Literature DB >> 31526192

Erratum: "Low-Level Environmental Lead Exposure and Children's Intellectual Function: An International Pooled Analysis".

Bruce P Lanphear, Richard Hornung, Jane Khoury, Kimberly Yolton, Peter Baghurst, David C Bellinger, Richard L Canfield, Kim N Dietrich, Robert Bornschein, Tom Greene, Stephen J Rothenberg, Herbert L Needleman, Lourdes Schnaas, Gail Wasserman, Joseph Graziano, Russell Roberts.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31526192      PMCID: PMC6792371          DOI: 10.1289/EHP5685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


× No keyword cloud information.
The source of the errors in this article, which were limited to the Boston cohort, was twofold. Specifically, performance IQ data were used instead of full-scale IQ data for children in the Boston cohort. In addition, when converting log-transformed 6-, 18-, and 24-month blood lead measurements, a value of 1 was added instead of subtracted, making the blood lead values in the Boston cohort higher than they should have been. Consequently, there were small errors in the peak, early-childhood, and lifetime lead values in the Boston cohort. In turn, these errors resulted in small errors in the associations between blood lead levels and full-scale IQ for the Boston cohort and, thus, the pooled analysis as a whole. Accordingly, we reanalyzed the data using full scale IQ data and corrected blood lead levels for the Boston cohort and provide the corrected data and results in the revised text. There also were small changes in the model values used as the a priori criterion for identifying the blood lead metric that was the strongest predictor of IQ. We originally relied on the to select the blood lead metric for the primary analysis. However, the for concurrent () and early childhood () blood lead levels were very similar ( and 0.643, respectively) in the revised analysis. In both the original and revised analyses, the coefficient for concurrent blood lead levels had a smaller standard error and higher level of significance than early childhood blood lead levels. In the revised analysis, the standard error for concurrent blood lead and IQ was 0.530 and the level of significance was . In contrast, the standard error for early childhood blood lead and IQ was 0.597 and the level of significance was . We therefore retained concurrent blood lead level as the metric of choice and clarified this in the revised text. Importantly, the U.S. EPA and other investigators concluded that the data errors had only minor effects on the estimates and did not change the overall results or alter the scientific conclusions about the effects of low blood lead concentrations on cognitive function in young children (Crump et al. 2013; U.S. EPA 2013; Kirrane and Patel 2014). The authors regret the errors. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
Table 1

Characteristics of the children and of their mothers in the pooled analysis ().

CharacteristicValue
Child characteristics
 Femalea669 (50.2)
 Birth weightb (g)3,286±503
 Gestation at deliveryb (weeks)39.6±1.9
 Birth orderc2.0 (1–5)
Blood lead concentration (μg/dL)c
 Concurrent9.7 (2.5–33.2)
 Peak18.0 (6.0–47.0)
 Early childhood12.7 (3.5–34.5)
 Lifetime average11.9 (3.6–34.5)
 Peak blood lead concentration <10μg/dLa258 (19.4)
 Peak blood lead concentration <7.5μg/dLa118 (8.9)
 IQb93.4±19.6
 Age at IQ testingb (years)6.9±1.2
Maternal characteristics
 Age at deliveryb (years)25.4±5.4
 Maternal IQb88.2±18.5
 Education at deliveryb (grade)11.1±2.8
 HOME scoreb37.0±8.4
 Marrieda896 (67.3)
 Smoked during pregnancya453 (34.1)
 Alcohol use during pregnancya278 (21.2)

HOME Score was standardized to preschool test. Early childhood blood lead concentration was defined as the mean of 6- to 24-month blood lead tests. Lifetime average blood lead concentration was defined as the mean of blood lead tests taken from 6 months through the concurrent blood lead test.

No. (%).

.

Median (5th and 95th percentiles).

Table 2

Characteristics of 1,333 children and their mothers in seven cohort studies of environmental lead exposure and IQ.

