Literature DB >> 31526687

Potential Role of Convolutional Neural Network Based Algorithm in Patient Selection for DCIS Observation Trials Using a Mammogram Dataset.

Simukayi Mutasa1, Peter Chang2, Eduardo P Van Sant1, John Nemer1, Michael Liu1, Jenika Karcich1, Gita Patel1, Sachin Jambawalikar3, Richard Ha4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the feasibility of utilizing convolutional neural network (CNN) for predicting patients with pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) versus DCIS with invasion using mammographic images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective study was performed. 246 unique images from 123 patients were used for our CNN algorithm. In total, 164 images in 82 patients diagnosed with DCIS by stereotactic-guided biopsy of calcifications without any upgrade at the time of surgical excision (pure DCIS group). A total of 82 images in 41 patients with mammographic calcifications yielding occult invasive carcinoma as the final upgraded diagnosis on surgery (occult invasive group). Two standard mammographic magnification views (CC and ML/LM) of the calcifications were used for analysis. Calcifications were segmented using an open source software platform 3D Slicer and resized to fit a 128 × 128 pixel bounding box. A 15 hidden layer topology was used to implement the neural network. The network architecture contained five residual layers and dropout of 0.25 after each convolution. Five-fold cross validation was performed using training set (80%) and validation set (20%). Code was implemented in open source software Keras with TensorFlow on a Linux workstation with NVIDIA GTX 1070 Pascal GPU.
RESULTS: Our CNN algorithm for predicting patients with pure DCIS achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 74.6% (95% CI, ±5) with area under the ROC curve of 0.71 (95% CI, ±0.04), specificity of 91.6% (95% CI, ±5%) and sensitivity of 49.4% (95% CI, ±6%).
CONCLUSION: It's feasible to apply CNN to distinguish pure DCIS from DCIS with invasion with high specificity using mammographic images.
Copyright © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNN; Calcifications; DCIS

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31526687      PMCID: PMC8142283          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features?

Authors:  Bibo Shi; Lars J Grimm; Maciej A Mazurowski; Jay A Baker; Jeffrey R Marks; Lorraine M King; Carlo C Maley; E Shelley Hwang; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Women with Low-Risk DCIS Eligible for the LORIS Trial After Complete Surgical Excision: How Low Is Their Risk After Standard Therapy?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Cristina Olcese; Sujata Patil; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Prediction of Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Using Deep Learning Features.

Authors:  Bibo Shi; Lars J Grimm; Maciej A Mazurowski; Jay A Baker; Jeffrey R Marks; Lorraine M King; Carlo C Maley; E Shelley Hwang; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Patient Selection for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Observation Trials: Are the Lesions Truly Low Risk?

Authors:  Gitanjali V Patel; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Bret Taback; Richard Ha
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Progress in the clinical detection of heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Long Song; Chuang Chen; Jing-Ping Yuan; Sheng-Rong Sun
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: radiological diagnosis.

Authors:  Andy Evans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.466

  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in breast radiology: current progress and future directions.

Authors:  William C Ou; Dogan Polat; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Application of deep learning to predict underestimation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with ultrasound.

Authors:  Lang Qian; Zhikun Lv; Kai Zhang; Kun Wang; Qian Zhu; Shichong Zhou; Cai Chang; Jie Tian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

3.  Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasion of the breast using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Meng Zhu; Yong Pi; Zekun Jiang; Yanyan Wu; Hong Bu; Ji Bao; Yujuan Chen; Lijun Zhao; Yulan Peng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.