| Literature DB >> 31527144 |
Joke Muys1,2, Bettina Blaumeiser2,3, Katrien Janssens2, Patrick Loobuyck4, Yves Jacquemyn5,6.
Abstract
Detection of genetic aberrations in prenatal samples, obtained through amniocentesis or chorion villus biopsy, is increasingly performed using chromosomal microarray (CMA), a technique that can uncover both aneuploidies and copy number variants throughout the genome. Despite the obvious benefits of CMA, the decision on implementing the technology is complicated by ethical issues concerning variant interpretation and reporting. In Belgium, uniform guidelines were composed and a shared database for prenatal CMA findings was established. This Belgian approach sparks discussion: it is evidence-based, prevents inconsistencies and avoids parental anxiety, but can be considered paternalistic. Here, we reflect on the cultural and moral bases of the Belgian reporting system of prenatally detected variants. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: Ethics; Genethics; Genetic Counselling/Prenatal Diagnosis; Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31527144 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903