CharacteristicBoston (n=116)Cincinnati (n=221)Cleveland (n=160)Mexico (n=99)Port Pirie (n=324)Rochester (n=182)Yugoslavia (n=231)
Percent femalea60 (51.7)108 (48.9)73 (45.6)50 (50.5)174 (53.7)89 (48.9)115 (49.8)
Birth weightb (g)3,412±5103,144±4573,199±4983,254±4323,393±5023,226±5063,328±526
Gestation at deliveryb (weeks)40.0±1.839.6±1.739.6±1.240.2±1.139.9±1.739.1±1.839.3±2.9
Birth orderb1.6±1.02.6±1.42.2±1.11.8±0.92.0±1.12.4±1.42.6±1.7
IQ testWISC-RWISC-RWPPSIWISC-SWISC-RWPPSIWISC-III
IQ scoreb119.3±14.987.0±11.486.7±16.2107.8±11.0106.0±13.784.9±14.474.2±13.3
Age at IQ testing (years)1074.87767
Blood lead concentrationsc
 Concurrent blood lead5.4 (0.8–12.7)7.5 (3.5–20.0)14.2 (7.0–28.5)7.0 (3.0–16.5)13.0 (6.0–24.0)4.0 (1.5–12.0)15.9 (4.7–47.8)
 Peak blood lead10.4 (4.1–25.0)17.9 (9.0–38.0)18.0 (9.0–34.0)15.0 (6.0–40.0)27.0 (15.0–46.0)9.0 (3.5–23.3)23.8 (7.6–61.5)
 Early childhood6.1 (1.3–16.0)12.0 (6.6–26.6)13.4 (7.9–24.8)11.4 (4.3–26.8)20.5 (11.0–33.3)5.8 (2.4–13.1)14.1 (4.3–44.0)
 Lifetime mean5.6 (2.2–13.0)11.7 (5.8–24.9)14.5 (8.1–25.3)10.6 (4.5–21.3)18.6 (10.8–30.2)5.5 (2.4–12.8)15.8 (5.6–49.3)
 Peak blood lead <10μg/dLa55 (47.4)23 (10.4)11 (6.9)20 (20.2)0 (0.0)103 (56.6)46 (19.9)
 Peak blood lead <7.5μg/dLa28 (24.1)1 (0.4)1 (0.6)8 (8.1)0 (0.0)69 (37.9)11 (4.8)
Maternal characteristics
 Age at delivery (years)b30.5±4.222.7±4.322.2±3.827.1±5.926.0±4.224.8±6.626.6±5.1
 Race (nonwhite)a5 (4.3)197 (89.1)69 (43.1)NANA130 (71.4)NA
 Maternal IQb124.2±16.275.2±9.473.4±13.293.4±11.994.4±11.081.1±12.687.3±14.8
 Education at delivery (grade)b15.2±2.011.2±1.410.6±1.611.4±3.510.6±1.012.2±2.08.8±3.9
 HOME scoreb50.5±3.532.7±6.238.1±6.736.8±6.742.3±4.631.9±6.330.4±6.8
 Marrieda107 (92.2)30 (13.6)82 (51.2)88 (88.9)298 (92.0)60 (33.2)231 (100)
 Tobacco use during pregnancya29 (25.0)111 (50.2)128 (80.0)6 (6.1)79 (24.6)41 (22.6)59 (25.5)
 Alcohol use during pregnancya61 (52.6)31 (14.0)75 (46.9)6 (6.1)82 (25.3)9 (5.5)14 (6.1)

NA, Not applicable. HOME score was standardized to preschool scale. Concurrent blood lead tests taken at 5 years of age were used as the concurrent blood lead test for the Boston cohort and the IQ test was done at 10 years. Test scores of children in the Yugoslavia cohort are low because of adjustments in adapting tests where no standardization existed; rather than deriving appropriate analogues, some culturally driven items were removed, resulting in lower scores.

No. (%).

.

Median (5th and 95th percentiles).

Table 3

Concurrent blood lead concentration and mean IQ scores by characteristics of children and their mothers ().

CovariateNo.Median concurrent blood lead (μg/dL) (5th–95th percentiles)IQ±SD
Child
 Female6699.0 (2.4–31.4)94.2±18.6
 Male6649.9 (2.6–35.7)92.7±20.4
 Birth weight (g)
  <3,00035910.0 (2.2–28.7)88.8±18.3
  3,000 to <3,5005199.9 (2.4–34.2)93.9±19.8
  3,5004559.1 (2.8–34.7)96.6±19.7
 Gestation at delivery (weeks)
  <381448.9 (3.1–37.9)84.0±19.4
  38 to <421,0719.8 (2.5–33.2)94.3±18.9
  4211510.0 (3.2–24.8)97.1±22.9
 Birth order
  14799.0 (2.1–32.6)97.2±19.6
  240710.0 (2.6–31.4)93.9±19.7
  344610.0 (3.0–36.9)89.0±18.7
Maternal
 Race (only U.S. cohorts)
  White2787.9 (1.3–22.0)101.9±21.3
  Nonwhite4017.1 (2.8–21.5)84.9±12.8
 Age at delivery (years)
  <2565010.5 (3.0–32.0)89.6±17.3
  256839.0 (2.1–34.7)97.1±20.9
 Maternal IQ
  <8561810.0 (2.9–32.0)83.3±15.0
  857159.0 (2.1–34.3)102.2±18.9
 Education at delivery (grade)
  <1271012.0 (4.1–35.5)90.4±18.8
  123978.7 (2.4–34.3)91.1±17.8
  122265.5 (1.1–15.2)107.1±19.4
 HOME score
  <302769.4 (3.0–43.0)77.9±14.9
  30 to <4056110.0 (2.8–32.2)88.4±15.4
  404969.5 (2.0–22.0)107.8±16.5
 Married
  Yes89610.0 (2.7–37.5)96.6±21.0
  No4368.1 (2.4–22.0)87.0±14.4
 Prenatal smoking
  Yes45311.5 (3.2–33.2)89.7±17.3
  No8768.7 (2.2–33.6)95.3±20.4
 Prenatal alcohol ingestion
  Yes27810.1 (2.2–25.0)100.1±20.2
  No1,0359.5 (2.7–34.3)91.8±19.1
Table 4

