19 | 1.45 ± 0.16 |
The interaction between these two variables was not significant in LT50 based on two-way ANOVA.
Figure 3Linear correlation between the LT50 and SS concentrations at different TDG levels. Regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship. In these equations, y is the LT50 value, x is SS concentration, and R2 is the regression coefficient. P < 0.05 presents a significant negative linear correlation between the LT50 and SS concentrations at different TDG levels. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 2).