Mean unadjusted and adjusted changes in full-scale IQ score associated with an increase in blood lead concentration (log scale), from the 5th to 95th percentile of the concurrent blood lead level at the time of IQ testing.

Blood lead variableUnadjusted estimates [β (95% CI)]Adjusted estimates [β (95% CI)]Blood lead concentration (5th to 95th percentile, μg/dL)IQ deficits [5th to 95th percentile (95% CI)]
Early childhood3.51 (4.83 to 2.19)2.21 (3.38 to 1.04)3.5–34.55.0 (2.4–7.7)
Peak5.04 (6.44 to 3.65)2.86 (4.10 to 1.61)6.0–47.05.9 (3.3–8.4)
Lifetime average5.58 (6.98 to 4.18)3.25 (4.51 to 1.99)3.6–34.57.4 (4.5–10.2)
Concurrent4.84 (5.98 to 3.69)2.65 (3.69 to 1.61)2.4–33.17.0 (4.2–9.7)

Adjusted for site, HOME score, birth weight, maternal IQ, and maternal education. The addition of child’s sex, tobacco exposure during pregnancy, alcohol use during pregnancy, maternal age at delivery, marital status, and birth order did not alter the estimate, and these were not included in the model. The estimates for the covariates in the concurrent blood lead model were HOME score (, ), birth (, ), maternal IQ (, ) and maternal education (, ).

  42 in total

1.  Exposure to lead in children--how low is low enough?

Authors:  Walter J Rogan; James H Ware
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Intellectual impairment and blood lead levels.

Authors:  David C Bellinger; Herbert L Needleman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Relationships between Pb-induced changes in neurotransmitter system function and behavioral toxicity.

Authors:  D A Cory-Slechta
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 4.  Lead neurotoxicity in children: basic mechanisms and clinical correlates.

Authors:  Theodore I Lidsky; Jay S Schneider
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  The relationship between blood lead concentrations, intelligence and attainment in a school population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Q Yule; R Lansdown; I B Millar; M A Urbanowicz
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.449

6.  Early exposure to lead and juvenile delinquency.

Authors:  K N Dietrich; M D Ris; P A Succop; O G Berger; R L Bornschein
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.763

7.  The developmental consequences of low to moderate prenatal and postnatal lead exposure: intellectual attainment in the Cincinnati Lead Study Cohort following school entry.

Authors:  K N Dietrich; O G Berger; P A Succop; P B Hammond; R L Bornschein
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.763

8.  Low-level lead exposure, intelligence and academic achievement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  D C Bellinger; K M Stiles; H L Needleman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Cognitive and sensorimotor functions in 6-year-old children in relation to lead and mercury levels: adjustment for intelligence and contrast sensitivity in computerized testing.

Authors:  J Walkowiak; L Altmann; U Krämer; K Sveinsson; M Turfeld; M Weishoff-Houben; G Winneke
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.763

10.  Condition and type of housing as an indicator of potential environmental lead exposure and pediatric blood lead levels.

Authors:  C S Clark; R L Bornschein; P Succop; S S Que Hee; P B Hammond; B Peace
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.498

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preparation of RGO and Anionic Polyacrylamide Composites for Removal of Pb(II) in Aqueous Solution.

Authors:  Lili Wu; Mengke Li; Mu Li; Qiyue Sun; Chaocan Zhang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.329

2.  Neurotoxicants, the Developing Brain, and Mental Health.

Authors:  Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Elisabeth Burnor; Megan M Herting
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Sex-Dependent Effects of Developmental Lead Exposure in Wistar Rats: Evidence from Behavioral and Molecular Correlates.

Authors:  Anna Maria Tartaglione; Melania Maria Serafini; Andrea Raggi; Francesca Iacoponi; Elisa Zianni; Alessandro Scalfari; Luisa Minghetti; Laura Ricceri; Francesco Cubadda; Gemma Calamandrei; Barbara Viviani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Tissue- and Sex-Specific DNA Methylation Changes in Mice Perinatally Exposed to Lead (Pb).

Authors:  Kai Wang; Siyu Liu; Laurie K Svoboda; Christine A Rygiel; Kari Neier; Tamara R Jones; Justin A Colacino; Dana C Dolinoy; Maureen A Sartor
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.599

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.